Does True Randomness Actually Exist? ( ^&*#^%$&#% )

Sort:
2bz

https://youtu.be/31nl1bvUbxI

Elroch

It's a bit random.

Thee_Ghostess_Lola
Elroch wrote:
Optimissed wrote:

Is beauty relative?

Or is relativity beautiful?

i hope u git bed bugs

TheBestBeer_Root
Elroch wrote:

It's a bit random.

Lmao yeah fits well😂

 

True Randomness Actually Exists

Thee_Ghostess_Lola
..and btw, im white and u cant win me.

 

TheBestBeer_Root

Lol no one could play you with a board like that

MustangMate

Seems to be the point 🛎

MustangMate

Just thought of a thesis for the psych student- “Understanding the Beliefs in Randomness “.

KingAxelson

Sillver1

“Understanding the Beliefs in Randomness “ lol. that should pinch a nerve or two..

Sillver1

"Time to unravel this mystery of true randomness." not so sure about this one. maybe start with matterialism? ..because thats where TR lives

MustangMate

I think a belief that true randomness exists begins with our core beliefs. Some may try to convince us otherwise. They’ll claim (as example) that After observing the behavior of radio active decay- the conclusion is made- it exists.

But not the case. 1st is the core belief that TR exists and Then is it concluded the behavior is random.

For many this has its roots in beliefs of creation. Things become interpreted as determined or not. A misleading and dead end approach. But for many others not so invested the question of TR perhaps has its roots in the ways our minds work.

Seemingly random thoughts enter our minds at random times. We make best effort to be in control- to direct and focus our thoughts. But what of that tune that pops into mind or that memory of 20 years past? Perhaps the universe behaves similarly? 
If TR exists- it’s not for any of the reasons thus far given. 

Elroch
Thee_Ghostess_Lola wrote:
..and btw, im white and u cant win me.

I bet I could take all your pieces and that would count as a stalemate!

MustangMate

It’s about time for the OP to block these trolls who do nothing but post video links and talk trash. 

Guaranteed to elicit more of same.

Thee_Ghostess_Lola

but u cant w i n me. think elrock think !

Sillver1

"I think a belief that true randomness exists begins with our core beliefs. Some may try to convince us otherwise. They’ll claim (as example) that After observing the behavior of radio active decay- the conclusion is made- it exists.

But not the case. 1st is the core belief that TR exists and Then is it concluded the behavior is random.

For many this has its roots in beliefs of creation."

not sure how you link TR with creation. i think that it was rooted from misunderstanding of QM behavior. it all goes back to Copenhagen

MustangMate

The link is TR becomes the default explanation once the core belief is made- that creation was not of the deity variety. Hence, it becomes necessary to believe ideas of randomness.  

I should have written - for their lack of beliefs of creation ⚖️

Sillver1

got you. 'randomness is the deity of all gaps'  ..for the matterialstic doctrine it is

Sillver1

"for their lack of beliefs of creation" with this i disagree : ) it doesnt have to be an either/or Q.

Elroch
Thee_Ghostess_Lola wrote:

but u cant w i n me. think elrock think !

I thought and I agreed that if you play according to the rules of chess except without a king then you cannot, logically speaking, lose.