Does True Randomness Actually Exist? ( ^&*#^%$&#% )


Above is the math. The uncertainty principle explained.
I fail to see random variables represented, not being the matician

Hint to certain participants - your lack of comprehension is not in itself informative about a subject.

According to the Bayesian interpretation of probability, uncertainty and randomness are just two names for the same thing.
Then again, perhaps understood all too well 🤠

Hint to certain participants - your lack of comprehension is not in itself informative about a subject.
Same goes for your views about politics. Just sayin..

According to the Bayesian interpretation of probability, uncertainty and randomness are just two names for the same thing.
That is indeed a reasonable statement.
Then again, perhaps understood all too well 🤠

randomness is a measure of uncertainty of an outcome,
Again, perfectly reasonable.
rather than its haphazardness
An informal term, best avoided. It has no clear meaning separate from other notions of randomness.

The 1 thing book, if I can find an audio copy I just might. There great for those long trips I take all the time. My '1thing' is probably being an outlier.
A long over due toast, to your continued good health!..

you can download it from audiable. it help in those areas with no reception : ) and thx for the shot.. my health is fine, its something else, dont worry about it, cheers

king, i think youll like this book.. its written by gary keller, the owner of keller williams
If I had 10 cents for every book that promised to make me a millionaire...
Just kidding - looks a nice book.

gary keller has more than 100,000 independent people working under his brand name KW, and his one thing is to keep them educated and motivated. i think hes good at it because they generate sales of over $250B's yearly.

but somthin just crossed my mind.. you made hundreds of posts on this topic, and not even a single one of them is about True Randomness. kinda odd wont you say? maybe its the right time..

I challenge anyone to predict Ghostess' next post. If it proves utterly impossible, we have the answer to the title question.

but somthin just crossed my mind.. you made hundreds of posts on this topic, and not even a single one of them is about True Randomness.
It is your failing, not mine, to have forgotten the ones discussing what would be a definition of "true randomness", arriving at a definition and then reasoning that definition is satisfied by certain phenomena, based on key, empirically verified physics.
kinda odd wont you say? maybe its the right time.
No, that time is way back in this discussion.