then you're not a people
Let us solve life.

If you don't have a head then how would you hiccup
Are you saying people without heads can't hiccup?
How discriminatory is that?

If you don't have a head then how would you hiccup
Are you saying people without heads can't hiccup?
How discriminatory is that?
because they can't, and we're complimenting those people, because they have the ability to not hiccup
Also if you don't have a head, you're not a people
A headless people isn't a people.
That's what you're saying.

Solve hiccups by not hiccuping.
Solve food by not eating.
Hiccups are something you do. Food is a noun that is not related to any verb. Like solve pooping by not pooping makes sense (kinda)
Are you saying that only verbs fit in there?
What about the other types of words, huh? HUH?

Solve hiccups by not hiccuping.
Solve food by not eating.
Hiccups are something you do. Food is a noun that is not related to any verb. Like solve pooping by not pooping makes sense (kinda)
Are you saying that only verbs fit in there?
What about the other types of words, huh? HUH?
It's philosophy and logic. Like A is solved by not doing A, only if A has relation to a verb.
Philosophy is the exact antonym of logic.
They can't be both.

Solve hiccups by not hiccuping.
Solve food by not eating.
Hiccups are something you do. Food is a noun that is not related to any verb. Like solve pooping by not pooping makes sense (kinda)
Are you saying that only verbs fit in there?
What about the other types of words, huh? HUH?
It's philosophy and logic. Like A is solved by not doing A, only if A has relation to a verb.
you mean common sense?

Solve hiccups by not hiccuping.
Solve food by not eating.
Hiccups are something you do. Food is a noun that is not related to any verb. Like solve pooping by not pooping makes sense (kinda)
Are you saying that only verbs fit in there?
What about the other types of words, huh? HUH?
It's philosophy and logic. Like A is solved by not doing A, only if A has relation to a verb.
Philosophy is the exact antonym of logic.
They can't be both.
Well I said something wrong, but antonym????????? Logic is a branch of philosophy, you cockroach
You've heard my philosophy, and I am the best philosopher on chess.com.
Does my philosophy sound like logic? No.
Does any good philosophy make logical sense? Almost never.

Solve hiccups by not hiccuping.
Solve food by not eating.
Hiccups are something you do. Food is a noun that is not related to any verb. Like solve pooping by not pooping makes sense (kinda)
Are you saying that only verbs fit in there?
What about the other types of words, huh? HUH?
It's philosophy and logic. Like A is solved by not doing A, only if A has relation to a verb.
Philosophy is the exact antonym of logic.
They can't be both.
Well I said something wrong, but antonym????????? Logic is a branch of philosophy, you cockroach
You've heard my philosophy, and I am the best philosopher on chess.com.
Does my philosophy sound like logic? No.
Does any good philosophy make logical sense? Almost never.
now u r just admitting that u r a bad philosopher
No. I'm saying philosophy shouldn't be logical.
Drink water 7 times in a row while moving your head up and down
What if you don't have a head?