Is RAR illegal?
Sort:
NM
LogoCzar
Aug 16, 2017
0
#21
You can aim to become a chess master, study super hard, and also RAR on the side! Take it from me - it's possible.
It's dumb. I don't really care that much, but it's incredibly juvenile. I practically immediately lose respect for anyone who's part of the group.
ROL
Aug 16, 2017
0
#24
WeakChessPlayedSlow wrote:
It's dumb. I don't really care that much, but it's incredibly juvenile. I practically immediately lose respect for anyone who's part of the group.
Give me some respect, I play weak chess fast!
RookSacrifice wrote:
WeakChessPlayedSlow wrote:
It's dumb. I don't really care that much, but it's incredibly juvenile. I practically immediately lose respect for anyone who's part of the group.
Give me some respect, I play weak chess fast!
ROL
WeakChessPlayedSlow wrote:
It's dumb. I don't really care that much, but it's incredibly juvenile. I practically immediately lose respect for anyone who's part of the group.
So, you think it's dumb, incredibly juvenile and you lose respect immediately for anyone who is in the group? "I don't really care that much" It sounds like you care....
Idk what it even means so
Aug 16, 2017
0
#29
@LLCA123newaccount From the RAR FAQ:
What is RAR?
To answer that question will require decades of deep thought and meditation. RAR is infinitely complicated. In a nutshell, RAR is a movement that encourages doing illegal but winning ideas, being annoying, and having fun. If you say RAR, and follow the RAR tips, at a tournament, you can intimidate your opponent. Then they will play way worse than their rating and you can win on luck, without any skill! So you can both be lazy and win! RAR!
I recently got eliminated from the RAR world cup, but at least I got to round 3.
I don't care, because I don't take the chess.com forums that seriously. With that said, RAR is a cancer on the forums. Seriously. Every time I see someone talking about RAR on the forums, they are under 13, under 1500 (hell, that's even generous) and painfully unfunny. I get it, I used to think I was funny online, despite just embarrassing myself, but have some respect for yourselves. Please at least keep your idiocy where it is right now: Off Topic. But again, since I don't care about the chess.com forums, I don't care about you, either. If I did care about the chess.com forums, I absolutely would, but I don't.
I'm 1896 USCF. I beat 2 experts in my last OTB tournament. I've been over 2200 on blitz/bullet on chess.com and over 2000 standard.
I'm 16 years old.
I find RAR funny.
Congratulations. You're still an idiot. What, 1896 USCF? That makes you good? No, it doesn't. 1800s are weak, you folks are barely even capable of making plans. You beat 2 experts in your last OTB tournament? I have a 63% record against 2000s in the last 12 months. In fact, I'm even a year younger than you! RAR isn't funny. Stop polluting the forums with your garbage.
Aug 16, 2017
0
#35
WeakChessPlayedSlow wrote:
Congratulations. You're still an idiot.
Sound familiar? Looks like a troll showed up.
Aug 16, 2017
0
#36
Don't think hatred of RAR is original, it isn't. You aren't special. From the first attack of the anti-RAR to this most recent attack, many people have been scared of the RAR movement and therefore attempted to take it down with criticism. But RAR will never die. It only gets bigger and bigger.
HiRARious (That's Korean)
Damn, just when I thought was special. Also, you aren't some oppressed movement, stop talking like that. Grow up.
Aug 16, 2017
0
#39
WeakChessPlayedSlow wrote:
I don't care, because I don't take the chess.com forums that seriously. With that said, RAR is a cancer on the forums. Seriously. Every time I see someone talking about RAR on the forums, they are under 13, under 1500 (hell, that's even generous) and painfully unfunny. I get it, I used to think I was funny online, despite just embarrassing myself, but have some respect for yourselves. Please at least keep your idiocy where it is right now: Off Topic. But again, since I don't care about the chess.com forums, I don't care about you, either. If I did care about the chess.com forums, I absolutely would, but I don't.
You're missing something.
