Does True Randomness Actually Exist? ( ^&*#^%$&#% )

We agree that MWI is a valid interpretation of quantum mechanics.

would u pleez stop tryn2mix these two ? ur pathetically hung up in a delusional romantasy. this is just another one a ur pitiful drifts from the SM. so either take a break or take a pill.   ::/

opti, realize that the SM is their biggest archenemy. im pretty sure they have a deep-deep hate for it. they look for any way that they can to express themselves. and so it ends up thru heady fantasy. they seek beauty in their U and cant find satisfaction so they start making stuff up and argue like he!! for its side. iows, they use the foundations of the SM to defend their very own private luvfest.

crazy as it sounds ?...i luv that theyve found s/t to try2show us their <3. but to hide behind reason & logic and deny the emotion of love (their very essence) makes it all really-really sick. im sorry.

I’m perfectly fine with you holding a scientific seminar titled “Random sequences as defined by our ability to predict them.” Discussion would center about specific observations. Debate over exotic events being random or not. All well and good in keeping with the original definition.

The problem arises when the interpretation of the seminar subsequently gets understood as confirmation for the existence of randomness in the universe. That it was discovered events happened by chance.
Way too much info filled with complications.

Because a reason is not found to explain the origin of something - it should not be assumed things happpen by chance/random.

A good example of an assumption made that lacks any empirical evidence. With a created/designed universe it’s assumed the universe to be of a deterministic nature. A natural conclusion. If it’s believed the universe began by chance only following its own physical laws - it’s assumed events in that universe happen by chance. A natural conclusion. But none of it actually proves it’s existence. Only that stuff looks like it by your definitions.

After all if everything were found to be predetermined then a Reason for our existence would exist. No right scientist would permit such a thought 🙃

opti.. listen to mustang.. if we go by elroch definition.. it just like changing the title to..

“Random sequences as defined by our ability to predict them.”

think thats cool? its like he dont want the Q. "does TR exist" to be asked in the first place. funny! : )

I’m open to “other worlds”

Just not outside our own. 

Perhaps other worlds exist, but only within the one we see. 

Right you are. Chapter 5 of Robert Cialdini's book 'Influence' reminds me of your quote.

" Liking: The Friendly Thief"

It's a weapon of influence of course. Cialdini notes that this liking rule is then professionally exploited in many ways. Interpersonal relationships etc.. Was going to insert an lol here but nah..

Why? As vast as the universe is there are no other planets capable of supporting life?

How old are you anyway?

I suggest Axel making yourself aware of the  Multi-verse concept. MV or MW - Many Worlds

Before shouting your mouth off about how old am I . The MW has nothing to do with whether or not other planets can support life. Geez people here ready at the trigger. Simple references get easily abused. Since when does “other worlds “ mean “life on other planets “? An assumption ready made to go in the attack. These people are boring and tiresome. Waste of energy here.

Same show as Opti who can only respond in a singular fashion.... as he’s convinced I’m an ID’er despite my dozens of explanations to the contrary. There can be no honest discussion with such, so mistakenly misguided and judgemental continuing to provide false info.  

Oh stop with the horse **** and answer the question.

Don’t get your hopes up 😎

I'll be back shortly, and try to clear things up for you.

Playing games now are we Axel? 
Sandbox stuff, deleting posts, reposting - childish stuff

Texting and driving are a big no no out here Mustang Sally. Now, I believe this came up before in one of our previous discussions, and you never answered quite satisfactory.

Quick interruption though, I can still clearly see that you are the same liar now as you were back then. Flat out bold faced liar not even worth developing a rapore with.

But I'm in this far so here is the question again.. Life in this universe, this one got it? No? Life in this one?

Do you want to ask if aliens exists or not?

I definitely can see Axels logic. I’m a bold face liar yet he comes to me for an answers.  On about something or other. Why be asking me about life on other planets? The answer is no - No lie. There remains to be any evidence. I don’t believe things are possible/not possible based on probabilities.

If your asking me, I would say let's start with plant and animal life first and see where that takes us.

But really, I've dealt with this guy before and would just like to get a straight answer out of him for once. Scratch that, I think my evaluation of him is done now. (UNHEALTHY).

If we see for probability I can surely alien  exists. Do I need to explain?

Please enumerate. And don’t forget to include the part where we’re  told the proof lies in the maths. It’s comforting to know we are not the only ones. I’ll rest better tonight. Won’t be feeling so lonely.

Ok let's see how one second on earth goes like—
9003 tweets 
2918134 Emails sent
84387 YouTube videos viewed 
83377 Google searches 
740,000 WhatsApp messages 
So this was internet data of one second. You can ask me the source 
Now let's talk life—
1.80 humans dies in a sec.
4.3 births per second.
Why I m talking about this? What's the connection?
Well this shows what actually we do is not only done by us. Most of the time every action is simultaneously done by more than a person. This all happens on a single planet of land area 510.1 million kilometers square.
More than a hundred life ends and starts in a minute.
This earth is even less than a size of a cell for a body called universe.
Now you expect that all those figures above happens only on this negligible size planet.
You can expect water sources in a 200 km range in a desert but can't expect to have two or more water sources in a 1×10³⁰+ km range in universe?
This means life exists . Not only on a micron sized dot called earth but maybe on a trillion planets. We're not only one to send a mail at any instant in this dot.  Then how can it be that only we live in a place containing centillions of such dots. Still it can't be conformed that alien exists. But probability tells that we are not alone to have eyes and ears in this whole universe....
Try to understand I m not a philosopher but don't believe in complete randomness....any questions?