Does True Randomness Actually Exist?

Sort:
DiogenesDue
noodles2112 wrote:

Sorry btickler.  Just the facts 

You don't know any facts that did not occur in your own line of sight, apparently wink.png.

Wits-end
btickler wrote:
noodles2112 wrote:

So how do you know this is what the earth is all the way to the core when the deepest hole ever dug is only around 8 miles? 

Why do you post here?  How do you know any of us exist?  How do you know anything beyond your trailerpark is real?  Same premise.

Woah, woah, woah now. Just a minute mister, no need to be hurling fireballs of insult here. The is nothing wrong with trailer parks. 😉

DiogenesDue
Wits-end wrote:

Woah, woah, woah now. Just a minute mister, no need to be hurling fireballs of insult here. The is nothing wrong with trailer parks. 😉

I didn't actually make any qualitative assessment of trailer parks...

Milesisnoob2323

Did you know that in big Nate lives it up page 159 Nate accuses miss nancy of having wicked B.O.

noodles2112

btickler - what do you mean by "insults"... Is a fact considered an insult where you come from and only fantasies/fictions allowedwink.png ?

DiogenesDue
noodles2112 wrote:

btickler - what do you mean by "insults"... Is a fact considered an insult where you come from and only fantasies/fictions allowed ?

I didn't make any statements about insults either.  So quoting the word is misleading since it never left my fingertips...

jpb09

e

Elroch
noodles2112 wrote:

Elroch - so what about gravity? It is indeed "fickle".

Holds trillions of gallons of water to the ball earth yet allows numerous things to escape its grasp balloons, smoke, lint etc. 

Is not gravity everywhere? If so, why can't they duplicate the ball earth with water holding to it in a laboratory? 

I would have thought the reason this is not trivial should be obvious. There is a large gravitational force towards the centre of the Earth, and you would need to emulate that force towards the centre of the basketball, from all directions.

There are two points in the sky which seem fixed to ALL observers - The North Pole of the sky (near Polaris) and the South Pole of the sky.

The map of the sky - pieced together from all views of it - is unquestionably SPHERICAL IN TOPOLOGY. The set of points in the sky that occur directly above any given location form a circle around one of the poles, depending only on the LATITUDE of the observer.

Flat Earthers have no way to deal with these unambiguous and crucial facts, but are protected by having inadequate intelligence to understand them and/or pathological psychology to ignore them.

[noodles - do you understand the fact that, due to its topology, it is IMPOSSIBLE to project the entire map of the night sky (the constellations visible from both hemispheres of the Earth onto a flat map? Likewise you can't with any amount of stretching turn a deflated balloon onto a single layer on a flat table without breaking it.

DiogenesDue
Elroch wrote:

I would have thought the reason this is not trivial should be obvious. There is a large gravitational force towards the centre of the Earth, and you would need to emulate that force towards the centre of the basketball, from all directions.

There are two points in the sky which seem fixed to ALL observers - The North Pole of the sky (near Polaris) and the South Pole of the sky.

The map of the sky - pieced together from all views of it - is unquestionably SPHERICAL IN TOPOLOGY. The set of points in the sky that occur directly above any given location form a circle around one of the poles, depending only on the LATITUDE of the observer.

Flat Earthers have no way to deal with these unambiguous and crucial facts, but are protected by having inadequate intelligence to understand them and/or pathological psychology to ignore them.

[noodles - do you understand the fact that, due to its topology, it is IMPOSSIBLE to project the entire map of the night sky (the constellations visible from both hemispheres of the Earth onto a flat map? Likewise you can't with any amount of stretching turn a deflated balloon onto a single layer on a flat table without breaking it.

Clearly not, we live on a mercator world, you see.  People are *really* big in the north and south, and tiny in the middle (proof, vikings vs. pygmies).  The universe likewise, the night sky is laid out the same way.  The Powers That Be (driven by the Ancient Ones) that are hiding this from us have created the Northern Lights and the Ozone Hole over the south pole to obscure/deter our viewing of things.  It all makes sense when you just plug it in...

Elroch

It is interesting to what extent Flat Earthers:

  1. are ignorant of the fact that the Southern sky rotates around the South Pole of the sky
  2. are incapable of understanding the significance
    and/or
  3. subconsciously or consciously ignore these crucial facts

so they can retain categorically incorrect beliefs.

noodles2112

Elroch - what map are you referring to as there are many maps and the constellations were mapped out long before heliocentric theory came along which usurped science replacing it with pseudoscience. 

There was no need to Imagine a rotating moon or a colossal sun 10's of millions of miles away.

More to the present point, there is a need for NASA and their CGI/Cartoon Animations to further propagate the ball earth.... Lost in Space! For it they didn't, heliocentrism would most likely be history or certainly challenged more intensely! However, more and more people worldwide are realizing that NASA is a complete charade organization. Where will that lead is anyone's guess. Supposedly NASA said they will retire the ISS in a few years much like they retired the shuttle program. You can always depend on NASA for space soap opera cliffhangers. That narrative began with Apollo 13! "Houston We Have A Problem"...NASA has bigger problems today and they don't take place in spacewink.png 

 

noodles2112

Optimissed - kind of like the JWT that can look back and see where it all beganwink.png

shadowhb123
So what’s the best cookie flavor though.
noodles2112

Cookies-n-cream ice creamhappy.png

shadowhb123
So we got one Oreo ice cream. Nice choice.
I like a classic chocolate chip too
noodles2112

Optimissed - what do you mean "simulate gravity"?

Not simulate it but use it. If they know exactly what the earth is made of then why can't they reproduce the theory of heliocentrism? Create the earth in a miniature form with all the equations worked out so that it would be a facsimile(exact replica) of the earth and then prove it. 

 

noodles2112

If it has already been done then why are "they" keeping it a secret? 

Oh, it has to be massive. How massive does a spherical object need to be in order for water to stick to it?

And the answer is........as big as the earthwink.png

DiogenesDue
noodles2112 wrote:

If it has already been done then why are "they" keeping it a secret? 

Oh, it has to be massive. How massive does a spherical object need to be in order for water to stick to it?

And the answer is........as big as the earth

Oceans of mercury will stick to a large enough planet.

noodles2112

Oceans of mercury????!!!. Where do they get that from, oh yeah, the planet Mercurywink.png 

uranium comes from Uranus and plutonium comes from Plutohappy.png

noodles2112

Where can one locate this experiment? It will put the flat earth movement to rest once and for all!