I'm ten so yeah I'm not nearly as smart as half of the people on the websiteÂ
Going to close my account!
Sort:
Johan201023 wrote:
EamonB1 wrote:
Johan201023 wrote:
THAT'S IT.
I AM GETTING A MOD OR A STAFF HERE TELLING TO DELETE THIS THREAD.
AND I REPORTED MANY PEOPLE WHO COMMENTED HERE NOW.
Buddy you're overreacting. this is why people under thirteen belong on chesskid.
if this seams overreacting then you can take it for yourself.Â
Â
I don't think there is a rule like people under thirteen belong on chesskid
You look like a kid . You certainly belong more to chesskid.
and technically there is an min age limit for chess.com but nobody cares about it
the min age is 18 years
yal_the_cat wrote:
EamonB1 wrote:
yal_the_cat wrote:
Anonymous_Dragon wrote:
EamonB1 wrote:
Johan201023 wrote:
THAT'S IT.
I AM GETTING A MOD OR A STAFF HERE TELLING TO DELETE THIS THREAD.
AND I REPORTED MANY PEOPLE WHO COMMENTED HERE NOW.
Buddy you're overreacting. this is why people under thirteen belong on chesskid.
Exactly
I'll see myself out
I was talking about the maturity levels of a ten year old boy but I'd be a hypocrite if I got involved in people closing their accounts. (I'm not here for the account closing I'm here to [do a bad job of it] defuse the drama).
but you see, I'm not 13 yet
I'm not going to stop anyone from being on here before the applicable age, I don't have that power. And besides, if you have enough self control, why does it matter?
sarthoba wrote:
but on chess.kid there are no strong plays
true
hayden_wills wrote:
and technically there is an min age limit for chess.com but nobody cares about it
the min age is 18 years
I am above 18 . So idc
Johan201023 wrote:
reported.
Bruh noone cares.
EamonB1 wrote:
yal_the_cat wrote:
EamonB1 wrote:
yal_the_cat wrote:
Anonymous_Dragon wrote:
EamonB1 wrote:
Johan201023 wrote:
THAT'S IT.
I AM GETTING A MOD OR A STAFF HERE TELLING TO DELETE THIS THREAD.
AND I REPORTED MANY PEOPLE WHO COMMENTED HERE NOW.
Buddy you're overreacting. this is why people under thirteen belong on chesskid.
Exactly
I'll see myself out
I was talking about the maturity levels of a ten year old boy but I'd be a hypocrite if I got involved in people closing their accounts. (I'm not here for the account closing I'm here to [do a bad job of it] defuse the drama).
but you see, I'm not 13 yet
I'm not going to stop anyone from being on here before the applicable age, I don't have that power. And besides, if you have enough self control, why does it matter?
idkÂ
CongoratsUlost2me wrote:
Because it may lead to depression for you it will be better if you close and study for your exams.
boooooooo exams are sooo boring I lost half of my tv time to study 
hayden_wills wrote:
and technically there is an min age limit for chess.com but nobody cares about it
the min age is 18 years
And where is that mentioned ... big brainÂ
13
Â
In general, ChessKid's content and format is designed for kids up to age 13, but even older kids can benefit from the site. ChessKid.com is created for students from absolute beginners up to a chess rating of about 1600, and there's new content added all the time!
Anonymous_Dragon wrote:
hayden_wills wrote:
and technically there is an min age limit for chess.com but nobody cares about it
the min age is 18 years
I am above 18 . So idc
iMaGiNe bEiNg aBoVe 18, cAnT rElAtE
Anonymous_Dragon wrote:
Johan201023 wrote:
EamonB1 wrote:
Johan201023 wrote:
THAT'S IT.
I AM GETTING A MOD OR A STAFF HERE TELLING TO DELETE THIS THREAD.
AND I REPORTED MANY PEOPLE WHO COMMENTED HERE NOW.
Buddy you're overreacting. this is why people under thirteen belong on chesskid.
if this seams overreacting then you can take it for yourself.Â
Â
I don't think there is a rule like people under thirteen belong on chesskid
You look like a kid . You certainly belong more to chesskid.
I think it's something along the lines of if you're under thirteen you should either be supervised on here (which Johan obviously isn't) or you should be on chesskid.
hayden_wills wrote:
13
Â
In general, ChessKid's content and format is designed for kids up to age 13, but even older kids can benefit from the site. ChessKid.com is created for students from absolute beginners up to a chess rating of about 1600, and there's new content added all the time!
THEN GO THERE TO LEARN SOMETHING USEFUL YOU DON'T EVEN HAVE A RATING!!!
EamonB1 wrote:
Anonymous_Dragon wrote:
Johan201023 wrote:
EamonB1 wrote:
Johan201023 wrote:
THAT'S IT.
I AM GETTING A MOD OR A STAFF HERE TELLING TO DELETE THIS THREAD.
AND I REPORTED MANY PEOPLE WHO COMMENTED HERE NOW.
Buddy you're overreacting. this is why people under thirteen belong on chesskid.
if this seams overreacting then you can take it for yourself.Â
Â
I don't think there is a rule like people under thirteen belong on chesskid
You look like a kid . You certainly belong more to chesskid.
I think it's something along the lines of if you're under thirteen you should either be supervised on here (which Johan obviously isn't) or you should be on chesskid.
Yes
Jan 2, 2021
0
#418
by the way i am mailing some things to chess.com about this.
hayden_wills wrote:
13
Â
In general, ChessKid's content and format is designed for kids up to age 13, but even older kids can benefit from the site. ChessKid.com is created for students from absolute beginners up to a chess rating of about 1600, and there's new content added all the time!
How does this say anything bout an age limit in chess.comÂ
THAT'S IT.
I AM GETTING A MOD OR A STAFF HERE TELLING TO DELETE THIS THREAD.
AND I REPORTED MANY PEOPLE WHO COMMENTED HERE NOW.
Buddy you're overreacting. this is why people under thirteen belong on chesskid.
if this seams overreacting then you can take it for yourself.Â
Â
I don't think there is a rule like people under thirteen belong on chesskid
There is no rule for it but chesskid was made for a reason right ?