is water wet?


I said “on something”, not “onto something”.

Take a hotdog for instance
The inside of a hotdog is hotdog
That is why it isn’t hollow
This, a hotdog contains hotdog
(Sorry, it’s a bad analogy, but it’s the best I could come up with)

That’s like saying the money is the wallet simply because it is inside of the wallet. Or like saying that a toy is the box because it is inside of a box.

Take a hotdog for instance
The inside of a hotdog is hotdog
That is why it isn’t hollow
This, a hotdog contains hotdog
(Sorry, it’s a bad analogy, but it’s the best I could come up with)
No; hot-dogs are usually made with bread and sausages, not other hot-dogs.

Why? Please provide a counter-argument.
"Playing 4d chess against someone who's winning by eating the pieces"
#67, i kinda do and dont agree....
Like, if your saying that a hotdog is a hotdog because it is 100% a hotdog, then sure, that makes sense because thats literally the identity property of equality, or 1=1.
However, if your saying that a hotdog has another hotdog in it, i dont agree because 1≠2.
*this opinion is only for the hotdog analogy, not for the actual water question*


No water isn't real y'all it just a simulation of the Matrix yes I said your favorite word THE BACKROOM'S pay attention now because Joe Biden controls the weather and so in conclusion fish doesn't come from gas station sushi.
No water isn't real y'all it just a simulation of the Matrix yes I said your favorite word THE BACKROOM'S pay attention now because Joe Biden controls the weather and so in conclusion fish doesn't come from gas station sushi.
right. and birds aren't real.

I’m saying that a single hotdog is made up of hotdog (its insides are hotdog, not steak or something)
Not that there is a separate hotdog inside of another hotdog