'Carlson's, psychological- competitive, 'blind-spot'. - But, it's All a 'mass illusion', Anyway! ..So who cares!? ..lol
'Carlson's, psychological- competitive, 'blind-spot'. - But, it's All a 'mass illusion', Anyway! ..So who cares!? ..lol
A response of "neither" to those two choices indicates life is neither meaningful nor meaningless. Since it can't be meaningful and meaningless at the same time, it either has meaning or it doesn't. Therefore "neither" isn't an adequate answer and as a result, is incorrect.
'Carlson's, psychological- competitive, 'blind-spot'. - But, it's All a 'mass illusion', Anyway! ..So who cares!? ..lol
Not the indolent!
Was it Ferlinghetti who said,
"Ah day is done Day is done
And fish float through the trees
eating the seeds of the sun
O man in saffron
in the Golden Gate chanting
Hare Krishna squatting
lotus among the fern-fronds
At sundown no more Krishna
The fern-fronds unrolled"
In this sense it may appear to be meaningless and beautiful.
You are an optimist for you believe there is meaning in life.
You possess an internalist view meaning you believe life's meaning
comes from within and what meaning you place on it.
You feel the value of experiencing beauty in life is meaningful if I understood you correctly.
A response of "neither" to those two choices indicates life is neither meaningful nor meaningless.
No. 'Neither' referred to 'optimism' and 'pessimism'. The meaningful/less part came after 'optimism' was given a green light. Since that's not it, there is no reference to meaning, since its inference was incorrect.
First, the false must go: both 'optimism' and 'pessimism'--there is no meaning there.
You are stuck with an object. Therefore meaning is not. As long as there is a subject, life is meaningless. Very, very simple.
Quite useless for the meaningless subject to be looking for meaning!!
What beauty, Tom? Your perception of beauty is dependent on an object, therefore that is your perception of what you grew accustomed to label beauty, as opposed to ugly.
That is not beauty. Don't use that word. Stick to beautiful. Always be clear about what you're doing.
I almost wasn't going, to the bother, of mentioning it.. but in # 48.. Though 'troy' typed - - Not the indolent! .. In the context, of his reply ..{if word definitions, mean anything! .. The correct response, would've been - Surely, the indolent! .. Unless, I'm 'missing' a sarcasm, there!?
The indolent doesn't care. About any illusions, mass or individual. 'He' is on automatic pilot: illusions or not, he's going after what he likes and rewards him with mental pleasure.
'troy' .. My 'bad' .. I'll blame it on my 'constipation' {True}.. And, a modicum plus, amount, of 'angst'.. that comes froom being, normal 'aware' of everything! .. Even, the outside 'traffic noise' on a depressing 'rainy' day.. Alone! ..{though, I can easily imagine, 'having company' as potentially, Worse!}. ..ha!
A subject looking for meaning is never going to find it, for its existence limits the vastness of life.
When the subject dies, meaning is revealed, uninvited.
Even, the outside 'traffic noise' on a depressing 'rainy' day..
A rainy day is neither 'depressing', nor 'uplifting'. Beauty is everywhere, anytime.
It doesn't come as a reward for not living. Expecting a reward denies death. Expecting is part of living, so extending it beyond death is impossible. There is no peeking.
Optimism or pessimism?
Neither.