[CHILD SAFETY]: Disallow graphic/suggestive avatars!

Sort:
wanmokewan

VyboR wrote:

So let your child play on chesskid.com instead of here.

That's not a solution. I don't want to see porn on here; it's easy enough to find already on the Internet.

adamplenty
Xilmi wrote:
adamplenty wrote:
Xilmi wrote:
charington67 wrote:

What I find funny is that the OP himself commented on "her" page...

Hilarious! :D

However, I don't understand what kind of danger something like that would cause for children.

Can someone please elaborate?

(S)he posted a pornography blog. Totally unsuitable for children. That's what got the account banned.

I was asking about dangers not about suitability.

And who determines that anyways?

I once was a child too. And I remember what happened when I saw something like that. If someone else would have noticed, it could probably have been a little embarassing. But that's about the greatest "danger" we got there. And do you know why it was embarassing? Because I didn't know why it happened cause noone had told me by then.

Do you realize that at one point in history of our species children were seing clothless individuals of all ages all day long?

I consider "danger" as a high likelyhood of physical harm. And as long as their pants are not too tight to allow some unfolding to happen, I still fail to see the dangers here.

Yes, what was posted is a danger. Being exposed to adult material can mentally and maybe emotionally harm children.

TheElementalMaster

Of course every kid has seen some kind of clothless person. As if the internet isn't safe and sound already.

Benzodiazepine

Yes, that's true.

I had been exposed to "adult" content from when I was a tender 12 years old.

To this day, I have not recovered. I'm mentally ill (as you might have noticed).

TheElementalMaster

And plus when you go into the changing room for a swim team its not like no one would start a huge towel war and... nvm.

auvo

TheElementalMaster

LOL

kleelof

I think if there is one part of the human body that would not be offensive to children, it would be breasts. After spending a number of months of their lives with their face attached to one, I don't think the sight of one is going to bother them.

Might make them hungry though.Laughing

camberfoil

Maybe not to adults, but to children?

Benzodiazepine

I don't remember having fed on breasts. I consider them highly inappropriate.

When I was 4 (almost 5) years old, I ran over the road and got hit by a van. It briefly hit me and made me hit the ground with my head hard. I remember seeing the person run out with his hands on his head. The next thing I remember is waking up with a bandaged head and being told that I suffered a brain concussion.

I don't remember much of what happened before my 5th year of age. I don't know whether that's normal or due to my brain injury.

kleelof
Benzodiazepine wrote:

I don't remember having fed on breasts. I consider them highly inappropriate.

 I don't know whether that's normal or due to my brain injury.

Brain injury.Laughing

TheElementalMaster

lol

camberfoil

How is it funny that he experienced brain trauma?

Praxis_Streams

I'm dying of laughter...

Mauve26
adamplenty wrote:
Benzodiazepine wrote:
Brazil_World wrote:

Please search that username at your own risk.

I did, and now I wish I had not.

As do I.

I will not

kleelof

Maybe it was the brain damage talking.Laughing

TheElementalMaster

Maybe he's getting more fed up?

TheElementalMaster

Wait, did someone delete posts on this or is my comp glitching out?

ghostofmaroczy
Benzodiazepine might have made the stupidest post in history:

I don't remember having fed on breasts. I consider them highly inappropriate.

kleelof
ghostofmaroczy wrote:
Benzodiazepine might have made the stupidest post in history:

I don't remember having fed on breasts. I consider them highly inappropriate.

Once again, brain damage.