I just noticed several flaws in the explanation above
Cotton is falling from the sky

(1)4 x (1)10, so if x marks the spot, than the answer is between 1 multiplied by 4 and 1 multiplied by 10. 1 times 4 is 5 because we have a 1 and a 4 on the left side of the equation. Here's the math worked out:
(1)4 x (1)10 = y
(1)4x + (10)1 = y
(10)1 = y - (1)4x
(10)1 - y = -(1)4x
-(10)1 + y = (1)4x
[-(10)1 + y]/4 = x
-(10).25 + y/4 = x
(1)4[-(10).25 + y/4] + (10)1 = y
59 + 10 + y = 2y
69 + y = 2y
y = 69 therefore 4 x 10 is equal to 69
WHAT!?!?!?
So at the top it means the answer has to be between 4 and 10, and 69 is not between 4 and 0
Flaw 1: (1)4 x (1)10, so if x marks the spot, than the answer is between 1 multiplied by 4 and 1 multiplied by 10. First thing about it is that it's not how you multiply. Second thing about it is that 69 doesn't even fit inside that range.
Flaw 2: 1 times 4 is 5 because we have a 1 and a 4 on the left side of the equation. The only thing wrong about it is because that's adding, not multiplying.

(1)4 x (1)10, so if x marks the spot, than the answer is between 1 multiplied by 4 and 1 multiplied by 10. 1 times 4 is 5 because we have a 1 and a 4 on the left side of the equation. Here's the math worked out:
(1)4 x (1)10 = y
(1)4x + (10)1 = y
(10)1 = y - (1)4x
(10)1 - y = -(1)4x
-(10)1 + y = (1)4x
[-(10)1 + y]/4 = x
-(10).25 + y/4 = x
(1)4[-(10).25 + y/4] + (10)1 = y
59 + 10 + y = 2y
69 + y = 2y
y = 69 therefore 4 x 10 is equal to 69
WHAT!?!?!?
So at the top it means the answer has to be between 4 and 10, and 69 is not between 4 and 0
The answer is the combination of numbers between 4 and 10. It's obviously a double digit number as the answer

I just noticed several flaws in the explanation above
lol Do you understand my posts yet?

(1)4 x (1)10, so if x marks the spot, than the answer is between 1 multiplied by 4 and 1 multiplied by 10. 1 times 4 is 5 because we have a 1 and a 4 on the left side of the equation. Here's the math worked out:
(1)4 x (1)10 = y
(1)4x + (10)1 = y
(10)1 = y - (1)4x
(10)1 - y = -(1)4x
-(10)1 + y = (1)4x
[-(10)1 + y]/4 = x
-(10).25 + y/4 = x
(1)4[-(10).25 + y/4] + (10)1 = y
59 + 10 + y = 2y
69 + y = 2y
y = 69 therefore 4 x 10 is equal to 69
WHAT!?!?!?
So at the top it means the answer has to be between 4 and 10, and 69 is not between 4 and 0
The answer is the combination of numbers between 4 and 10. It's obviously a double digit number as the answer
10 is not in the middle of 4 and 10, it is 10

I think this post is just a joke tbh so we are saying illogical things... It's obviously 40
4 and 0 are not between 4-10. Using Kent's Second Law of Ascending Digits, we can determine that the ones and tens place both contain whole numbers between 4-10

(1)4 x (1)10, so if x marks the spot, than the answer is between 1 multiplied by 4 and 1 multiplied by 10. 1 times 4 is 5 because we have a 1 and a 4 on the left side of the equation. Here's the math worked out:
(1)4 x (1)10 = y
(1)4x + (10)1 = y
(10)1 = y - (1)4x
(10)1 - y = -(1)4x
-(10)1 + y = (1)4x
[-(10)1 + y]/4 = x
-(10).25 + y/4 = x
(1)4[-(10).25 + y/4] + (10)1 = y
59 + 10 + y = 2y
69 + y = 2y
y = 69 therefore 4 x 10 is equal to 69
WHAT!?!?!?
So at the top it means the answer has to be between 4 and 10, and 69 is not between 4 and 0
The answer is the combination of numbers between 4 and 10. It's obviously a double digit number as the answer
10 is not in the middle of 4 and 10, it is 10
6 is between 4 and 10
9 is between 4 and 10. I don't see what your point is

Lol this post lasted an hour and we've been debating this the whole time yet none of our answers were correct

Lol none of you have solved it right yet
I have. 69 is the answer. According to Dell's Laws of Descending Fractions, digits between 50.024 and 77.329 are more commonly occurring in one by two multiplications

Lol none of you have solved it right yet
I have. 69 is the answer. According to Dell's Laws of Descending Fractions, digits between 50.024 and 77.329 are more commonly occurring in one by two multiplications
It may be more commonly, but it's not 100%

40x10= the amount of reason pedestrians and soviets are better than cyclists
YESSSSS
I think this post is just a joke tbh so we are saying illogical things... It's obviously 40