Why is this game so male-dominated?

Sort:
learningthemoves

Not to split hairs here, but since one of the first signs of ovulation may be bloating, if one talks at length about it in an inflated way, one would be bloviating.

netzach
mendez1996 wrote:
netzach wrote:
mendez1996 wrote:

Conflagration_Planet, speaking of fools, when you actually reach 900 Blitz & 1000 Standard rating come talk to me. Say whatever you want, I'm ranked 27th in my highschool class out of 800~ students, so 

 

 

27th in nerd-table?

27th best gpa in my class, but this will take some time explaining to a Scot

Being mocking/arrogant relegates you right to rock-bottom of the class in this Scot's opinion.

nameno1had

That is why I'll never vote for Kasparov...oh and I can get a date...lol

goldendog
mendez1996 wrote:

27th best gpa in my class, but this will take some time explaining to a Scot

You don't distinguish yourself in a positive way by such foolish remarks.

Elubas

So does the theory temporarily refute itself when a girl has the top GPA, at least until a male gets it again?

netzach
mendez1996 wrote:
 

> implying I care about a random guy's opinion of me on the internet. 

Apparently all you care about is blowing-your-own-trumpet which is impressing nobody. 

The sun doesn't shine from that place.

Elubas

He is hoping the Asian's wit will telepathically sink into all males' brains, even the unintelligent ones Surprised

kco

Knew there was a kid here with a potty mouth.

batgirl
mendez1996 wrote:

I dont know the ratio, but my friend who just happens to be male ( and asian) finished 1st. Only further proving why Males are intellectually superior...

 

Actually, promoting that conclusion proves precisely the opposite.

Elubas

And the whole male achievements are not representing you as an individual.

batgirl

"As far as I can see you didn't say anything that was accurate."

So, you're say-so it the refutation?  Thanks for the debate.

Elubas

I do think people often use the same "men are better at chess" to mean different things. Some might use it to say if there is a man and a woman the man is more likely to be the better player. Other people simply mean there are more men at the top or are capable of being at the top (in other words they are referring to a small sample of men rather than men in general, contrary to the sentence).

I am smart enough to know people don't always mean what they say, but not smart enough to mind read. I think there are a lot of people that say that sentence and don't realize what they are actually saying.

batgirl
mendez1996 wrote:

What I'm saying is you cant use the argument that becuase some girls had higher GPA than me means they are the same level as men as a whole. 

So isn't the inverse also true?

Stevie65
mendez1996 wrote:
Pelikan_Player wrote:

Thousands? Try billions. But hey, let's admire Madoff's smarts and intellect. Just cause he destroyed people's lives is no reason not to admire him, right? And Hitler? Yeah, he led a movement that killed around 6 million people. But look how smart and wise he was! You can separate the intellect behind the act from the act itself? Let me guess...None of your relatives lost money in the Madoff scam or were the victim of a serial killer

well Adolf Hitler literally turned a poverty country in ruins after WW1 to almost dominating the whole world if it wasnt for the United States help. Of course his motives were not great, but that is very admirable in a military standpoint. 

 

and lol @ anyone falling for scams, you wanna know why none of my relatives lost money becuase of it? becuase none of them are dumb*******

Adolf Hitler was very unremarkable as any one intelligent,He was an under achiever at art school..Then only attained corpral during the first world war...He got no where near world domination,only Europe...The british government of the time either delayed or cancelled assaination attempts because he blundered regular battle tactics..He didnt recover Germanies economy,his ministers did.  All he was good at was talking a good talk.

nameno1had

I didn't even think Hitler was good at that...that is what they actually have in common...

netzach

What does an orange-fish know about Hitler?

jambyvedar

The answer to the question is simple, it's scientificaly proven that males are better at things that requries logical thinking, while girls are better at communication skills. Since chess requires logical thinking, it's not surprising that there are more males players than female players.

Stevie65

He was also asexual..He had trouble getting it up.

Stevie65
jambyvedar wrote:

The answer to the question is simple, it's scientificaly proven that males are better at things that requries logical thinking, while girls are better at communication skills. Since chess requires logical thinking, it's not surprising that there are more males players than female players.

How would you account for all the women players that could beat you at chess?

nameno1had
netzach wrote:

What does an orange-fish know about Hitler?

IDK...I never met an orange fish before...

This forum topic has been locked