Does True Randomness Actually Exist? ( ^&*#^%$&#% )

What are you talking about? The Monty Hall problem? 

If so. Yeah, it's pretty simple. All though, I do not understand why you brought it up. You'll need to enlighten me on that part. 

Moi ? Enlighten anyone here ? 

Perhaps you'll find answers around the corner, keep searching.

What are you even talking about?

There was a time I worked as a day laborer. Showed up each morning and prayed to be sent out on a job, to be paid at the end of the day minimum wage. The only job I've ever walked away from , declined to do was in New Orleans. Assigned to the boat yards. A humongous oil tanker was docked. Job was scrubbing the empty holding tanks by hand. One guy at the bottom, holding the ladder, one guy at the top doing the same. 3rd guy 1/2 up the 200foot ladder doing the scrubbing. Positions rotated each hour. End of day $40 Cash. Yea, right. I said to the fellow wino next to me as the job was being described - I'll be walking back to the shelter !

Randomness ... as observed and measured in the macro or micro.

"so. roulette....if the number 31 hasnt come up in 300 spins, then what would compel u to play it on the next spin ? how do u make the case ?"

thats sound a lot like the 'gambler fallacy'. i.e. when you have a repeating random and you have to make choices on a one by one case, you should ignore previous results. (assuming the roulette dont has bias)
for example, this is different from black jack randomness, which has a limited amount of cards and each hand 'influence' the next one, and previous results should be considered.
but i really know very little about roulette's, check for yourself and see if this apply...
https://www.investopedia.com/terms/g/gamblersfallacy.asp

"Maybe yes, maybe no. exactly? we dont know : )
Sounds random to me !"

lol. yes, i agree. ..by elroch definition(lack of knowledge). but need to be careful when applying this, because it only apply to an observer, and ignore the event itself. hope that i make some sense : )

im not sure what you mean by "chaotic" but i think that you mean "truly random".
usually when saying "chaotic" it mean a small change that develop exponentially onto a large change. like in meteorology (weather systems) or the famous butterfly effect.

I mentioned QM because its the only place i can think of that true randomness may happen (but we don't really know)

Are you familiar with the Chaos theory? 

very lightly

If you aren't I strongly recommend you to read about that. It explains what I said about chaotic 

it would be nice if you explain how it relate to dice.. im lazy too : )

Oh, alright. I will later (when I have more time) explain what I meant then. Other than that. As I have stated before, nothing is theoretical random. We just lack the power or sometimes understanding to know the outcome. Just with quantum mechanics. Where we just lack the skill to predict the position of a electron. 

I will. I'm in class at the moment. When I get home I can try to explain how I think. But it somewhat correlates to the longer post I have been writing here 

i think that in QM it gets a little more involved that that, and the only place i can think of true random is the wave function collapse. but we dont know if it really collapse, just one interpretation.

ok thanks.

lol. yes king, it has something to do with chickening too.. but i would say only 1/2 chicken. like a peruvian bbq : )
I mean.. the whole idea was to experience the freedom of flying, and being strap like that? didnt seem so cool. like the difference between riding a bike, or taking the rear seat.

i was thinking that its going to be a short class and then be on my way flying on my own. guess i just didnt think it thru : )

u should be able to find it in Complex Systems > Nonlinear Dynamics > Chaos 

im looking at it now and its... hmm... complex : ) but when i think of true random, it must be an event that is.. 'without a cause' ? .. that probably a bad way to put it, but is the best i can think of right now

A coin flip, or moreso, a die rolling out #'s, is pretty simple. things get more interesting with 38 #'s like roulette. or let alone the powerball.

some numbers will just go away for a long-long time. and then the opposite happens. numbers will appear and reappear and just keep coming up blowing up any ideas about using math rationale in the short term. And casinos know this. and trust me. they're a for-profit group and they've looked into this quite helladeeply (to be conservative !). so wut do they do ?....they limit ppl's hi-size bets so u dont work them in like 3 spins. its their only protection against getting smoked....lol !   

Physicists like to think that all you have to say, these are the conditions, now what happens next? Richard P. Feynman

Where chaos begins, classical science stops. - James Gleick Author of CHAOS Making a New Science

In it he asks:

In a universe ruled by entropy, drawing inexorably toward greater and greater disorder, how does order arise?

For the original explorers of Chaos, a starting point was the Butterfly Effect.

For want of a nail, the shoe was lost;

For want of a shoe, the horse was lost;

For want of a horse, the rider was lost;

For want of a rider, the battle was lost;

For want of a battle, the kingdom was lost !