Someone being all-powerful isn’t an intelligent concept in the first place.
Martux's crappy philosophy - the omnipotent contradiction
#1 what you says implies there being no meaning to the word omnipotence. but if I claim that omnipotence does have a meaning I could just say that an omnipotent being being non-omnipotent isn't possible. therefore an omnipotent being being non-omnipotent isn't a thing which exists, and so part of the group of things that an omnipotent being can do or part of the group of things an omnipotent being can't do, it just doesn't exist as a thing.
You can't say an omnipotent being can create a square which is a circle, because it's just a thing which can not exsit.
Someone being all-powerful isn’t an intelligent concept in the first place.
why not
#1 what you says implies there being no meaning to the word omnipotence. but if I claim that omnipotence does have a meaning I could just say that an omnipotent being being non-omnipotent isn't possible. therefore an omnipotent being being non-omnipotent isn't a thing which exists, and so part of the group of things that an omnipotent being can do or part of the group of things an omnipotent being can't do, it just doesn't exist as a thing.
yeah thats fair
Hi im martux
So someone who is omnipotent is able to be and do wtv they feel like, except they actually cant cuz they cant be non-omnipotent therefore theyre not omnipotent since theres smth they cant be.
Any thoughts?