please_let_me_win wrote:
They say it's boring because they can't understand it.
probably this?
why do people say magnus style is boring
Sort:
Let's imagine there are two 3500 rated plyers. Neither misses any tactics ever. Therefore, neither player can use any tactics.
It's just a battle to squeek the most centipawn advantage into your position.
Is that boring?
DrCheckevertim wrote:
Let's imagine there are two 3500 rated plyers. Neither misses any tactics ever. Therefore, neither player can use any tactics.
It's just a battle to squeek the most centipawn advantage into your position.
Is that boring?
are you saying carlsen is so good that his games are percieved to be boring
superking500 wrote:
DrCheckevertim wrote:
Let's imagine there are two 3500 rated plyers. Neither misses any tactics ever. Therefore, neither player can use any tactics.
It's just a battle to squeek the most centipawn advantage into your position.
Is that boring?
are you saying carlsen is so good that his games are percieved to be boring
Yes, and he's not the first person who's said that on one of your threads.
i hear that criticism alot, is it because he prefers to play simple posistions which he is much superior then his opponet...why complicate when he doesnt need to