Why i never sacrifice queens

Okay, this one is easy because its too obvious and capturing the queen is forced so I can see the result, but it also depends of the turn of the player, if its black to play then its not checkmate because black can do something about it

I wouldn't call that a sacrifice. It's a mating tactic. A real sacrifice is to play a tactic which leaves you down on material but with a positional advantage.
I'd agree with the OP. It's difficult in Speed Chess to sacrifice a Queen then work a win with minor pieces while the opponent's Queen can continuously, safely, probe for inaccuracies with little thought.

1: i cant even see 2 moves in the future
2: The queen is the strongest piece
3: if anything goes wrong i lose the game (and theres 100% chance i will lose the game if i dont have a queen but my oponent have one
4: I am mentally too sane
Not 100%

1: i cant even see 2 moves in the future
2: The queen is the strongest piece
3: if anything goes wrong i lose the game (and theres 100% chance i will lose the game if i dont have a queen but my oponent have one
4: I am mentally too sane
Not 100%
Why? i only can see moves in the future when its too obvious

I hate bringing my queen out early, even when theory tells me I must as in this line:

I hate bringing my queen out early, even when theory tells me I must as in this line:
Okay, but i also rely on my other pieces
1: i cant even see 2 moves in the future
2: The queen is the strongest piece
3: if anything goes wrong i lose the game (and theres 100% chance i will lose the game if i dont have a queen but my oponent have one
4: I am mentally too sane