TheHarbingerOfDoom wrote:
I really cannot be bothered to read all this. So can someone sum up what they’ve been arguing about for me?
We aren't arguing we are debating
chess.com is shockingly similar to reddit
Sort:
QuickV wrote:
And now, @Just_A_Guy_Without_A_Head will probably stay offline forever .-.
Since you did nothing contributive I don't understand where your attitude is coming from lol
gooegle wrote:
M1m1c15 wrote:
Ok listen very carefully, you are allowed to have your opinion on and are allowed to state it no matter what, it doesn’t matter that it might hurt someone. I’m not saying it’s a good thing however people have the right to say whatever they want. If someone asks you for your opinion about something, and you give it to them and they don’t like it it is not your fault that they chose to react that way
That true- you are allowed to state it s long as it isn't specifically said to hurt someone
But when you say something racist, homophobic, etc. that is specifically trying to hurt someone.
Feb 6, 2022
0
#125
TheHarbingerOfDoom wrote:
I really cannot be bothered to read all this. So can someone sum up what they’ve been arguing about for me?
So basically just a guy and m1m1c are arguing about whether you can say something thats homophobic or something
gooegle wrote:
TheHarbingerOfDoom wrote:
I really cannot be bothered to read all this. So can someone sum up what they’ve been arguing about for me?
So basically just a guy and m1m1c are arguing about whether you can say something thats homophobic or something
No that's not it at all.
We are not "arguing". We are having a friendly debate about if homophobia is hate speech.
Just_A_Guy_Without_A_Head wrote:
QuickV wrote:
And now, @Just_A_Guy_Without_A_Head will probably stay offline forever .-.
Since you did nothing contributive I don't understand where your attitude is coming from lol
Your account stats 
Thats basically what I was trying to say