P.S. those long posts are obviously compensating for something.
You are correct. Four decades as a TD/arbiter have shown me that when people do not understand something and have continued to not understand after an explanation then they need a full and complete explanation to compensate for the lack of understanding shorter explanations. I have had to explain tournament rules to IMs and GMs. Many other TDs/arbiters have had to do the same thing. A high rating does not guarantee an understanding of tournament rules (a fantastic understanding of the rules of play, but not necessarily an understanding of the rules for running tournaments).
This is laughable. In what way was d7 to d5 a blunder? You literally ranted in support of critical thinking while criticising me for talking about critical thinking. Now you're attempting to make me look dumb to make yourself feel superior instead of owning up to the fact you didn't understand a basic term. But if you really want to prove you're superior, why not put your money where your mouth is? 12 games, $50 a game. Draws push the money to the next round. 15|0.
But maybe chess isn't really as much your thing as you claim.
d7 to d5 is an absolute blunder because it allowed mate in one instead of escaping with Kc6-c7 with Black still being down material but still playing.