Blocklist

Sort:
Avatar of DiogenesDue
Problem5826 wrote:

Come on now. Go back in your own topic. You've literally made a point of discussing who you've blocked and why.

Guy's name is Peet something or other.

You're apparently unaware that "Peet" is either muted or banned...his posts are gone.  What a shocker wink.png.

Avatar of Problem5826
btickler wrote:
Problem5826 wrote:

Come on now. Go back in your own topic. You've literally made a point of discussing who you've blocked and why.

Guy's name is Peet something or other.

You're apparently unaware that "Peet" is either muted or banned...his posts are gone.  What a shocker .

 

Even more lame.

Avatar of DiogenesDue
Problem5826 wrote:

Even more lame.

Luckily, you've shown up just as Peet disappeared, to carry the torch until his triumphant return.

Avatar of CrusaderKing1
btickler wrote:
Problem5826 wrote:

Even more lame.

Luckily, you've shown up just as Peet disappeared, to carry the torch until his triumphant return.

Never hurts to have someone oppose the commonplace opinion that victimhood is good. I think his whole point was that blocking people in mass is probably not worth bragging about, to which I would agree.

Avatar of RonaldJosephCote

   What do you mean.."in mass"?  There's 37 million members on this site. I have about 200 friends,...and have blocked about 200. That means there's 36.5 million members I've never encountered.  Its either a Catholic joke....."in mass"  or a Geographical reference....in Mass. Can I block myself, because I DO reside in Massachusetts.happy.png

Avatar of DiogenesDue
RonaldJosephCote wrote:

   What do you mean.."in mass"?  There's 37 million members on this site. I have about 200 friends,...and have blocked about 200. That means there's 36.5 million members I've never encountered.

He means "en masse". 

Avatar of RonaldJosephCote

  T.Y...lol wink.png

Avatar of CrusaderKing1
btickler wrote:
RonaldJosephCote wrote:

   What do you mean.."in mass"?  There's 37 million members on this site. I have about 200 friends,...and have blocked about 200. That means there's 36.5 million members I've never encountered.

He means "en masse". 

Either are acceptable.

Avatar of CrusaderKing1
RonaldJosephCote wrote:

   What do you mean.."in mass"?  There's 37 million members on this site. I have about 200 friends,...and have blocked about 200. That means there's 36.5 million members I've never encountered.  Its either a Catholic joke....."in mass"  or a Geographical reference....in Mass. Can I block myself, because I DO reside in Massachusetts.

I didn't say you can't do that, if you want to block people, go for it. I'm just stating that bragging about it is rather childish. Feel free to agree to disagree. 

Avatar of RonaldJosephCote

     I'd have to agree...... so we've come full circle....happy.png                                                                     

Avatar of PerpetualPatzer123
CrusaderKing1 wrote:
btickler wrote:
RonaldJosephCote wrote:

   What do you mean.."in mass"?  There's 37 million members on this site. I have about 200 friends,...and have blocked about 200. That means there's 36.5 million members I've never encountered.

He means "en masse". 

Either are acceptable.

No.

Avatar of CrusaderKing1
AunTheKnight wrote:
CrusaderKing1 wrote:
btickler wrote:
RonaldJosephCote wrote:

   What do you mean.."in mass"?  There's 37 million members on this site. I have about 200 friends,...and have blocked about 200. That means there's 36.5 million members I've never encountered.

He means "en masse". 

Either are acceptable.

No.

 

yes.

mass - pertaining to, involving, or affecting a large number of people.

en masse - in a group; altogether

Avatar of Problem5826
btickler wrote:
Problem5826 wrote:

Even more lame.

Luckily, you've shown up just as Peet disappeared, to carry the torch until his triumphant return.

 

Is your name "dragon"?

If not, why are speaking for him, and rushed into the thread.

I know why lol.

Mate you are twice my age. Should be reconsidering things. I'll tolerate it to a degree.

Have some manners and let the fellow speak for himself.

Avatar of PerpetualPatzer123
CrusaderKing1 wrote:
AunTheKnight wrote:
CrusaderKing1 wrote:
btickler wrote:
RonaldJosephCote wrote:

   What do you mean.."in mass"?  There's 37 million members on this site. I have about 200 friends,...and have blocked about 200. That means there's 36.5 million members I've never encountered.

He means "en masse". 

Either are acceptable.

No.

 

yes.

mass - pertaining to, involving, or affecting a large number of people.

en masse - in a group; altogether

Right, but "en masse" is a phrase. You cannot change it. You could say "in a mass," but "in mass" is incorrect, I believe.

Avatar of Problem5826
AunTheKnight wrote:
CrusaderKing1 wrote:
AunTheKnight wrote:
CrusaderKing1 wrote:
btickler wrote:
RonaldJosephCote wrote:

   What do you mean.."in mass"?  There's 37 million members on this site. I have about 200 friends,...and have blocked about 200. That means there's 36.5 million members I've never encountered.

He means "en masse". 

Either are acceptable.

No.

 

yes.

mass - pertaining to, involving, or affecting a large number of people.

en masse - in a group; altogether

Right, but "en masse" is a phrase. You cannot change it. You could say "in a mass," but "in mass" is incorrect, I believe.

 

I watched a bunch of 14 year olds get crazy excited on here about me skim reading.

Get over it real quick is my advice.

Avatar of Qu33n-Eclipsa

The world

Avatar of Problem5826

Going on for pages about a spelling error rather than content lol

Avatar of DiogenesDue
Problem5826 wrote:
btickler wrote:
Problem5826 wrote:

Even more lame.

Luckily, you've shown up just as Peet disappeared, to carry the torch until his triumphant return.

 

Is your name "dragon"?

If not, why are speaking for him, and rushed into the thread.

I know why lol.

Mate you are twice my age. Should be reconsidering things. I'll tolerate it to a degree.

Have some manners and let the fellow speak for himself.

I fail to see how I am speaking for the OP, nor can discern how I "rushed into the thread" compared to your own mode of entry...

Physician, heal thyself.

Avatar of Qu33n-Eclipsa

Lol

Avatar of CrusaderKing1
AunTheKnight wrote:
CrusaderKing1 wrote:
AunTheKnight wrote:
CrusaderKing1 wrote:
btickler wrote:
RonaldJosephCote wrote:

   What do you mean.."in mass"?  There's 37 million members on this site. I have about 200 friends,...and have blocked about 200. That means there's 36.5 million members I've never encountered.

He means "en masse". 

Either are acceptable.

No.

 

yes.

mass - pertaining to, involving, or affecting a large number of people.

en masse - in a group; altogether

Right, but "en masse" is a phrase. You cannot change it. You could say "in a mass," but "in mass" is incorrect, I believe.

"in mass" is not a phrase, but it is grammatically correct. I used the words correctly, get over it. 

This forum topic has been locked