advantage of moving first - mate in 4 in symmetrical position



Loomis, 1...Qgxf7! 2.Qh8+! Qxh8 3.Qxh8+! 4.Qff8 Qhxf8#. Just looking at that position gives me headaches, but Rybka confirms it's a mate-in-four no matter what Black does.
Unless a unicorn materializes on f8 or g8.

1. benws, I "said" only the *first* move was unique.
2. Loomis, I stand corrected - Black's moves are *not* forced, of course. I've shown only one variation. [orejano showed another above].

P.S. Also I *haven't* run retroanalysis to come up with a proof game to show that this position is legally reachable from the starting position of chess [I have a feeling it is *not* :( ] - nor have i tried to prove [with or without Retractor's help] that this position is *unreachable* from the starting position.
Actually I just thought this up a few years back - inspired by some similarly crazy stuff on Albillo's site I think it was [not updated for years] - then forgot about it - i wanted to see how to make diagrams here - in doing so I found to my horror that I had happened to finally perpetrate this on the world.
So, gentle reader, exercise if you are interested: prove that this position is not reachable from the standard starting position of chess; or else give a "proof game" - i.e. move-list of a game of chess where this position *is* reached [presumably the game ends 4 moves later with checkmate ;/ ]


It should be trivial to do, but it would take a long time to line up the pieces to be captured and avoid checks once there are that many queens on board. There are 14 capturable pieces, and you only need 7 captures to clear lines for 7 pawns from each side to promote so you would even have to spend some tempi 'cleaning up' the extra pieces.


[addressed to all, but 1st paragraph specially to RudyVolmar in particular:]
Hey, the *caption* is not serious! I wouldn't have put this in the "other puzzles" category if there was some deep point to this puzzle. The puzzle's only point is itself ; /
As for whether the pos. is reachable-or-not - I think some serious retro-thinking is needed --- well Ive tried all the retro-problems in the two Raymond Smullyan retrochess books - the sherlock holmes one and "arabian knights" - [that was before 2000] - solved most of them too - and also a few not-easy ones from the "retroanalysis corner" - [can't give the url offhand - i am on a backup hard disk - my hard disk crashed with all the bookmarks - though i have backed them up somewhere]. And my experience says - *if* this is unreachable-from-beginning then that fact *might* be provable in an hour's-or-less with some serious retroanalysis. [i haven't done retro-probs since 2003] But *if* the position is reachable, then getting a proof-game will require or at least be greatly aided by retrochess software like retractor [ i had it on my crashed HD - again it is backed-up *somewhere* im sure ] or something better.

normajeanyates> But *if* the position is reachable, then getting a proof-game will require or at least be greatly aided by retrochess software
No serious "retro-thinking" is required. I already explained how to setup this position above, "It should be trivial to do, but it would take a long time to line up the pieces to be captured and avoid checks once there are that many queens on board. There are 14 capturable pieces, and you only need 7 captures to clear lines for 7 pawns from each side to promote so you would even have to spend some tempi 'cleaning up' the extra pieces."
I sacrificed 14 minutes of my life to demonstrate (I would probably have otherwise wasted it watching the news anyway!) It could be done in many fewer moves:
Okay I thought this up 3-4 years ago - it is kind of silly, but here goes.
(for a more serious puzzle on the symmetry idea, see:
http://www.chess.com/forum/view/more-puzzles/mate-in-4-from-the-starting-position-if-black-play-strictly-simetrically)