Why Is the Rook so Short?

Sort:
Buford-TJustise
the rook is so short because a big sumbitch fatass sat on it.
chessspy1

Here is an interesting rook which, whilst short, can benull higher than any other pieces.

 

chessspy1

Another tall rook

null

chessspy1

Anyway, Who's looking at the pieces? This is 'art'

null

Buford-TJustise

first time i saw a naked woman with a bunch of horses on her, lady godiva would make quite a good knight, time to design a new chess set.

chessspy1

Shouldn't that be 'goldurned nekked' and hosses? And, 'that ther lady Godiva AND, 'Time ter dersine' etc.

I think you are an imposter.

chessspy1

Decisions, decisions... 

null

Buford-TJustise

OK, chess spy, thanks for correcting my normally rednecked grammar! sorry i must be hanging out too much with upper class bichiz down at the local these days.

Buford-TJustise

may as well show you how irresistible i have always been to the ladies since i was a rugrat.

null

chessspy1

happy.png Buford. Y'all still got it mate...

However to bring things back to more intelligent posting. (some might say).

this excerpt from Prof. Sir Alan Fersht's book.

Larger rooks: Staunton and Imperial Mark 2

Around the turn of the century, the ever-active Moffatt introduced sets in which the height of 
the pieces more closely reflected their value on the chessboard. The traditional Staunton rook 
is shorter than the bishop. The new rook is slightly taller than the bishop, which is marginally 
taller than the knight and. (Figure 86). The knight is carved and not Xylonite.

null

 

chessspy1

 Another example from BCC

null

chessspy1

So we see that although Jaques followed the traditional sizing of sets with heights ranging from the middle down, the other reasonable alternative with BCCs idea of making the pieces more closely reflect their ( later to be called Shannon) value, was explored to some success (If only for 15 years)  by BCC who's sets are very prized by those lucky few who can afford them.,

FBloggs
chessspy1 wrote:

Here is an interesting rook which, whilst short, can be higher than any other pieces.

 

You mistakenly posted a picture of an airplane instead of a rook.

FBloggs
chessspy1 wrote:

Another tall rook

 

Cool looking rook. But what if I need a second queen? I don't think turning that thing upside down would work.

FBloggs
chessspy1 wrote:

Anyway, Who's looking at the pieces? This is 'art'

 

Took me a few minutes before I noticed the knights.

FBloggs
Buford-TJustice wrote:

first time i saw a naked woman with a bunch of horses on her, lady godiva would make quite a good knight, time to design a new chess set.

As Lloyd Bentsen would say, "You're no Jackie Gleason."

FBloggs
chessspy1 wrote:

Shouldn't that be 'goldurned nekked' and hosses? And, 'that ther lady Godiva AND, 'Time ter dersine' etc.

I think you are an imposter.

That was not the first time Buford slipped. Yesterday he said "would've."

FBloggs
chessspy1 wrote:

Decisions, decisions... 

 

Which ones are the rooks?

FBloggs
chessspy1 wrote:

 Another example from BCC

 

I don't like the tall rook. Guess it's 'cause I've become accustomed to the short one.

Pulpofeira

Possibly of interest: http://deludoscachorum.blogspot.com.es/2016/07/la-escala-real-de-las-torres-de.html