yes indeed.
nothing to see here
Sort:
A planet eating star such as the sun ,seen by hubble & recreated by Nasa
Bex1p wrote:
The other is of the sun trysts though i dont know what the other object is.
Not true:
http://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/hubble/science/planet-eater.html
soldierpiper wrote:
For Trysts.
For von Daniken believers:
http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Erich_von_D%C3%A4niken
Von Daniken is a huge fraud....man sees aliens everywhere
I wouldnt say von daniken is a fraud, he has followed up the work of sitchin and as a man who is knowledgable of history, architecture and all things celestial truly believes as i do that mankind has been guided by the anunnaki in the light of so much evidence which he has presented and none of which has yet been satisfactorily disputed.
rooperi wrote:
Bex1p wrote:
The other is of the sun trysts though i dont know what the other object is.
Not true:
http://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/hubble/science/planet-eater.html
My mistake, very interesting, thanks for the link.
Bex1p wrote:
I wouldnt say von daniken is a fraud, he has followed up the work of sitchin and as a man who is knowledgable of history, architecture and all things celestial truly believes as i do that mankind has been guided by the anunnaki in the light of so much evidence which he has presented and none of which has yet been satisfactorily disputed.
The thing with a theory or hypothesis is, you have to satisfactorily prove it, not claim it's true because it has hasn't been satisfactorily disputed.
It's the whole Celestial Teapot thing.... It's easy to make claims which cannot be disputed. Religions have been doing that for millenia.
rooperi wrote:
soldierpiper wrote:
For Trysts.
For von Daniken believers:
As for that link, it completely misses the point, this waqs written by somebody that is angry at von danniken because he didnt ubderstand his work or more precisely sitchins work, i myself havent read any of von dannikens books but have seen many interviews with him, and the "points" that here are designed to show him up are actually true, i could explain to the person who wrote that article the things he did not understand.
rooperi wrote:
Bex1p wrote:
I wouldnt say von daniken is a fraud, he has followed up the work of sitchin and as a man who is knowledgable of history, architecture and all things celestial truly believes as i do that mankind has been guided by the anunnaki in the light of so much evidence which he has presented and none of which has yet been satisfactorily disputed.
The thing with a theory or hypothesis is, you have to satisfactorily prove it, not claim it's true because it has hasn't been satisfactorily disputed.
It's the whole Celestial Teapot thing.... It's easy to make claims which cannot be disputed. Religions have been doing that for millenia.
i know of the celestial teapot as i have studied much philosophy.
The point is that many claims have been made and much much evidence presented as proof, i believe that i have presented much proof in this thread, for anyone to claim that it is wrong or fraudulent they must provide a reasonable explaination as to why this is so and to date nobody has done this, they just say things like "wouldnt aliens have built something better than the pyramids" without taking the time to review all of the evidence as to why they built the pyramids or what for, this is just one example out of many.
Bex1p wrote:
This is a sumerian clay cylinder scroll, the image was made by rolling the cylinder into wet clay, an ingenious method of reproducing many copies of the same image, you could say it was the worlds first printing press, and for more interesting than anything trysts has to say or lack thereof.
youd think the anunaki would have a biz hub or at least a zerox machine
I rest my case.
Von Daniken is not a huge fraud ,he is a serious researcher & has helped uncover our lost history.
Bex1p wrote: i know of the celestial teapot as i have studied much philosophy.
The point is that many claims have been made and much much evidence presented as proof, i believe that i have presented much proof in this thread, for anyone to claim that it is wrong or fraudulent they must provide a reasonable explaination as to why this is so and to date nobody has done this, they just say things like "wouldnt aliens have built something better than the pyramids" without taking the time to review all of the evidence as to why they built the pyramids or what for, this is just one example out of many.
The other is of the sun trysts though i dont know what the other object is.