A hypothetical rating comparison thread; how exciting.
'
Sort:
Feb 19, 2012
0
#3
Ratings are only useful in the system in which they operate. Comparisons across systems are not particularly helpful. Another thread on this topic really isn't either.
The real question is...would Fischer's Chess.com rating have been lower than Kasparov's?
Live or Turnbased?
Feb 19, 2012
0
#6
Actually, I also have wondered why some of the masters have quite low ratings here on chess.com. I figured that they either don't take the games here very seriously or constantly get challenged by idiots with engines.
[COMMENT DELETED]