24031 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Backgammon, Yatzy, and more!
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
This problem comes from an ancient Persian text Kitab ash-sharanj (the book of chess) and the author ad-Adli was known at his time (around 836 AC) as one of the best player of the Persian/Turkish area. His book was known as one of the first attempt of chess deep analysis and consisted of 5 levels.
White to move and checkmate in 3 moves.
Great puzzle, thanks
I didn't even know modern chess had been developed at that point in history! Great puzzle!
Those dates can't be correct, unless he meant AD maybe, but even then I don't think chess was around.
The Earliest evidence of a recognisable form of chess, CHATURANGA, is around AD 600. Before that, all is speculation.
Sorry I made a writing error the date was intended around 840 AC not BC.
But even this way believe me it's a huge amount of time (1169 years from now).
Think about this for a moment
gameboy has more or less 15 years
monopoli around 75
soccer and baseball about 150
chess (not chaturanga wich is much much earlier) 1400 years.
Pretty good isn't it? Chess.... the "immortal game"
It is realy great
So it seems I was wrong in my original comment, but you would think chess was a real work in progress back then. Was it really so similar to chess as it is played now? Usually someone from the 1700s or something is credited with the first recorded chess ideas (perhaps a book or problem), so this still seems fishy.
The puzzle is elegant though.
Back then castling didn't exist, the Queen and Bishops had different moves, and Pawns had no two-step (or en-passent). But this puzzle doesn't involve any of those factors.
I feel like punching my opponent in the face after losing
by ANOK1 7 minutes ago
Sicilian Defense F4 line?
by CNoahSay 11 minutes ago
The SER board explained
by JamesAgadir 13 minutes ago
10/26/2016 - What's Better Than Winning A Queen?
by vanhafford 14 minutes ago
How many forum topics?
by RonaldJosephCote 14 minutes ago
R. RETI, un Genio Olvidado-Cap. V-Lucha entre 2 piezas Heterogenes-Est. 31
by luis_albert 15 minutes ago
Does Karjakin even have a "puncher's chance"?
by LauriAikio 16 minutes ago
Typical Draw (Sorry)
by chessperson2222222 17 minutes ago
Who is your favorite chess.com player other than yourself
by Dark_Army 27 minutes ago
The notion that <1000 is awful?
by alexm2310 35 minutes ago
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2016 Chess.com
• Chess - English
Try the new Chess.com!
We are working hard to make Chess.com available in over 70 languages. Check back over the year as we develop the technology to add more, and we will try our best to notify you when your language is ready for translating!