Here's something Covid related...
No more paid leave for Amazon workers. 
https://www.yahoo.com/finance/news/amazon-ends-covid-paid-leave-042549451.html
Covid-19 Discussion (moderated)
Sort:
btickler wrote:
chamo2074 wrote:
"Power BI is an interactive data visualization software product developed by Microsoft with primary focus on business intelligence. It is part of the Microsoft Power Platform."
It utilizes data from drees which is extremely reliable from May 2021 so it does not only take omicron-related statistics into consideration.
Omicron is the current variant, and only new variants coming are considered omicron sub-variants. They're getting more transmissible but also much less deadly. If the vaccine used to be efficient, the truth is that it's not that efficient anymore with the omicron variant. Why exactly should we never have reached omicron? Was the virus supposed to get eradicated with better gesture? Maybe questioning the gesture of the pandemic is reasonable.
"Boosters specifically targeting Omicron are not due until August or after...so this is fairly misleading"
Well, at the same time, people are jobless because they didn't inject a vaccine that's experimental and non-specific to the current wave. In France they're considering implementing 'placement' which allows the authorities to move unvaccinated people from their houses. The atrocities we're seeing is insane. If COVID caused damage, this is causing as much damage. 5M deaths? I wonder how many people are going to find themselves jobless because they refused a vaccine to protect people from a virus that currently has a 0.1% fatality rate (last 28 days according to John Hopkins, probably even less because of under-reported asymptomatic cases) and that is not doing a good job at all at preventing transmission.
I would not be in favor of "placement" measures ala leper colonies, either. That's an unethical road to take.
I used to manage a business intelligence team, so I was more concerned about the content than the platform itself. If this data is taken from Drees, is it available online directly from Drees? Etc.
Glad we agree on the first point at least. Not sure it will make any difference though with the same party reelected in France they might go for it, and many countries might follow (Canada, Australia, some EU countries, etc...)
As for the second point:
"This data is updated many times a day"
That's what I found on the menu.
By the way, about ethics, and specifically bioethics:
http://portal.unesco.org/en/ev.php-URL_ID=31058&URL_DO=DO_TOPIC&URL_SECTION=201.html
Universal Declaration on Bioethics and Human Rights
""
Article 3 – Human dignity and human rights
1. Human dignity, human rights and fundamental freedoms are to be fully respected.
2. The interests and welfare of the individual should have priority over the sole interest of science or society.
Article 6 – Consent
1. Any preventive, diagnostic and therapeutic medical intervention is only to be carried out with the prior, free and informed consent of the person concerned, based on adequate information. The consent should, where appropriate, be express and may be withdrawn by the person concerned at any time and for any reason without disadvantage or prejudice.
2. Scientific research should only be carried out with the prior, free, express and informed consent of the person concerned. The information should be adequate, provided in a comprehensible form and should include modalities for withdrawal of consent. Consent may be withdrawn by the person concerned at any time and for any reason without any disadvantage or prejudice. Exceptions to this principle should be made only in accordance with ethical and legal standards adopted by States, consistent with the principles and provisions set out in this Declaration, in particular in Article 27, and international human rights law.
3. In appropriate cases of research carried out on a group of persons or a community, additional agreement of the legal representatives of the group or community concerned may be sought. In no case should a collective community agreement or the consent of a community leader or other authority substitute for an individual’s informed consent.
Article 7 – Persons without the capacity to consent
In accordance with domestic law, special protection is to be given to persons who do not have the capacity to consent:
(a) authorization for research and medical practice should be obtained in accordance with the best interest of the person concerned and in accordance with domestic law. However, the person concerned should be involved to the greatest extent possible in the decision-making process of consent, as well as that of withdrawing consent;
(b) research should only be carried out for his or her direct health benefit, subject to the authorization and the protective conditions prescribed by law, and if there is no research alternative of comparable effectiveness with research participants able to consent (alternate drugs). Research which does not have potential direct health benefit should only be undertaken by way of exception, with the utmost restraint, exposing the person only to a minimal risk and minimal burden and, if the research is expected to contribute to the health benefit of other persons in the same category, subject to the conditions prescribed by law and compatible with the protection of the individual’s human rights. Refusal of such persons to take part in research should be respected.
"
chamo2074 wrote:
1. Well, at the same time, people are jobless because they didn't inject a vaccine that's experimental and non-specific to the current wave.
2. 5M deaths? I wonder how many people are going to find themselves jobless because they refused a vaccine to protect people from a virus that currently has a 0.1% fatality rate (last 28 days according to John Hopkins, probably even less because of under-reported asymptomatic cases) and that is not doing a good job at all at preventing transmission.
1. comparing jobs to the virus never works. on that, perhaps a history lesson is needed. every pandemic has changed how we live. this one has and there is no reason to think we will ever go back to how we were previously. that is a pipe dream based on the incorrect belief that "it will go away", or, deaths are so low, it doesn't matter. which is all political BS. also maybe look at unemployment numbers and other economic indicators of progress before making such a statement.
2. again, you compare jobs to death. then you use a statistic based on the last month of reporting to make some sort of case for jobs? really? one month for a virus that has been around 2+ years?
if a person refused the vaccine and lost their job, i have no sympathy for them. in a recent post you used the word 'experimental' referencing the shots. yeah, that ship has sailed. those anti-vaxxers saying we would all be dead in a year from the jab are now into other conspiracy theories.
finally, with all of your 'research', you must have stumbled on the fact that low vaccination rates equate to higher levels of variants. this is the most important factor in these discussions, in my opinion. for reference, see measles and polio.
am i being a little demeaning? yeah, but you post things like "experimental vaccine", and "5M deaths", as if that figure is wrong, or, should be minimized. by the way, the figure is over 6 million now. but, no need to pay attention. as long as you are employed.
p.s. please recognize how i quoted here. i suggest you and btickler cut the text you are not referencing. a wall of text requires the reader to determine which part you are referencing.
"cut the text you are not referencing" That's an excellent idea. I wish it could be enforced site-wide, not just this thread. 
@AlCzervik wrote:
"p.s. please recognize how i quoted here. i suggest you and btickler cut the text you are not referencing. a wall of text requires the reader to determine which part you are referencing."
Good idea, I'll use a slightly different way actually.
"comparing jobs to the virus never works"
I wasn't comparing jobs to viruses, I was comparing losing a job (by the way, the job contract gets suspended so it would be extremely difficult to get employed elsewhere if even possible, no remuneration included, no unemployment payment, no retirment payement.) to deaths. Losing a job might not get you immediate death but the way it affects one's life is not to be neglected. Do you think it's easy? How does one, in a difficult economic situation live after becoming jobless? How do they get money? How do they satiate their basic demands/rights?
" every pandemic has changed how we live. this one has and there is no reason to think we will ever go back to how we were previously."
It has changed the way we lived, with the development of online platforms and many people starting to open businesses online, etc... Does changing the way we live include basing apartheid on an injection? QR codes and all advanced technologies used in 'vaccine passport' (mandates) systems are going to end up being used by the authorities to control many more things. Do you really think this is normal?
"the incorrect belief that "it will go away""
It won't go away. It's either going to become a 'seasonal' disease/people are going to acquire immunity with vaccination/previous infections. Viruses have a history of developing more transmissible but less deadly variants, which is happening right now with omicron and its sub-variants.
" deaths are so low"
Well, other viruses are overlooked. If deaths are low, where exactly is the danger?
"also maybe look at unemployment numbers and other economic indicators of progress before making such a statement."
What are you talking about, many people are directly losing their jobs because of their vaccination status :
Translate. Many countries are using similar strategies.
"Again, you compare jobs to death. then you use a statistic based on the last month of reporting to make some sort of case for jobs? really? one month for a virus that has been around 2+ years"
It's not a direct comparison. "I wonder how many". But I mean not getting paid for an 'undetermined period of time' is not to be neglected.
I used one month to cover current-wave (omicron current subvariants) related statistics. I don't care if the mortality back with delta/alpha (or anything in-between) was higher. The point is that it's getting lower, and on track for when/if it turns into a seasonal disease.
"if a person refused the vaccine and lost their job, i have no sympathy for them. in a recent post you used the word 'experimental' referencing the shots. yeah, that ship has sailed. those anti-vaxxers saying we would all be dead in a year from the jab are now into other conspiracy theories. "
So unless you die, there is no problem? Myocarditis? Pericarditis? Guillem-Bare? etc... A considerable amount, say 0.02% of currently reported victims of extremely severe reactions after a dose is not enough for refusal? Experimental is inaccurate? Check for yourself:
https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/results?cond=COVID-19&term=Biological%3A+Pfizer%2FBioNTech+%28BNT162b2%29+&cntry=&state=&city=&dist=
Study type: Interventional (Clinical trial)
Study completion date: 2022-2023 depending on what you chose.
People who said we will all die are now considered conspiracy theorists. 'We will all die in a year'. I am not sure anyone with a right mind would make such a statement. If the vaccine is experimental it doesn't mean we will all die for injecting it into our bodies that's not the true fear. But excess deaths is going up along with vaccination campaigns:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YqTGD9LHe9g&t=1058s
Firm data starting from 17:30
"finally, with all of your 'research', you must have stumbled on the fact that low vaccination rates equate to higher levels of variants. this is the most important factor in these discussions, in my opinion. for reference, see measles and polio."
Polio and measles vaccines are made for children for what I know. Whatever you're referencing, please link it.
COVID just like those two is an ARN virus which keeps mutating but it concerns everyone and is mostly dangerous on eldrerly/people with diabetes or specific comorbidities. The latter two only concern children though.
What I have, from 'research' is COVID stats for countries based on vaccination rates:
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/17DtxIjv_G-bfez7FtDndJU8VRXkvo4f5/edit#gid=957191559
If I sort by cases per million, all time,(largest to smallest) here are the vaccination rates:
82.30%
79.20%
69.10%
58.10%
71.10%
69.60%
66.50%
50.70%
74.10%
69.20%82.30%
79.20%
69.10%
58.10%
71.10%
69.60%
66.50%
50.70%
74.10%
69.20%
PS: The goal set was 70% fully-vaccinated.
6.50%
5.90%
0.60%
14.10%
5.10%
12.40%
1.40%
6.40%
45.40%
48.90%
Here's the bottom 10.
If you don't see a reverse (which could be caused by under-reporting in less developed countries), how can you see efficacy?
PS: Unfortunate, but I have to give access to X gmail account.
I sometimes cut away everything but the exact points I am responding to, and I sometimes reply inline in blue text, but I almost always cut away the top portion that has the previous post being replied to.
I do it this way for a specific reason...it's the least amount of text that preserves the post I am replying to in its entirety. This neuters later deletions or editing shenanigans.
I thought 1 vaccine will do it. This is a stubborn little bug. We're gonna need several vaccines. 
https://www.yahoo.com/news/future-covid-variants-will-likely-reinfect-us-multiple-times-a-year-experts-say-unless-we-invest-in-new-vaccines-121959797.html
May 17, 2022
0
#3850
I got shots and a couple months later I tested positive for Covid-19 and pneumonia.
May 18, 2022
0
#3851
There'll be variants too.
But that doesn't mean one shouldn't get vaccinated.
And people can try and spam "vaccination doesn't stop the spread".
Yes it does. How would a killed virus be contagious?
It would be like saying "cooking food doesn't kill contagious bacteria and viruses on it and in it"
And its dangerous. 'Knocking' vaccination. Probaby has cost many lives.
Including because of anti-vaccination leaders like Mercola.
People like him will take advantage of the nuances and the technical side.
Vaccination never 'guaranteed' not getting Covid.
But fact is - you're 97 times as likely to die from Covid if you're unvaccinated as compared to being 'fully vaccinated'.
The meaning of 'fully vaccinated' may change - because of the nature of Covid variants and booster shots.
And the anti-vax people will take advantage of that -
causing more deaths by treating the whole issue as if it was a political issue or like lawyers posturing in front of a jury.
wsswan wrote:
I got shots and a couple months later I tested positive for Covid-19 and pneumonia.
and...
what is your point? if it is that you still got sick, well, that happens. the vaccines might have saved you.
to be sure, any attempt at saying the vaccines do not work has been proven wrong many, many times. those people that said they were magnetized, or that there was some secret bill gates chip in the shot(s), where are they now?
how about all those that said us getting vaccinated were guinea pigs and would die?
rhetorical questions. we know where they are.
May 19, 2022
0
#3853
The point I was making was the shots lowered my chance of croaking but did not make me immune.
A flu shot won't make you immune......you can still get the flu, it just won't be as severe.
May 19, 2022
0
#3855
wsswan wrote:
The point I was making was the shots lowered my chance of croaking but did not make me immune.
They probably lowered your chances of getting though.
The fact that you rolled a six doesn't mean they didn't.
If the shots cause your immune system to kill the virus in your system before it can get started - how does that Not change the odds?
Misconception: to think that 'getting the disease' and 'not getting the disease' are digital A or B.
Its a matter of how much time it takes your immune system to kill the virus.
Even the common cold may not be knocked out right away.
If it didn't get to the point where you 'had cold symptoms' does that mean the cold virus didn't temporarily infect ?
Of Course Not.
There are all kinds of viruses out there.
Your immune system is fighting them constantly.
That's why AIDS was such a nasty disease - it meant you had no protection against any number of viruses. No immune system. Period.
Various kinds of viruses - once in your system - could multiply inside and keep doing so... until you are Dead.
May 19, 2022
0
#3856
The action of one's immune system - whether with vaccination or not -
is Scalar. Not digital A or B. Its a process. Not a toggle switch on a computer.
this discussion shows how some have little patience for those at the extremes.
it also sheds light on the anti-vaxxers. i have little patience for these folks, and it is based on what most know. it is possible that the anti-vaxxers have helped create the variants. anyone saying this is wrong needs to look at their shots from when they were kids. look at anti-vaxxers in the northwest and note the spread of measles.
i am amazed at how many "contribute" without a clue what experts in the field say.
May 20, 2022
0
#3858
I have several degrees in science and worked in science until I retired. Player is also educated from what read. We have a clue!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
"Official Data Indicates that Triple-Vaccinated People Are Developing Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome at an Alarming Rate
A thorough investigation of 5 months of official UK government data published by the UK Health Security Agency appears to confirm predictions made earlier by The Expose that the Covid-19 'booster' dose would kickstart very short-lived temporary to the immune system of the vaccinated population before decimating their immune system much faster than what had already been observed in people who received two doses of the Covid-19 vaccine.
In short, official UK government data strongly suggests that the population vaccinated against Covid-19 develops a new form of acquired immunodeficiency syndrome induced by the Covid-19 vaccine.
The UK Health Security Agency (UKHSA) publishes a weekly vaccine monitoring report, with each report containing four weeks of data on Covid-19 cases, hospitalizations and deaths, by vaccination status. For our investigation, we analyzed 5 of these published vaccine surveillance reports, containing data from August 16, 2021 to January 2, 2022, to get a clear picture of the effect of Covid-19 vaccines on the immune system of the vaccinated population, and here is what we found…
The UKHSA vaccine surveillance reports used for our investigation can be viewed here.
‘Covid-19 Vaccine Surveillance Report – Week 37’ (Published by PHE)
‘Covid-19 Vaccine Surveillance Report – Week 41’ (Published by UKHSA)
‘Covid-19 Vaccine Surveillance Report – Week 45’ (Published by UKHSA)
‘Covid-19 Vaccine Surveillance Report – Week 49’ (Published by UKHSA)
‘Covid-19 Vaccine Surveillance Report – Week 1 – 2022’ (Published by UKHSA)
Effectiveness of the Covid-19 vaccine in the real world
Pfizer claims its Covid-19 mRNA injection has a 95% vaccine efficacy. This claim is based on a simple calculation (full details of which can be viewed here) performed on the number of confirmed infections in the vaccinated group and the unvaccinated group during the early stages of clinical trials that are still ongoing.
Today, thanks to a wealth of data published by the UK Health Safety Agency, we are able to use the same calculation that was used to calculate the 95% effectiveness of the Pfizer vaccine, to calculate the effectiveness of Covid-19 vaccines, and the data unfortunately paints an extremely worrying picture.
The Week 37 Vaccine Surveillance Report includes the number of Covid-19 cases by vaccination status between week 33 and week 36 of 2021 (August 16 to September 12). As the report tells us the rates of Covid-19 cases per 100,000 people among the unvaccinated population and the two-dose vaccinated population, we are able to calculate the actual effectiveness of the vaccine during this period, and it turned out to be the following –
The real-world effectiveness of all available Covid-19 vaccines combined was as low as minus -47% in the 60-69 age group, and as high as +66% in the age group under 18 years old between August 16 and September 12, 2021. The only other age groups for whom the vaccine had a positive effect at this stage were 18-29, 30-39, and 80+. But as you can see, none of these age groups showed vaccine effectiveness close to 95%.
However, just look at how things turned around a month later.
The Week 41 vaccine monitoring report included the number of Covid-19 cases by vaccination status between week 37 and week 40 of 2021 (September 13 to October 10), and actual vaccine effectiveness during of this period turned out to be the following –
Source
Real-world effectiveness of all available Covid-19 vaccines combined was as low as minus -109% in the 40-49 age group, and as high as +89% in the age group under 18 between September 13 and October 10, 2021. The only other age group for which the vaccine had a positive effect at this stage was 18-29 year olds.
What is worrying is the drop in the real effectiveness of the vaccine in all age groups, but especially in the 40-49 age group, which went from a real effectiveness of minus 36% to less 109%.
The fact that the actual efficacy of the vaccines exceeded the minus 100% barrier suggests that the vaccines were not only failing, but also completely decimating the recipients' immune systems.
Reading the next vaccine surveillance report is therefore frightening.
The Week 45 vaccine monitoring report included the number of Covid-19 cases by vaccination status between week 41 and week 44 of 2021 (October 11 to November 7), and actual vaccine effectiveness during of this period turned out to be the following
Source
The actual effectiveness of all available Covid-19 vaccines combined was minus-126% in the 40-49 age group and +78% in the under-18 age group between October 11 and November 7, 2021. The only other age group for which the vaccine has had a positive effect at this point is 18-29 year olds.
Worryingly, two other age groups broke the minus 100% barrier, with 50-59 year olds dropping to minus 116% and 60-69 year olds dropping to minus 120%. But what is perhaps more worrying is that the effectiveness of Covid-19 injections has continued to decline in the 40-49 age group after already breaking the minus 100% barrier the month before.
What can also be seen is that the effectiveness of injecting Covid-19 in people over 80 has gone from minus 22% to minus 9%. This coincides with the launch of booster vaccination in this age group, suggesting that vaccines do indeed boost the immune system. It should be noted, however, that the efficacy remains negative in this age group and is still below the minus 3% efficacy seen between week 33 and week 36 of 2021.
The Week 49 Vaccine Surveillance Report, however, provides a much clearer picture of the effect of boosters on the vaccinated population in the short term.
The Week 49 Vaccine Monitoring Report includes the number of Covid-19 cases by vaccination status between week 45 and week 48 of 2021 (November 8 to December 5), and actual vaccine effectiveness during of this period turned out to be the following:
The real-world effectiveness of all available Covid-19 vaccines combined was minus 120% in the 40-49 age group and plus 80% in the under-18 age group between November 8 and November 5. December 2021. The actual effectiveness of Covid-19 injections actually only decreased among 18-29 year olds and 30-39 year olds during these four weeks.
People over the age of 70 were rewarded with a significant boost in their immune systems over these four weeks, with vaccine efficacy found to be +27% in 70-79 year olds between November 8 and December 5, 21, compared to minus-84% between October 11 and November 7, 21.
Vaccine efficacy in people over the age of 80 increased to +47% between 8 November and 5 December 21, compared to minus-9% between 11 October and 7 November 21.
People between the ages of 40 and 69 also benefited from a boost in their immune systems during this period, but not enough for the effectiveness of the vaccine to be positive. This improvement in vaccine effectiveness coincides with when boosters were given to each age group, as shown in the graph below, taken from the UKHSA Vaccine Monitoring Report – Week 1 – 2022 .
Considering that the efficacy of the vaccine turned positive in all people over the age of 70 after the booster injection, whereas it was previously negative, we should expect to see much better efficacy from the vaccine in people aged 40-69 years in the next published vaccine surveillance report.
But unfortunately, that is not the case.
The vaccine monitoring report for week 1 – 2022- included the number of Covid-19 cases by vaccination status between week 49 and week 52 of 2021 (from December 6 to January 2), and the actual effectiveness of the vaccine during this period turned out to be the following –
Between December 6 and January 2, the vaccine's effectiveness reached its lowest level to date in all age groups except those over 70, but the latter still have effectiveness. negative.
The expected increase in vaccine efficacy in 40-69 year olds did not materialize and a huge drop in vaccine efficacy was recorded, up to -151% in 40-49 year olds.
Vaccine effectiveness also dropped in the 30-39 age group, to minus 123%, despite the booster shot being given to millions in week 49.
The following graph illustrates the increase/decrease in vaccine effectiveness by month in each age group over a 5-month period from August 16, 21 to January 2, 22.
The first booster shots were given in week 37 of 2021, and this graph clearly illustrates how they boosted the effectiveness of the vaccine over the following two months. But unfortunately, it also shows that this improvement was short-lived, with the effectiveness of Covid-19 vaccines falling to frightening levels between weeks 49 and 52.
But what does a positive or negative efficacy of the vaccine actually mean?
Vaccines work by simulating a viral attack and causing the immune system to react as if you had been infected with the virus. They are supposed to train the immune system until you develop natural immunity against the virus. Therefore, the effectiveness of a vaccine is actually a measure of the performance of the immune system induced by the vaccine.
A vaccine efficacy of +50% would mean that fully vaccinated people are 50% more protected against Covid-19 than unvaccinated people. In other words, fully vaccinated people have a 50% better immune system to fight Covid-19.
A vaccine efficacy of -50% would mean that unvaccinated people are 50% more protected against Covid-19 than fully vaccinated people, which means that vaccines would decimate the immune system.
Therefore, with the true efficacy of Covid-19 vaccines proving negative in all people over the age of 18 in England, this means that the immune systems of doubly or triply vaccinated adults are decimated.
Immune system performance
The formula used to calculate the actual effectiveness of Covid-19 vaccines was based on the exact calculation used by Pfizer to verify that their vaccine had a supposed 95% effectiveness.
U = Number of cases among the unvaccinated
V = Number of cases among fully vaccinated people
U – V / U = Vaccine efficacy
However, in order to calculate immune system performance, we need to perform a slightly different calculation that divides the U–V response by the highest number of cases among the unvaccinated or fully vaccinated.
Therefore, the calculation for a positive performance of the immune system is –
U–V/U
While the calculation of a negative immune system performance is –
U–V/V
The following table shows the monthly boost/decline of the immune system of the vaccinated population compared to the natural immune system of the unvaccinated population-
This shows that as of January 2, 2021 (Month 5), triple/double vaccinated 40-49 year olds currently have the worst immune system performance at -60%. But they are closely followed by 30-39 year olds at -58%, 18-29 year olds and 50-59 year olds at -55%, and 60-69 year olds at -47%.
The following graph illustrates the overall immune system performance across all age groups in England over the past 5 months
What we can see from the above is that the immune system performance of adults aged 18-59 has deteriorated to the worst levels to date since receiving the Covid-19 vaccine. While the immune system performance of all people over 60 deteriorated significantly after receiving the booster, but not yet to the level seen between week 37 and week 40.
Those over 70, however, experienced the most dramatic decline in immune system performance between month 4 and month 5 alongside 18-29 year olds.
The 55% boost in the immune system of those over 80, obtained by the booster injections between month 3 and month 4, almost completely deteriorated between month 4 and month 5. Their immune system is 1% more efficient than at month 3, but remains 54% less efficient than that of non-vaccinated people.
The 73% boost in the immune system of 70-79 year olds, provided by booster shots between the third and fourth month, also deteriorated between the fourth and fifth month. Their immune system is 10% more efficient than in the third month, but remains 63% less efficient than that of unvaccinated people.
The slight boost given to the immune system of all people aged 30-59 by vaccines between months 3 and 4 was completely decimated the following month, while 18-29 year olds saw the performance of their system immune decrease by 60% between months 4 and 5.
The following graph illustrates the increase/decrease in immune system performance across all age groups in England over the past 5 months.
Acquired immunodeficiency syndrome induced by the Covid-19 vaccine
The actual effectiveness of Covid-19 injections declines dramatically over a short period of time, but unfortunately for the vaccinated population, instead of the immune system returning to the same state as before vaccination, immune system performance begins to decline rapidly, making it lower than that of unvaccinated people.
Official data from the UK government proves that a booster dose of the vaccine can boost the immune system of vaccinated people in the short term, but unfortunately these same data show that the performance of the immune system then starts to decline even more rapidly than before. administration of the booster dose.
These data therefore suggest that the vaccinated population will now need an endless cycle of boosters to boost their immune system until it is no longer failing but lower than that of the unvaccinated population.
Acquired immunodeficiency syndrome is a disease that causes the loss of immune cells and makes individuals vulnerable to other infections and the development of certain types of cancers. In other words, it completely decimates the immune system.
Therefore, could we be witnessing a new form of acquired immunodeficiency syndrome induced by the Covid-19 vaccine?
Only time will tell, but judging by the current numbers, it looks like we only have to wait a few weeks to find out.
source: https://dailyexpose.uk
via https://resistance-mondiale.com
Source: international network
chamo2074 wrote:
"Official Data Indicates that Triple-Vaccinated People Are Developing Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome at an Alarming Rate
A thorough investigation of 5 months of official UK government data published by the UK Health Security Agency appears to confirm predictions made earlier by The Expose that the Covid-19 'booster' dose would kickstart very short-lived temporary to the immune system of the vaccinated population before decimating their immune system much faster than what had already been observed in people who received two doses of the Covid-19 vaccine.
In short, official UK government data strongly suggests that the population vaccinated against Covid-19 develops a new form of acquired immunodeficiency syndrome induced by the Covid-19 vaccine.
The UK Health Security Agency (UKHSA) publishes a weekly vaccine monitoring report, with each report containing four weeks of data on Covid-19 cases, hospitalizations and deaths, by vaccination status. For our investigation, we analyzed 5 of these published vaccine surveillance reports, containing data from August 16, 2021 to January 2, 2022, to get a clear picture of the effect of Covid-19 vaccines on the immune system of the vaccinated population, and here is what we found…
The UKHSA vaccine surveillance reports used for our investigation can be viewed here.
‘Covid-19 Vaccine Surveillance Report – Week 37’ (Published by PHE)
‘Covid-19 Vaccine Surveillance Report – Week 41’ (Published by UKHSA)
‘Covid-19 Vaccine Surveillance Report – Week 45’ (Published by UKHSA)
‘Covid-19 Vaccine Surveillance Report – Week 49’ (Published by UKHSA)
‘Covid-19 Vaccine Surveillance Report – Week 1 – 2022’ (Published by UKHSA)
Effectiveness of the Covid-19 vaccine in the real world
Pfizer claims its Covid-19 mRNA injection has a 95% vaccine efficacy. This claim is based on a simple calculation (full details of which can be viewed here) performed on the number of confirmed infections in the vaccinated group and the unvaccinated group during the early stages of clinical trials that are still ongoing.
Today, thanks to a wealth of data published by the UK Health Safety Agency, we are able to use the same calculation that was used to calculate the 95% effectiveness of the Pfizer vaccine, to calculate the effectiveness of Covid-19 vaccines, and the data unfortunately paints an extremely worrying picture.
The Week 37 Vaccine Surveillance Report includes the number of Covid-19 cases by vaccination status between week 33 and week 36 of 2021 (August 16 to September 12). As the report tells us the rates of Covid-19 cases per 100,000 people among the unvaccinated population and the two-dose vaccinated population, we are able to calculate the actual effectiveness of the vaccine during this period, and it turned out to be the following –
The real-world effectiveness of all available Covid-19 vaccines combined was as low as minus -47% in the 60-69 age group, and as high as +66% in the age group under 18 years old between August 16 and September 12, 2021. The only other age groups for whom the vaccine had a positive effect at this stage were 18-29, 30-39, and 80+. But as you can see, none of these age groups showed vaccine effectiveness close to 95%.
However, just look at how things turned around a month later.
The Week 41 vaccine monitoring report included the number of Covid-19 cases by vaccination status between week 37 and week 40 of 2021 (September 13 to October 10), and actual vaccine effectiveness during of this period turned out to be the following –
Source
Real-world effectiveness of all available Covid-19 vaccines combined was as low as minus -109% in the 40-49 age group, and as high as +89% in the age group under 18 between September 13 and October 10, 2021. The only other age group for which the vaccine had a positive effect at this stage was 18-29 year olds.
What is worrying is the drop in the real effectiveness of the vaccine in all age groups, but especially in the 40-49 age group, which went from a real effectiveness of minus 36% to less 109%.
The fact that the actual efficacy of the vaccines exceeded the minus 100% barrier suggests that the vaccines were not only failing, but also completely decimating the recipients' immune systems.
Reading the next vaccine surveillance report is therefore frightening.
The Week 45 vaccine monitoring report included the number of Covid-19 cases by vaccination status between week 41 and week 44 of 2021 (October 11 to November 7), and actual vaccine effectiveness during of this period turned out to be the following
Source
The actual effectiveness of all available Covid-19 vaccines combined was minus-126% in the 40-49 age group and +78% in the under-18 age group between October 11 and November 7, 2021. The only other age group for which the vaccine has had a positive effect at this point is 18-29 year olds.
Worryingly, two other age groups broke the minus 100% barrier, with 50-59 year olds dropping to minus 116% and 60-69 year olds dropping to minus 120%. But what is perhaps more worrying is that the effectiveness of Covid-19 injections has continued to decline in the 40-49 age group after already breaking the minus 100% barrier the month before.
What can also be seen is that the effectiveness of injecting Covid-19 in people over 80 has gone from minus 22% to minus 9%. This coincides with the launch of booster vaccination in this age group, suggesting that vaccines do indeed boost the immune system. It should be noted, however, that the efficacy remains negative in this age group and is still below the minus 3% efficacy seen between week 33 and week 36 of 2021.
The Week 49 Vaccine Surveillance Report, however, provides a much clearer picture of the effect of boosters on the vaccinated population in the short term.
The Week 49 Vaccine Monitoring Report includes the number of Covid-19 cases by vaccination status between week 45 and week 48 of 2021 (November 8 to December 5), and actual vaccine effectiveness during of this period turned out to be the following:
The real-world effectiveness of all available Covid-19 vaccines combined was minus 120% in the 40-49 age group and plus 80% in the under-18 age group between November 8 and November 5. December 2021. The actual effectiveness of Covid-19 injections actually only decreased among 18-29 year olds and 30-39 year olds during these four weeks.
People over the age of 70 were rewarded with a significant boost in their immune systems over these four weeks, with vaccine efficacy found to be +27% in 70-79 year olds between November 8 and December 5, 21, compared to minus-84% between October 11 and November 7, 21.
Vaccine efficacy in people over the age of 80 increased to +47% between 8 November and 5 December 21, compared to minus-9% between 11 October and 7 November 21.
People between the ages of 40 and 69 also benefited from a boost in their immune systems during this period, but not enough for the effectiveness of the vaccine to be positive. This improvement in vaccine effectiveness coincides with when boosters were given to each age group, as shown in the graph below, taken from the UKHSA Vaccine Monitoring Report – Week 1 – 2022 .
Considering that the efficacy of the vaccine turned positive in all people over the age of 70 after the booster injection, whereas it was previously negative, we should expect to see much better efficacy from the vaccine in people aged 40-69 years in the next published vaccine surveillance report.
But unfortunately, that is not the case.
The vaccine monitoring report for week 1 – 2022- included the number of Covid-19 cases by vaccination status between week 49 and week 52 of 2021 (from December 6 to January 2), and the actual effectiveness of the vaccine during this period turned out to be the following –
Between December 6 and January 2, the vaccine's effectiveness reached its lowest level to date in all age groups except those over 70, but the latter still have effectiveness. negative.
The expected increase in vaccine efficacy in 40-69 year olds did not materialize and a huge drop in vaccine efficacy was recorded, up to -151% in 40-49 year olds.
Vaccine effectiveness also dropped in the 30-39 age group, to minus 123%, despite the booster shot being given to millions in week 49.
The following graph illustrates the increase/decrease in vaccine effectiveness by month in each age group over a 5-month period from August 16, 21 to January 2, 22.
The first booster shots were given in week 37 of 2021, and this graph clearly illustrates how they boosted the effectiveness of the vaccine over the following two months. But unfortunately, it also shows that this improvement was short-lived, with the effectiveness of Covid-19 vaccines falling to frightening levels between weeks 49 and 52.
But what does a positive or negative efficacy of the vaccine actually mean?
Vaccines work by simulating a viral attack and causing the immune system to react as if you had been infected with the virus. They are supposed to train the immune system until you develop natural immunity against the virus. Therefore, the effectiveness of a vaccine is actually a measure of the performance of the immune system induced by the vaccine.
A vaccine efficacy of +50% would mean that fully vaccinated people are 50% more protected against Covid-19 than unvaccinated people. In other words, fully vaccinated people have a 50% better immune system to fight Covid-19.
A vaccine efficacy of -50% would mean that unvaccinated people are 50% more protected against Covid-19 than fully vaccinated people, which means that vaccines would decimate the immune system.
Therefore, with the true efficacy of Covid-19 vaccines proving negative in all people over the age of 18 in England, this means that the immune systems of doubly or triply vaccinated adults are decimated.
Immune system performance
The formula used to calculate the actual effectiveness of Covid-19 vaccines was based on the exact calculation used by Pfizer to verify that their vaccine had a supposed 95% effectiveness.
U = Number of cases among the unvaccinated
V = Number of cases among fully vaccinated people
U – V / U = Vaccine efficacy
However, in order to calculate immune system performance, we need to perform a slightly different calculation that divides the U–V response by the highest number of cases among the unvaccinated or fully vaccinated.
Therefore, the calculation for a positive performance of the immune system is –
U–V/U
While the calculation of a negative immune system performance is –
U–V/V
The following table shows the monthly boost/decline of the immune system of the vaccinated population compared to the natural immune system of the unvaccinated population-
This shows that as of January 2, 2021 (Month 5), triple/double vaccinated 40-49 year olds currently have the worst immune system performance at -60%. But they are closely followed by 30-39 year olds at -58%, 18-29 year olds and 50-59 year olds at -55%, and 60-69 year olds at -47%.
The following graph illustrates the overall immune system performance across all age groups in England over the past 5 months
What we can see from the above is that the immune system performance of adults aged 18-59 has deteriorated to the worst levels to date since receiving the Covid-19 vaccine. While the immune system performance of all people over 60 deteriorated significantly after receiving the booster, but not yet to the level seen between week 37 and week 40.
Those over 70, however, experienced the most dramatic decline in immune system performance between month 4 and month 5 alongside 18-29 year olds.
The 55% boost in the immune system of those over 80, obtained by the booster injections between month 3 and month 4, almost completely deteriorated between month 4 and month 5. Their immune system is 1% more efficient than at month 3, but remains 54% less efficient than that of non-vaccinated people.
The 73% boost in the immune system of 70-79 year olds, provided by booster shots between the third and fourth month, also deteriorated between the fourth and fifth month. Their immune system is 10% more efficient than in the third month, but remains 63% less efficient than that of unvaccinated people.
The slight boost given to the immune system of all people aged 30-59 by vaccines between months 3 and 4 was completely decimated the following month, while 18-29 year olds saw the performance of their system immune decrease by 60% between months 4 and 5.
The following graph illustrates the increase/decrease in immune system performance across all age groups in England over the past 5 months.
Acquired immunodeficiency syndrome induced by the Covid-19 vaccine
The actual effectiveness of Covid-19 injections declines dramatically over a short period of time, but unfortunately for the vaccinated population, instead of the immune system returning to the same state as before vaccination, immune system performance begins to decline rapidly, making it lower than that of unvaccinated people.
Official data from the UK government proves that a booster dose of the vaccine can boost the immune system of vaccinated people in the short term, but unfortunately these same data show that the performance of the immune system then starts to decline even more rapidly than before. administration of the booster dose.
These data therefore suggest that the vaccinated population will now need an endless cycle of boosters to boost their immune system until it is no longer failing but lower than that of the unvaccinated population.
Acquired immunodeficiency syndrome is a disease that causes the loss of immune cells and makes individuals vulnerable to other infections and the development of certain types of cancers. In other words, it completely decimates the immune system.
Therefore, could we be witnessing a new form of acquired immunodeficiency syndrome induced by the Covid-19 vaccine?
Only time will tell, but judging by the current numbers, it looks like we only have to wait a few weeks to find out.
source: https://dailyexpose.uk
via https://resistance-mondiale.com
Source: international network
Your sources are both anti-vax sites.
In a few short weeks we'll know the answer, according to you. When those few weeks have gone by, assuming the world is not in panic and chaos over everyone's loss of their entire immune systems, you will hopefully refrain from doing this again. I'll address that more in a month from now.
This statement:
"A thorough investigation of 5 months of official UK government data published by the UK Health Security Agency appears to confirm predictions made earlier by The Expose that the Covid-19 'booster' dose would kickstart very short-lived temporary to the immune system of the vaccinated population before decimating their immune system much faster than what had already been observed in people who received two doses of the Covid-19 vaccine.
In short, official UK government data strongly suggests that the population vaccinated against Covid-19 develops a new form of acquired immunodeficiency syndrome induced by the Covid-19 vaccine."
...is misleading. What occurred does not in any way appear to be a "thorough investigation", it is a remote viewing of high-level published data/results and a faulty interpretation of it by an anti-vax website looking for a reasonable avenue of attack. Saying "in short, UK government data" etc. is intentionally, willfully misleading. The UK government does not endorse this position currently, at all.
"Power BI is an interactive data visualization software product developed by Microsoft with primary focus on business intelligence. It is part of the Microsoft Power Platform."
It utilizes data from drees which is extremely reliable from May 2021 so it does not only take omicron-related statistics into consideration.
Omicron is the current variant, and only new variants coming are considered omicron sub-variants. They're getting more transmissible but also much less deadly. If the vaccine used to be efficient, the truth is that it's not that efficient anymore with the omicron variant. Why exactly should we never have reached omicron? Was the virus supposed to get eradicated with better gesture? Maybe questioning the gesture of the pandemic is reasonable.
"Boosters specifically targeting Omicron are not due until August or after...so this is fairly misleading"
Well, at the same time, people are jobless because they didn't inject a vaccine that's experimental and non-specific to the current wave. In France they're considering implementing 'placement' which allows the authorities to move unvaccinated people from their houses. The atrocities we're seeing is insane. If COVID caused damage, this is causing as much damage. 5M deaths? I wonder how many people are going to find themselves jobless because they refused a vaccine to protect people from a virus that currently has a 0.1% fatality rate (last 28 days according to John Hopkins, probably even less because of under-reported asymptomatic cases) and that is not doing a good job at all at preventing transmission.
I would not be in favor of "placement" measures ala leper colonies, either. That's an unethical road to take.
I used to manage a business intelligence team, so I was more concerned about the content than the platform itself. If this data is taken from Drees, is it available online directly from Drees? Etc.