Let's get it straight: En passant isn't cheating.

Sort:
Platypus
SNUDOO wrote:

HHHHAAAAAAAACKKER

lol

MorphysMayhem

The reason for the En Passant rule is that the original rules of chess allowed for a pawn move of only one square - not two, like the rules allow now. 

So if you imagine someone moving only one square in the diagram above, the pawn would be able to be captured. 

Over the years (hundreds) there have been some rule changes such as castling (which was not in the original rules of the game). The rules were changed to speed up the game. (Can you imagine how many moves and how clunky it would be to castle by hand - meaning getting all the pieces out of the way and getting you king safe in the corner.

So when they added the rule that allowed the pawns to move two squares in stead of just one, they recognized that unless they added the En Passant rule, someone could avoid being captured simply by moving two squares. They decided that the opponent should be able to capture the pawn, but only has the right to do so if they do it immediately. 

sndeww
Morphys-Revenge wrote:

The reason for the En Passant rule is that the original rules of chess allowed for a pawn move of only one square - not two, like the rules allow now. 

So if you imagine someone moving only one square in the diagram above, the pawn would be able to be captured. 

Over the years (hundreds) there have been some rule changes such as castling (which was not in the original rules of the game). The rules were changed to speed up the game. (Can you imagine how many moves and how clunky it would be to castle by hand - meaning getting all the pieces out of the way and getting you king safe in the corner.

So when they added the rule that allowed the pawns to move two squares in stead of just one, they recognized that unless they added the En Passant rule, someone could avoid being captured simply by moving two squares. They decided that the opponent should be able to capture the pawn, but only has the right to do so if they do it immediately. 

cult

Platypus

https://www.google.com/search?q=en+passant&rlz=1C1CHBF_enUS878US878&oq=en+passant&aqs=chrome..69i57j0l4j69i60l3.4642j1j7&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8 its shows the truth

Platypus
1_a31-0 wrote:

EN PEASANT IS CHEATING 

https://www.chess.com/forum/view/general/his-pawn-cheated-and-killed-my-pawn?page=8#comment-49803526

https://www.google.com/search?q=en+passant&rlz=1C1CHBF_enUS878US878&oq=en+passant&aqs=chrome..69i57j0l4j69i60l3.4642j1j7&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8

sndeww

cult.

MorphysMayhem

The rule was added to chess around 1550 - like 470 years ago. 

 

Sir-Foxy
checkmateohwait wrote:

Let's get it straight: En passant isn't cheating.

Or is it?

Vsauce.

Michael here.

 

 

"In ancient Tibet, the sultan was known as Lekhshey and had an odd habit of moving only diagonally across the palace grounds. This is thought to be the inspiration for the precursor to modern chess . . . "

ChessSensasian
Morphys-Revenge wrote:

The rule was added to chess around 1550 - like 470 years ago. 

 

Seems legit

pizzalord420

I think we're missing the point. What rule allows a pawn to move three squares on the first turn?

ChessSensasian
pizzalord420 wrote:

I think we're missing the point. What rule allows a pawn to move three squares on the first turn?

No pawn is able to move 3 squares on the first turn. Only 1 or 2 spaces

Platypus

the guy who created the forum blocked everyone that said en passant is real

ChessSensasian
chessPlatypus01 wrote:

the guy who created the forum blocked everyone that said en passant is real

Seriously? This forum? Or which forum?

st0ckfish
chessPlatypus01 wrote:

the guy who created the forum blocked everyone that said en passant is real

Cuz we have zero tolerance for hackers like you who try to exploit glitches to win games.

ChessSensasian
1_a31-0 wrote:
chessPlatypus01 wrote:

the guy who created the forum blocked everyone that said en passant is real

Cuz we have zero tolerance for hackers like you who try to exploit glitches to win games.

HAHAHAHA! 

I learned to play last year and even I know that en passant is a thing

Sir-Foxy

Bro, that troll topic so such obviously trolling that I didn't even bother reading past the first post.

OP's rating was 2100. It's just a big joke

st0ckfish
ChessSensasian wrote:
1_a31-0 wrote:
chessPlatypus01 wrote:

the guy who created the forum blocked everyone that said en passant is real

Cuz we have zero tolerance for hackers like you who try to exploit glitches to win games.

HAHAHAHA! 

I learned to play last year and even I know that en passant is a thing

I learned to play last year as well

st0ckfish
Sir-Foxy wrote:

Bro, that troll topic so such obviously trolling that I didn't even bother reading past the first post.

OP's rating was 2100. It's just a big joke

He is 1100 daily. Daily is the most accurate measurement of rating for strong players 

ChessSensasian
1_a31-0 wrote:
Sir-Foxy wrote:

Bro, that troll topic so such obviously trolling that I didn't even bother reading past the first post.

OP's rating was 2100. It's just a big joke

He is 1100 daily. Daily is the most accurate measurement of rating for strong players 

Eh...I can sort of agree with you on that. 

But most strong chess players play blitz or rapid...

st0ckfish
ChessSensasian wrote:
1_a31-0 wrote:
Sir-Foxy wrote:

Bro, that troll topic so such obviously trolling that I didn't even bother reading past the first post.

OP's rating was 2100. It's just a big joke

He is 1100 daily. Daily is the most accurate measurement of rating for strong players 

Eh...I can sort of agree with you on that. 

But most strong chess players play blitz or rapid...

Yes because daily chess doesn’t have any cheaters, so it’s very accurate.