Additionally, if you are an aspiring physicist, have a deep zeal for physics but haven't had the courage to study it formally, or are a ridiculously proficient theoretical physicist whose expertise ranges from grievous quantum field theory to the redundant fluid dynamics (no intention of fomenting an uproar from engineers) and, I stress, wish to immerse themselves into the ultimate complexities seething in the math, post under the accelerated Feynmanism forum that I will devise shortly within time of post. Kindly employ Math Jax for any necessary mathematical formatting, which willing participants will hopefully convert to a readable mathematical form. I seriously doubt many will wish to be part of this accelerated Feynmanism as on chess.com forums, there is a huge absence of commenters, and because few have adequate time to pore over long mathematical works. Nonetheless, I have established it in the name of our great lord, Richard Feynman.
Feynmanism
Feynman was really good at explaining complex things simply, sooooo ...care to explain more simply? 
(cuz I’m too lazy to read the whole thing)
Feynman was really good at explaining complex things simply, sooooo ...care to explain more simply? (cuz I’m too lazy to read the whole thing)
The Feynmanism cult has unfortunately been forsaken. Insufficient members displayed any form of zeal.
Feynman was really good at explaining complex things simply, sooooo ...care to explain more simply? (cuz I’m too lazy to read the whole thing)
But essentially, this forum thread is dedicated to reverence of Richard Feynman, the top notch physicist, I'm certain we've all heard about (although his surname didn't become synonymous with genius as with Einstein; shame). In his junior years, at Caltech, he had a rivalry with Murray Gell Mann, another physicist but lesser known. Gell Mann worked heavily on the theory of elementary particles, while Feynman dedicated his time to electromagnetism, QED and what not.
So this forum thread wants us to comment on the sheer brilliance and even quirks of Feynman!
Feynman was really good at explaining complex things simply, sooooo ...care to explain more simply? (cuz I’m too lazy to read the whole thing)
But essentially, this forum thread is dedicated to reverence of Richard Feynman, the top notch physicist, I'm certain we've all heard about (although his surname didn't become synonymous with genius as with Einstein; shame). In his junior years, at Caltech, he had a rivalry with Murray Gell Mann, another physicist but lesser known. Gell Mann worked heavily on the theory of elementary particles, while Feynman dedicated his time to electromagnetism, QED and what not.
So this forum thread wants us to comment on the sheer brilliance and even quirks of Feynman!
You could have just said this (bolded part)
Salutations, fellow fries.
I wish to establish the Feynmanism cult, in which we can ultimately enrich the mind in tandem with enjoying remarkable chess games. Our activities will be primarily devoted to the conceptual understandings of Feynman's line of work, rather than the intensive mathematical mull.
As part of a collaboration conquest, we can establish firm dogmas in the name of Feynmanism, promoting the capacity of the mind as a whole and revering the great Richard himself. By actually getting vast insights into him, we can learn a great deal and our reverence is put to magnificent fruit. Wir shalt rise as enthusiasts, inexperienced in the line of work our great master engages in, and that is our primary principle. As Feynmanists, we abstain from insane amounts of prolonging over the mathematical details of Feynman's line of work, but rather immerse ourselves solely in the concepts. By noon, we shall seize the Gell Manner's conscience and revolutionise our own microscopic Caltech.
Nothing personal, Gell Manners. Just a prime way to exploit all the treachery.
If you are willing to be an integral part in the ultimate dogma scheme, post in the generic comments below your knowledge of Feynman.