nothing to see here

thanks. 

The OP's 'alien intervention theory', is pretty bad, to say the least. Just substitute "aliens" for any idiotic thing in religious texts. And like religious texts, have people be so dumb that they need help from "aliens" to do anything.

i am not sure the parallel between the aliens helping build....insert amazing thing here... and religion is accurate.  granted, the tone of the OP's aliens being the creator of man do seem a bit more goddish than other ancient alien theories i am aware of. 

but with the aliens you have the idea that the people could not have done what they did without help.  whereas, in religions you have people doing things themselves to please their god.  perhaps i am not thinking of the same religious stories, though.

Any silly nonsense in the bible, for instance, such as angels, anything that flies, etc., the OP says actually denotes aliens. This would be just another fairy-tale that "modern man" unreasonably believes to be true, if it weren't for the fact that recent history actually shows that there are vehicals(?) being reported all over the world which makes the subject of alien visitation a matter of serious debate.

What the OP is doing, is sending us backwards to a "new" religion. No first hand accounts of eye-witnesses, no physical evidence, just "faith". Egyptian scholars have translated some of the language of the times of the pyramid's construction, to show that people built those structures, even though details of how they were built exactly, remains vague. To answer, why would they build such massive structures as a tomb of sorts, is still strange, but such conjecture carries with it some evidence. Such as the common articles found in the pyramids indicating a burial(and "spiritual journey to the other side"), smaller pyramids for the pharaoh's wives, etc. Yet there is no evidence of aliens, space crafts, etc.

A medium-sized aardvark flying a space craft, creating and enlightening civilisations all over the galaxy is as plausible.

with the exception of the "silly nonsense" part, i more or less agree with that.  granted, we will probably never find out exactly why, or how, the pyramids were built.  but there is a lot more evidence to indicate they were built by humans than not. 

Angels are not silly nonsense, planeden?

i thought you were an angel?  or have i just been listening to pdela too much?

Hilarious!

The great pyramid of giza was not built by man, it was not meant for man and certainly is not a tomb, as none of the others were. Man created god, god did not create man! As i said before the notion of angels, gods etc only came about during greek times when they were looking for words to describe the anunnaki, clueless religious fanatics have since totally obscured the original knowledge of where we came from.There is a lot of material to get through so  Im just gonna give you all some chunks of information that you can chew on starting with this... Far back in time the solar system was in disarray, the planets did not have a true orbit in the solar system and there were many collisions, this was due to the gravitational pulls of a planet called Tiamat. Tiamat was located between venus and mars (earth wasnt there yet) and had 11 satellites of its own. This is all recorded in sumerian texts 6000yrs ago in almost autobigraphical; terms by en.ki, one of the anunnaki, who is identifiable in all other cultures and appears in the bible as the serpent in the garden of eden. It was at this time that a stray planet (nibiru to the sumerians, marduk to the babylonians etc) entered our solar system, presumably after its own star had died, and as it did so got drawn into a collision course with Tiamat. The Sumerian texts speak of how almost as two warriors the two planets gathered around them weapons (satellites) and faced off in a celestial battle. on the first collision Tiamat was cracked in two, on the second orbit one half was smashed into pieces creating the asteroid belt along with many comets, and the intact half found a new orbit and became earth taking one of Tiamats satellites with it (kingu) which became the moon. (notice the craters?) This should explain why earth only had land on one half of the planet as the rest would have been underneath the crust or interior on Tiamat. As earth found its orbit, it naturally had, days months and seasons, In genesis it talks of how god created night and day, i have explained this, how god seperated the land from the sea... as earth found its new orbit it was still highly volatile with lots of vol;canic activity, creating mountains and new land, thus seperating land from the sea.

I have now shown that god was actually a planet, a planet that returns once every 3600 years the crossing planet as it is sometimes called, its symbol unsurprisingly was the cross, or as a winged disc which is found in many ancient artworks. Nibiru is the home planet of the anunnaki and it is now easy to see that in reality once every 3600 years (1 year to the anunnaki) it is a relatively short hop to earth.

We are still only at the tip of the iceberg here but that should give you something to think on for now. P.S. im quite pleased with number of posts im getting already, Thanks guys.

I agree that is funny. However things were done in stages. Look at where we are at today, in a relatively short period of time. I believe in evolution, however if you follow the evolution of life on this planet, us, homo-sapien should not be here for another 2 million years or so.

You haven't "shown" anything. As Gendowlyn said: "Ah! that is clearly metaphysical speculation, and like most metaphysical speculations has very little reference at all to the actual facts of real life, as we know them."

You can speculate all =you like but i have presented this as fact, you are free to now go and find more evidence of this. some people will always refuse to believe despite overwhelming evidence. that is your choice however most people will see the truth. more to come.

I was quite suspicious of what you call "evidence", and now what you call a "fact" is doubtful. If you read Summarian, and do comparitive religious studies, you would even be closer to a "theory", than you are now in reading some one's translation.

You are free now to go and find one bit of evidence to support your imagination

I actually have read much in the realms of religious philosophy, ancient history etc, I cannot read the sumerian cuneiform script myself however i have compared many translations on the matter where all scholars agree and i tend to believe people who have put 50 years of research in when it is backed up by others especially when my own findings confirmed many things before i had read much of what i have now. People fear what they dont understand and hate what they cant conquer. From the very beginning which i outlined earlier there is a coherent line that is easy to follow if you know what you are looking  for, from the sumerians through the babylonians, the hittites the egyptians, greeks romans, mayans, incans etc pick a subject i will help alleviate the years of conditioning you are clearly a victim of.

Please stop with assuming I'm propagandized. You're the one putting forth the notion that the bible is wrong, not because it's obviously silly, but because of it being misread. Then you come to the rescue vomiting Anunnaki poop, without even presenting evidence, just your own whimsical imagination. You act like you're helping me to understand, but in reality there is little you understand.

For instance, why would Summarian texts be truthful? I don't even know the damned Summerians. They could have just been recording texts of folklore, morality plays, or political treatises on how to calm the masses for control over them. We have enough of that poop today. And we definitely have enough used-story salesmen to last another 3600 years.

Who wouldn't like an interesting historical narrative of our planet? You don't have one. You failed the historical fantasy-detector--no evidence. No planet. No physical traces. No first-hand eyewitness testimony. Nothing. Your imagination seems to thrive in empty space

I'm aware of the Gilgamesh saga. What I don't understand how it is physically possible for a planet orbiting a star that dies to somehow travel to our solar system and establish an orbit around our sun, in such a way that it would collide twice with some big planet in our solar system.

If the original star died, that planet would not spontaniously loose it's orbit. If a star dies, it only means the nuclear processes that generate energy die out. The result is a white dwarf, neutron star or a black hole. These objects can still keep planets in their orbit.

I simply don't see how a rogue planet originating in another solar system can be captured by our sun, unless it had some kind of engine or spiritual force guiding it.

50 years of studying by whatever amount of people doesn't make something true.

Bex1p, may I ask, how did you come to be interested in believing these stories?

You clearly dont know the sumerians considering you struggle to spell it despite the fact that i have written it a hundred times so far so how can you assume that you have any idea of what they knew. The truth is out there why dont you use your initiative. It is not the fact that the bible is mi9sread though im suree in many cases it is, it is because the bible is the result of 6000 years of chinese whispers without the obvious manipulation by the powers that be in order to brainwash the likes of your good self by stringing you along with elements of the truth, you clearly dont know what you are talking about on this subject otherwise you would provide a reasonable argument, i suggest you do some research and come back. Zecharia Sitchin is a good place to start. When you have seen some of the Sumerian Scriptures\artifects and have any idea what they represent you will see how they speak for themselves but it is futile to try to teach a man that has never heard of the place. In 1983 NASA admitted that there is another large planet past pluto, didnt know that either did you. Wise up lest you get left behind...

Fair enough. Heres a little nugget, in 1531 a map came to light that was drawn on gazelle hide. This map showed areas of south america and africa that were yet to be explored (though we know better)  by "the old world" with perfect accuracy, not only that it, showed the land mass of the arctic underneath the polar caps! There werent people on the earth that could travel high enough to map the topography of these areas but even if we could how could we map the land beneath the ice that has been there for 2 million years. We have only recently developed the ice penetrating radio equipment that proves this map to be accurate. That alone is sufficient evidence for me without the wealth of other information. Heres another, The original giza pyramids not to mention other sites across the world are perfectly aligned with orions belt, and shafts in the pyramid align up with one particular star, Sirius, once a year i believe, though it may be longer than that. This particular star was impossible to see with the naked eye and with no telescopes to speak of how was this done? Likewise how were the sumerians able to map the solar system, and create the calender and the zodiac (the number 12 being very relevant)  when modern scientists have really only just discovered anything past saturn. This is without all the ancient depictions of "astronauts" and their craft. The truth is far more compelling than the fiction. How were mountains levelled off, and what were the nazca lines put there for by ancient peoples, When to see them how they were intended to be seen you would have to be above the mountains. I can tell you thaat for me to go to so much effort there would have to be a hell of a good reason.

Sirius is the brightest star in the sky. As you try to regurgitate what you've heard and read, you are confusing yourself.

Also the vatican have admitted that the "ancient alien" theory is plausible, like they havent known the whole time. Which to me is a treat because in that statement they basically said that they dont believe anything that they have said the last 2000 years. Sounds like they are trying to have their cake and eat it.