I enjoy long walks, eating out and movies.
"eating out"
Click on Edit, change what you want, take a print screen, and post it on chess.com. Not difficult to do.
This trainwreck ranks right up there with people feebly using photoshop and thinking they have mastered something special.
Remember, this is wikipedia and people can alter unlocked pages.
The grammar in the second example is incorrect. I'm guessing someone is having a bit of fun with wikipedia... perhaps even... the author of this thread?!
I have a nephew who once edited a page about guns. He replaced every occurrence of the word "gun" with the word "penis".
Remember, this is wikipedia and people can alter unlocked pages.
I have a nephew who once edited a page about guns. He replaced every occurrence of the word "gun" with the word "penis".
Exactly! Wikipedia ranks up there with Snopes. if that is your source of "facts" and you refuse to do any critical thinking, then you get what you deserve.
It was not me but I might know who would've done this lol.
Why did you even go to the Wikipedia chess.com page... Hmmm?... Hmmm??!
I'm just kidding.
It seems like a good gag to me. Good, clean, wholesome fun.
Can you tell the whole story?... Without incriminating anybody?
Remember, this is wikipedia and people can alter unlocked pages.
I have a nephew who once edited a page about guns. He replaced every occurrence of the word "gun" with the word "penis".
Exactly! Wikipedia ranks up there with Snopes. if that is your source of "facts" and you refuse to do any critical thinking, then you get what you deserve.
"Critical thinking"?
I find that religious nuts have a scant idea what that term entails.
Remember, this is wikipedia and people can alter unlocked pages.
I have a nephew who once edited a page about guns. He replaced every occurrence of the word "gun" with the word "penis".
Exactly! Wikipedia ranks up there with Snopes. if that is your source of "facts" and you refuse to do any critical thinking, then you get what you deserve.
"Critical thinking"?
I find that religious nuts have a scant idea what that term entails.
When in doubt...generalize.
If it can be obtained without proof, it can be dismissed without proof. So maybe we're dating and maybe we're not. These are the last 2 women I dated from Chess.com. It was ABsolutely FABulous sweetie daling.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chess.com