why isn't botvinnik talked about as much

Sort:
Avatar of I_Am_Second
chessmaster54458 wrote:

as the other champions...

 

he pretty much led the way to soviet school chess domination

Just my opinion...

i thinks its because many players view him as "boring".  He isnt exciting like Tal, Kasparov, or Karpov.  Krammnik is more modern.  Alekhine is considered "exciting" because of his tactics.  The modern average player views themselves as a tactical player because its exciting, whereas, Botvinniks universal style isnt as exciting.

Avatar of Crazychessplaya

... and Botvinnik played the French Defence, for goodness sake. Need I say more!?

Avatar of ghostofmaroczy
Crazychessplaya wondered:

Need I say more!?

Yes