azbfiya wrote:
mate in 4
Black made some bad moves.
Daily Puzzle Submissions! *Be Involved*
Sort:
Mate in four moves. Difficulty: Easy
Sep 7, 2011
0
#1045
DavidRay1028 wrote:
Black made some bad moves.
Black made A bad move, the knight should not have moved to fork but after that everything is forced
i made a note of that in the step-by-step but its hard to see...
anyways heres another sequence...again my opponent could have taken a better route but nonetheless this is how it played out
Sep 7, 2011
0
#1046
Alrom wrote:
Mate in four moves. Difficulty: Easy
the knight can also move to d8 instead of h6 for a possible mate in 3
White achieves a winning position in 3 moves
Sep 8, 2011
0
#1049
Sprite wrote:
Chesscrazy127, that's a good example of a smothered mate, but isn't checkmate as white can play 2.Kxa2 and avoid the mate.
Then Black plays Ra2#
Sep 8, 2011
0
#1050
Sprite wrote:
Chesscrazy127, that's a good example of a smothered mate, but isn't checkmate as white can play 2.Kxa2 and avoid the mate.
Then Black plays Ra7#
Sep 8, 2011
0
#1051
derrived from something i just played, i am really quite impressed with this one
black to move, win a knight....difficulty: the harder side of medium
note: the first move is meant to lure white into your trap it is not forced and i'll give you a hint, its a king move....
It was an odd opening I haven't seen. A very nice trap,though not often likely.
I'm learning paths of thought from many players. I thank you all kindly.
This one was special
Sep 10, 2011
0
#1053
from a game i just played: black to move, look for mate in the immediate future
xalwayts wrote:
Not my originality but i would like to share it with you all. An easy puzzle mate in 3. there is another solution to this puzzle rook slides over one square..pawn is forced to take...queen slides next to bishop...and mates next move....
Mate in 6
Difficulty: Medium Hard
Caello nice puzzle on pg 57, the mate in 6 after whites first move :P
xalways wrote:
Not my originality but i would like to share it with you all. An easy puzzle mate in 3.
that's not the only mate
forkman wrote:
Here's a puzzle I made up.
it looks like there's a mate in 1
mate in 4