But yours was too plain. Too obvious.
Controversial Topic (Creation vs Evolution 2?)
Sort:
Aug 22, 2019
0
#1083
HolographWars escribió:
But yours was too plain. Too obvious.
Because I'm honest.
Does any1 even remember me lmao
Ginarook wrote:
The best thing that can be done is to lock this !
Finally we can agree on something.
One thing you haven't known the whole time:
I am for evolution.
This is Creation vs Evolution.
So I think we both agree.
TheBestBeer_Root wrote:
And I am getting a mod to close this thread.
#4 - No religious or political debate or commentary in the regular forums. Religion and politics are important and deeply personal, but Chess.com is a friendly community where we come together around a common love for chess and debating these two topics tend to pull people apart. If you would like to discuss religion or politics, you may do so in many of the private clubs on Chess.com.
.....can be found on Erik’s locked thread on rules under this topic
Erik’s been notified, contacted David the moderator, yet hasn’t returned to site in four days so hopefully soon he return and stop the nonsense that never should’ve began according to the owner of chess.com because is causes insults and separation.
By erik:
There are a few simple rules for content and pictures on Chess.com:
#1 - Respect others. Do not be mean.
#2 - No profanity, swearing, or inappropriate language or topics.
#3 - No pictures of violence or gore, that are sexually provocative, or which promote intolerance.
#4 - No religious or political debate or commentary in the regular forums. Religion and politics are important and deeply personal, but Chess.com is a friendly community where we come together around a common love for chess and debating these two topics tend to pull people apart. If you would like to discuss religion or politics, you may do so in many of the private clubs on Chess.com.
Aug 22, 2019
0
#1088
One-million-games wrote:
Does any1 even remember me lmao
this is evolution? may the creator help us!
https://www.chess.com/forum/view/off-topic/who-remembers-me
https://www.chess.com/forum/view/off-topic/im-back-1
USArmyParatrooper wrote:
jaredjm wrote:
USArmyParatrooper wrote:
checkmatemark04 wrote:
God is powerful enough, but he will not force any human to make a choice. The choice is up to you.
If I show you a red pen, and that causes you to believe the red pen exists, did I force you to make a choice? If I show you convincing evidence that Sacramento is the capital of California, and you in turn are convinced, did I force you to make a choice? No. So that explanation doesn’t fly.
lol that is such a bad analogy
So bad in fact that you were unable to explain HOW it is a bad analogy?
Lol you're still waiting for your answer XD Here it is:
If I choose to deny that the red pen exists, does that mean that it does not? If I choose to denounce your convincing evidence that Sacramento is the capital of California, does that mean that it is not?
Sorry for answering a question with a question, but you get my point, right?
Can't we just agree to disagree? 
There really is no point to this forum anymore lol. It's been reduced to silly pointless exchanges and like Gina has insinuated before, no one here will even consider changing their beliefs (or lack of belief) just because of what someone else on an online game forum says.
let us not forgit. u cant apply the scientific method to proving theres a god. well, i have some sick sad & sorry <3breaking news 4many of our readers out there in Mister Chess Dot Comland. guess wut ? u cant apply the SM to the Big Bang nor any other origin-based universe concept either. imagine that ! drats (snap) !
now wut ??
Aug 23, 2019
0
#1092
Thee_Ghostess_Lola wrote:
let us not forget. you can't apply the scientific method to proving there's a god. well, I have some sick sad breaking news for many of our readers out there on Mister Chess Dot Comland. Guess what ? You cant apply the SM to the Big Bang nor any other origin-based universe concept either. imagine that !! Sorry.
now what ??
You can use the scientific method for any hypothesis. Why is the origin of the universe exempt? Just because we don't know something doesn't mean we have to turn to religion or non-scientific means of finding an answer, because that will mean the answer you come up with doesn't have any evidence to support it, if it did, then you could use scientific means.
Same with god. No scientific evidence shows there's a god, suggesting there's no logical reason to believe in a god.
You can use the scientific method for any hypothesis.
Ohhh, u can use it, but it hasnt passed the test. and 99.99% never will in our lifetimes. IOW's there's no logical reason to believe (as u say) that the Big Bang happened as it cannot be proven by means of the scientific method.
Sorry (not sorry) that u trapped urself. as a raccoon u can let go a the bait now. lol !!
Aug 23, 2019
0
#1094
Thee_Ghostess_Lola wrote:
You can use the scientific method for any hypothesis.
Oh, you can use it, but it hasn't passed the test. and 99.99% never will in our lifetimes. IOW's there's no logical reason to believe (as you say) that the Big Bang happened as it cannot be proven by means of the scientific method.
Sorry (not sorry) that you trapped yourself. as a raccoon you can let go a the bait now. lol !!
We know the big bang happened due to us using scientific means to prove the universe is expanding and the red light shift and stuff. How it happened we don't know yet. We will know when we use scientific means to discover how ( if we ever do, but i'm optimistic).
Aug 23, 2019
0
#1095
Thee_Ghostess_Lola escribió:
You can use the scientific method for any hypothesis.
Ohhh, u can use it, but it hasnt passed the test. and 99.99% never will in our lifetimes. IOW's there's no logical reason to believe (as u say) that the Big Bang happened as it cannot be proven by means of the scientific method.
Sorry (not sorry) that u trapped urself. as a raccoon u can let go a the bait now. lol !!
Except for the red shift we see on galaxies, the microwave background, the ratio between hydrogen and helium present on the universe due to nucleosynthesis shortly after the Big Bang and other evidence that I don't recall right now.
Aug 23, 2019
0
#1096
Prometheus_Fuschs wrote:
Thee_Ghostess_Lola escribió:
You can use the scientific method for any hypothesis.
Ohhh, u can use it, but it hasnt passed the test. and 99.99% never will in our lifetimes. IOW's there's no logical reason to believe (as u say) that the Big Bang happened as it cannot be proven by means of the scientific method.
Sorry (not sorry) that u trapped urself. as a raccoon u can let go a the bait now. lol !!
Except for the red shift we see on galaxies, the microwave background, the ratio between hydrogen and helium present on the universe due to nucleosynthesis shortly after the Big Bang and other evidence that I don't recall right now.
The cooling of the universe as well.
We know the big bang happened
N.O U D.O N.O.T !!
Except for the red shift we see on galaxies, the microwave background, the ratio between hydrogen and helium present on the universe due to nucleosynthesis shortly after the Big Bang and other evidence that I don't recall right now.
Then show me that the Scientific Method has accepted that - u beauzeau ! see ?....u cant ! (nows about the time u need to save urself the agony of embarrassment & admit that u know nothing-nothing about the wayz-n-means of the SM)
The cooling of the universe as well.
u too june bug jones. stop acting as if u were recruited 4da wavy gravy parade.
Aug 23, 2019
0
#1100
Junebug444 escribió:
Prometheus_Fuschs wrote:
Thee_Ghostess_Lola escribió:
You can use the scientific method for any hypothesis.
Ohhh, u can use it, but it hasnt passed the test. and 99.99% never will in our lifetimes. IOW's there's no logical reason to believe (as u say) that the Big Bang happened as it cannot be proven by means of the scientific method.
Sorry (not sorry) that u trapped urself. as a raccoon u can let go a the bait now. lol !!
Except for the red shift we see on galaxies, the microwave background, the ratio between hydrogen and helium present on the universe due to nucleosynthesis shortly after the Big Bang and other evidence that I don't recall right now.
The cooling of the universe as well.
That's more of an effect of entropy.
#1 - Respect others. Do not be mean.
As if you weren't mean...
Have any quotes?
"It is bad simply cause, where did you go to school? 🙄 "
That is background criticism, not insulting deliberately for evil intent.
It is an insult, it is also criticism, it's both.
It is the latter, but not the former. It is attacking the basis of where claims come from.
It's both, the remark is of no use in here but to question the oponents intellect which is indeed what I did.