Covid-19 Discussion (moderated)

Sort:
DiogenesDue
UnclePeet wrote:

The infection rate of a virus with a 99.8% survivability for anyone under 50 is meaningless 

Clearly not, unless you just don't care at all about 230K+ people being dead.  Perhaps the notion that infected people infect other people in turn has escaped you.

UnclePeet
btickler wrote:
UnclePeet wrote:

The infection rate of a virus with a 99.8% survivability for anyone under 50 is meaningless 

Clearly not, unless you just don't care at all about 230K+ people being dead.  Perhaps the notion that infected people infect other people in turn has escaped you.

If you are at risk then YOU quarantine.  YOU take measures to protect yourself.

Dont shut down the entire economy because a tiny % of the population POSSIBLY could die from this.

Chuck Grassley, old as dirt, has it and he’s fine.

America is an unhealthy country.  Obesity, drug use, diabetes and god knows what else.

If certain people were allergic to the sun we wouldn’t blanket the atmosphere to block it out for those people.  Those people that were at risk would be expected to take precautions.

Ive been working since day 1 in New York surrounded by it.  I saw 10,000 gather shoulder to shoulder to protest one form of idiocy after another and nobody said a word....so obviously people aren’t too concerned.

UnclePeet
llama45 wrote:

Some of those who survive suffer life long effects.

 

"However, new research is now suggesting that there may be long-term neurologic consequences in those who survive COVID infections, including more than seven million Americans and another 27 million people worldwide. "

 

 

https://www.health.harvard.edu/blog/the-hidden-long-term-cognitive-effects-of-covid-2020100821133

 

“Research suggesting” means nothing 

UnclePeet
llama45 wrote:

News articles tend to be like that.

By the way, your last few links have been exactly that: research and news articles.

Not really no.

Using confirmed cases and deaths to come up with a mortality rate is not the same as predicting that, in the future, things MIGHT happen based on certain things happening now.

UnclePeet

llama45 wrote:
UnclePeet wrote:
btickler wrote:
UnclePeet wrote:

The infection rate of a virus with a 99.8% survivability for anyone under 50 is meaningless 

Clearly not, unless you just don't care at all about 230K+ people being dead.  Perhaps the notion that infected people infect other people in turn has escaped you.

If you are at risk then YOU quarantine.  YOU take measures to protect yourself.

Dont shut down the entire economy because a tiny % of the population POSSIBLY could die from this.

Chuck Grassley, old as dirt, has it and he’s fine.

America is an unhealthy country.  Obesity, drug use, diabetes and god knows what else.

If certain people were allergic to the sun we wouldn’t blanket the atmosphere to block it out for those people.  Those people that were at risk would be expected to take precautions.

Ive been working since day 1 in New York surrounded by it.  I saw 10,000 gather shoulder to shoulder to protest one form of idiocy after another and nobody said a word....so obviously people aren’t too concerned.

Mandating mask wearing is not shutting down the economy.

Testing for anyone who needs it is not shutting down the economy.

Pretending COVID is a hoax and suggesting non-cures is not leadership.

Maybe that’s why masks weren’t originally mandated 

The same reason why the president was called a xenophobe for wanting to close the border during a pandemic.

Certain people weren’t thinking clearly.

David
UnclePeet wrote:

Dont shut down the entire economy because a tiny % of the population POSSIBLY could die from this.

No-one's arguing for shutting down the ENTIRE economy: it's targeted lockdowns in hotspots. Unfortunately, if you let your entire country become a hotspot, then yeah, I guess shutting down your entire country might become necessary.

A "tiny %" is not "POSSIBLY" going to die: a % WILL die. Whether that % is "tiny" or not is one of the discussion points, but clearly you don't think it's worth trying to protect them: that's the same lack of empathy and concern for others that's come from the current leadership, and why it's gotten as bad as it has.

DiogenesDue
UnclePeet wrote:

If you are at risk then YOU quarantine.  YOU take measures to protect yourself.

Dont shut down the entire economy because a tiny % of the population POSSIBLY could die from this.

Chuck Grassley, old as dirt, has it and he’s fine.

America is an unhealthy country.  Obesity, drug use, diabetes and god knows what else.

If certain people were allergic to the sun we wouldn’t blanket the atmosphere to block it out for those people.  Those people that were at risk would be expected to take precautions.

Ive been working since day 1 in New York surrounded by it.  I saw 10,000 gather shoulder to shoulder to protest one form of idiocy after another and nobody said a word....so obviously people aren’t too concerned.

You said infection rate is meaningless.  That is *obviously* incorrect.  Everything else you posted is what-about-ism and strawmanning.  Nobody posited anything you were just railing against.

That being said, I am sure that during the bubonic plague, as the carts were wheeling away the piles of the dead, there were people just like you saying "not my problem, business as usual".

Strangemover
Strangemover wrote:

UK chancellor has been speaking today... estimated cost for Coronavirus measures this year is £280 billion + an estimated £73 billion next year. The summary of his speech is we are f***ed for the next 4 years or so, unemployment will rise, taxes will rise etc. Good times. 

Just requoting what I posted an hour or so ago before this conversation got US-centric. The economy is knackered here in UK. It will take years to recover. 

UnclePeet

Nobody is going to follow a mask mandate get real.  You can’t even stop these people from gathering in the thousands to rob the local liquor store or burn down the Walgreens....

UnclePeet

Keep schools open, keep businesses open, quarantine the vulnerable 

DiogenesDue
Strangemover wrote:
Strangemover wrote:

UK chancellor has been speaking today... estimated cost for Coronavirus measures this year is £280 billion + an estimated £73 billion next year. The summary of his speech is we are f***ed for the next 4 years or so, unemployment will rise, taxes will rise etc. Good times. 

Just requoting what I posted an hour or so ago before this conversation got US-centric. The economy is knackered here in UK. It will take years to recover. 

Money is an abstraction.  A construct.  If the world ceased to accept money tomorrow, people would still have to go on, and they would.  If the whole world suffers an economic downturn, then in relative terms, it's not as bad as you are making out.  Thus the DOW breaking 30,000.  Relative.

David
UnclePeet wrote:

Keep schools open, keep businesses open, quarantine the vulnerable 

Fill up your hospital capacity and increase the mortality rate because of that - yeah!

UnclePeet
llama45 wrote:

You're right, some armed protesters were so determined to not take care of themselves or their community by wearing masks that they shut down city hall. (Of course protesting mask wearing is much more noble than protesting human death, and property damage is much worse than actual murder i.e. Kyle Rittenhouse).

But for all the government's failings, at least they can stop anti American plots, such as the kidnapping of governors.

Oh my GOODNESS! Someone SHUT DOWN CITY HALL!  LETS ALL RUN AND HIDE!

I mean certainly that’s worse than the BILLIONS in damage from spoiled rotten leftists running AMOK right?

I mean one group STOOD AROUND and SCARED people who are so weak it makes my stomach turn.

The other groups murdered police, burned buildings and assaulted citizens and will now cost the taxpayer BILLIONS in the damages they caused.

Yeah that sure sounds equal.

 

DiogenesDue
UnclePeet wrote:

Nobody is going to follow a mask mandate get real.  You can’t even stop these people from gathering in the thousands to rob the local liquor store or burn down the Walgreens....

Those are not the people that will not follow a mask mandate.  As you well know.  It's the Braveheart "you'll never take my freedom" schmucks that will ignore it.  Even moreso now that they "lost" and need to save face in their eyes.

UnclePeet
Caedrel wrote:
UnclePeet wrote:

Keep schools open, keep businesses open, quarantine the vulnerable 

Fill up your hospital capacity and increase the mortality rate because of that - yeah!

Well the head of the CDC says that schools are the safest place for kids to be and doctor Fauci also wants schools open.

Listen to the experts right?

AdeptToaster
People are dying and that’s
Not good. How can I make my hause safer
UnclePeet
btickler wrote:
UnclePeet wrote:

Nobody is going to follow a mask mandate get real.  You can’t even stop these people from gathering in the thousands to rob the local liquor store or burn down the Walgreens....

Those are not the people that will not follow a mask mandate.  As you well know.  It's the Braveheart "you'll never take my freedom" schmucks that will ignore it.  Even moreso now that they "lost" and need to save face in their eyes.

And you know they will not follow the mask mandate HOW?  Is this more of your rock solid data?  Are you a psychic?

Surely someone who burns and loots the local drug store because the cops shot some random violent drug addict is a clear thinking person...certainly the type to follow rules and such....

DiogenesDue
UnclePeet wrote:

Oh my GOODNESS! Someone SHUT DOWN CITY HALL!  LETS ALL RUN AND HIDE!

I mean certainly that’s worse than the BILLIONS in damage from spoiled rotten leftists running AMOK right?

I mean one group STOOD AROUND and SCARED people who are so weak it makes my stomach turn.

The other groups murdered police, burned buildings and assaulted citizens and will now cost the taxpayer BILLIONS in the damages they caused.

Yeah that sure sounds equal.

Keep it outbreak-related.  So far, so good, but if you stray off into the weeds on the "evil of leftists", then that'll be the end of this particular set of exchanges.

David
UnclePeet wrote:
Caedrel wrote:
UnclePeet wrote:

Keep schools open, keep businesses open, quarantine the vulnerable 

Fill up your hospital capacity and increase the mortality rate because of that - yeah!

Well the head of the CDC says that schools are the safest place for kids to be and doctor Fauci also wants schools open.

Listen to the experts right?

It's what we did here in Australia - kept the schools open as long as possible and only moving to virtual learning when really strict lockdowns were required. Essential businesses stayed open, like grocery stores, but most had a scale of restrictions such as take away only for restaurants, closing of gyms and pubs, that sort thing. Sorry, you can't protect your economy without protecting the people who are dying from this.

And listening to the experts is exactly what this administration is NOT doing.

UnclePeet
llama45 wrote:

Can you imagine what a whiny little brat you'd have to be to show up to city hall with an assault rifle because someone asked you to wear a mask?

Meanwhile you vilify people protesting the loss of human life?

And as for destruction, property is valued more than life? That Kyle kid killed people.

Shows you how the typical conservative thinks.

The Kyle kid is out thanks to ME...I donated to him.

He killed a child molester and a couple of other criminals who ran up on him and tried to use violence...the lefts forte.

Standing while holding a gun, in a place where it is legal to open carry, shouldn’t even make you blink.  You don’t like it change the law.  It’s pretty simple.

God bless Kyle Rittenhouse.

 

This forum topic has been locked