Demotivating.

Thats everyy game too not just chess. It's just the sad point the world has come to.

Perhaps there's some context I'm missing, but I don't see anything of particular note there. If anything, he wasted a pawn to just go back and let you develop for free. It's just that, well, you happened to move the pawn that was blocking their bishop from taking your rook. It's something that's happened to everyone before.

Though I completely understand the frustration, it seems to me that you're attributing a lot of motivations and traits to a random stranger you don't know, simply because they played a gambit and didn't follow it up how you expected them (or yourself in their situation) to.

Lilyana, it is just a defensive player. That’s it. 
“I hop onto unrated to have a nice fun game”

Have you considered that those players might be ‘freeing themselves from theory’ and just playing how they want to?

”because the game got unplayable”

I think the game isn’t all that unplayable. Like I said, it’s a valid strategy. Unless you deal with the annoying player that copies your moves, the opening theory you learnt isn’t very useful. People see the game in different ways and from different perspectives. While you may not enjoy playing people like this, I dislike pawn endgames and love queen endgames. I still play them regardless. If you really find yourself having difficulties dealing with this, I recommend you find a group of like-minded players that play with rules that suit you.

1.d4 c5 is not a gambit as Black is obviously going to win the pawn back. After that he made very reasonable moves to win your pawn back, and when he did you just blundered your rook. What is annoying in this other than your own mistakes?

How they just played passive. I dont like that. It feels illegal

Even when they were now winning they were still being so passive.

It's just another reasonable playing style. If they have a good success rate with that style then they should play it.

But like its unrated :-: if u wanna play like that do it in rated

Honestly, this is the most helpful post on this thread, whether anyone accepts it or not.

Why shouldn't you play according to your style just because it is unrated?

people are mad cuz this play style is deviating from the play style that chess was created for. people are mad because the new era of chess is people playing like this. i'm not taking sides btw but I agree that this play style is annoying

That's a good point, but people are free to play whatever style they like. If you find it annoying you can prepare against it. It's like making a forum called "I find it annoying when people beat me" rather than actually trying to get better at chess.

People can play how they want. Also gambits aren't always for attacking, sometimes they are just to get some quicker developement

Gambit does not always necessarily means it has to be aggressive almost immediately chess is a harsh game but your point here is dubious if you hate gambit and opening traps that much then stick to 960/fischer random, you cant just blame your opponent for developing their pieces

There is nothing wrong with that

I rage in chess but for a different reason. Lag is my absolute #1 worst enemy by far! It's unbelievably frustrating!!!

There is a lot... a thing about games people look for cheap ways to win and that is this exact concept.

But if they have the best success rate with cheap ways, then they should play them.

Why should your opponent care about what is annoying for you, unrated or not?

No one ma,ipulated you into playing 10.b4 which loses the game on the spot.

You're being whinny.

And mental issues or not, no one forces you to bow to any emotion.

Would you live in a country or a time where being stupid kills you, you'd overcome your emotions as it go.