IPL 2019

Sort:
Avatar of flyinggmachine
sougataghosh wrote:

Still 5 would've been required then, not super over directly

wrong, dube, didnt complete 1 run, since 6  was wanted , he hit the ball, and he didnt complete his run, so it would have been a super over only, 

Avatar of edr0nt
ConfusedSpirit wrote:
sougataghosh wrote:

Dube hit a six earlier, de Villiers was on field as well, it could've gone either way

RCB supporters and players always imagine, it could have gone either way or it must have happened like that, but they always score runs at the wrong time, and fail to score runs when they have to

You know there have been cases where 6 off 1 ball was required and they had been hit (1 Example: Nidahas Trophy)

Avatar of edr0nt
ConfusedSpirit wrote:
sougataghosh wrote:

Still 5 would've been required then, not super over directly

wrong, dube, didnt complete 1 run, since 6  was wanted , he hit the ball, and he didnt complete his run, so it would have been a super over only, 

Yeah, because umpire didn't signal a no-ball then, so they thought it was useless

Avatar of edr0nt

If no-ball+1 run while running, then de Villiers on strike with 5 needed off 1, and we all know AB's talented enough to have a chance of making that happen

Avatar of flyinggmachine
sougataghosh wrote:
ConfusedSpirit wrote:
sougataghosh wrote:

Still 5 would've been required then, not super over directly

wrong, dube, didnt complete 1 run, since 6  was wanted , he hit the ball, and he didnt complete his run, so it would have been a super over only, 

Yeah, because umpire didn't signal a no-ball then, so they thought it was useless

but still after a no-ball(which umpires didnt give) they still needed 7 runs to win, which was again impossible for them, malinga would ahve defended it, Malinga is very experienced, this is very practical, since RCB never makes use of its chances given to it, but MI sometimes uses its chances it gets!!!!!)

Avatar of edr0nt
ConfusedSpirit wrote:
sougataghosh wrote:
ConfusedSpirit wrote:
sougataghosh wrote:

Still 5 would've been required then, not super over directly

wrong, dube, didnt complete 1 run, since 6  was wanted , he hit the ball, and he didnt complete his run, so it would have been a super over only, 

Yeah, because umpire didn't signal a no-ball then, so they thought it was useless

but still after a no-ball(which umpires didnt give) they still needed 7 runs to win, which was again impossible for them, malinga would ahve defended it, Malinga is very experienced, this is very practical, since RCB never makes use of its chances given to it, but MI sometimes uses its chances it gets!!!!!)

As I said, no-ball+1 (=2). They would've run if the umpire had signalled it, cuz they know ABD CAN do it

Avatar of flyinggmachine

With VK as India's WC captain, I dont think india can win WC, or only if Dhoni will handle the pressure and do the required things for team and handle VK's pressure in the final / SEMI Final matches of India if it reaches , ONLY THEN iNDIA Can lift World cup, sadly sad.png 

Avatar of flyinggmachine
sougataghosh wrote:
ConfusedSpirit wrote:
sougataghosh wrote:
ConfusedSpirit wrote:
sougataghosh wrote:

Still 5 would've been required then, not super over directly

wrong, dube, didnt complete 1 run, since 6  was wanted , he hit the ball, and he didnt complete his run, so it would have been a super over only, 

Yeah, because umpire didn't signal a no-ball then, so they thought it was useless

but still after a no-ball(which umpires didnt give) they still needed 7 runs to win, which was again impossible for them, malinga would ahve defended it, Malinga is very experienced, this is very practical, since RCB never makes use of its chances given to it, but MI sometimes uses its chances it gets!!!!!)

As I said, no-ball+1 (=2). They would've run if the umpire had signalled it, cuz they know ABD CAN do it

ABD, could not do it in world cup 2015, he couldnt have done that now as well, Malinga is a death over speasialist , check his records, Even check ABD's recrd, ABD, Couldnt finish many matches for winning cause!

Avatar of flyinggmachine

but they didnt run THE1  Run, many times,the umpire, tells its a no-ball just after the no ball is delivered and hit by batsman, so they still had to make 6 runs on last ball, and it would lead to super over!!

Avatar of edr0nt
ConfusedSpirit wrote:
sougataghosh wrote:
ConfusedSpirit wrote:
sougataghosh wrote:
ConfusedSpirit wrote:
sougataghosh wrote:

Still 5 would've been required then, not super over directly

wrong, dube, didnt complete 1 run, since 6  was wanted , he hit the ball, and he didnt complete his run, so it would have been a super over only, 

Yeah, because umpire didn't signal a no-ball then, so they thought it was useless

but still after a no-ball(which umpires didnt give) they still needed 7 runs to win, which was again impossible for them, malinga would ahve defended it, Malinga is very experienced, this is very practical, since RCB never makes use of its chances given to it, but MI sometimes uses its chances it gets!!!!!)

As I said, no-ball+1 (=2). They would've run if the umpire had signalled it, cuz they know ABD CAN do it

ABD, could not do it in world cup 2015, he couldnt have done that now as well, Malinga is a death over speasialist , check his records, Even check ABD's recrd, ABD, Couldnt finish many matches for winning cause!

If you don't respect ABD, you don't respect cricket lol he's a legend. I said it COULD have been possible. And this t20, not odi world cup

Avatar of flyinggmachine
sougataghosh wrote:
ConfusedSpirit wrote:
sougataghosh wrote:
ConfusedSpirit wrote:
sougataghosh wrote:
ConfusedSpirit wrote:
sougataghosh wrote:

Still 5 would've been required then, not super over directly

wrong, dube, didnt complete 1 run, since 6  was wanted , he hit the ball, and he didnt complete his run, so it would have been a super over only, 

Yeah, because umpire didn't signal a no-ball then, so they thought it was useless

but still after a no-ball(which umpires didnt give) they still needed 7 runs to win, which was again impossible for them, malinga would ahve defended it, Malinga is very experienced, this is very practical, since RCB never makes use of its chances given to it, but MI sometimes uses its chances it gets!!!!!)

As I said, no-ball+1 (=2). They would've run if the umpire had signalled it, cuz they know ABD CAN do it

ABD, could not do it in world cup 2015, he couldnt have done that now as well, Malinga is a death over speasialist , check his records, Even check ABD's recrd, ABD, Couldnt finish many matches for winning cause!

If you don't respect ABD, you don't respect cricket lol he's a legend. I said it COULD have been possible. And this t20, not odi world cup

LOL I do respect him, sad.png

Avatar of edr0nt
ConfusedSpirit wrote:

but they didnt run THE1  Run, many times,the umpire, tells its a no-ball just after the no ball is delivered and hit by batsman, so they still had to make 6 runs on last ball, and it would lead to super over!!

The ball was hit to long off, there was enough time to scamper for a run if the umpire had signalled it no-ball

Avatar of flyinggmachine
sougataghosh wrote:
ConfusedSpirit wrote:

but they didnt run THE1  Run, many times,the umpire, tells its a no-ball just after the no ball is delivered and hit by batsman, so they still had to make 6 runs on last ball, and it would lead to super over!!

The ball was hit to long off, there was enough time to scamper for a run if the umpire had signalled it no-ball

but they could have taken that run as well, just to lower their NRR? Which CSK team does ALL TIMES, if they would have taken the run, still RCB had the chance to win!!!!!!!!

Avatar of edr0nt
ConfusedSpirit wrote:
sougataghosh wrote:
ConfusedSpirit wrote:
sougataghosh wrote:
ConfusedSpirit wrote:
sougataghosh wrote:
ConfusedSpirit wrote:
sougataghosh wrote:

Still 5 would've been required then, not super over directly

wrong, dube, didnt complete 1 run, since 6  was wanted , he hit the ball, and he didnt complete his run, so it would have been a super over only, 

Yeah, because umpire didn't signal a no-ball then, so they thought it was useless

but still after a no-ball(which umpires didnt give) they still needed 7 runs to win, which was again impossible for them, malinga would ahve defended it, Malinga is very experienced, this is very practical, since RCB never makes use of its chances given to it, but MI sometimes uses its chances it gets!!!!!)

As I said, no-ball+1 (=2). They would've run if the umpire had signalled it, cuz they know ABD CAN do it

ABD, could not do it in world cup 2015, he couldnt have done that now as well, Malinga is a death over speasialist , check his records, Even check ABD's recrd, ABD, Couldnt finish many matches for winning cause!

If you don't respect ABD, you don't respect cricket lol he's a legend. I said it COULD have been possible. And this t20, not odi world cup

LOL I do respect him,

By saying he can't do it you're disrespecting him .And stats don't always matter. Living example is DK. Maximum people thought he couldn't do it in Nidahas, but see what happened

Avatar of flyinggmachine
sougataghosh wrote:
ConfusedSpirit wrote:
sougataghosh wrote:
ConfusedSpirit wrote:
sougataghosh wrote:
ConfusedSpirit wrote:
sougataghosh wrote:
ConfusedSpirit wrote:
sougataghosh wrote:

Still 5 would've been required then, not super over directly

wrong, dube, didnt complete 1 run, since 6  was wanted , he hit the ball, and he didnt complete his run, so it would have been a super over only, 

Yeah, because umpire didn't signal a no-ball then, so they thought it was useless

but still after a no-ball(which umpires didnt give) they still needed 7 runs to win, which was again impossible for them, malinga would ahve defended it, Malinga is very experienced, this is very practical, since RCB never makes use of its chances given to it, but MI sometimes uses its chances it gets!!!!!)

As I said, no-ball+1 (=2). They would've run if the umpire had signalled it, cuz they know ABD CAN do it

ABD, could not do it in world cup 2015, he couldnt have done that now as well, Malinga is a death over speasialist , check his records, Even check ABD's recrd, ABD, Couldnt finish many matches for winning cause!

If you don't respect ABD, you don't respect cricket lol he's a legend. I said it COULD have been possible. And this t20, not odi world cup

LOL I do respect him,

By saying he can't do it you're disrespecting him .And stats don't always matter. Living example is DK. Maximum people thought he couldn't do it in Nidahas, but see what happened

Maximun thought so, but I didnt thought that wink.png

Avatar of edr0nt
ConfusedSpirit wrote:
sougataghosh wrote:
ConfusedSpirit wrote:

but they didnt run THE1  Run, many times,the umpire, tells its a no-ball just after the no ball is delivered and hit by batsman, so they still had to make 6 runs on last ball, and it would lead to super over!!

The ball was hit to long off, there was enough time to scamper for a run if the umpire had signalled it no-ball

but they could have taken that run as well, just to lower their NRR? Which CSK team does ALL TIMES, if they would have taken the run, still RCB had the chance to win!!!!!!!!

Yeah, I was a little confused about that too, but I thought they probably were tired

Avatar of flyinggmachine
sougataghosh wrote:
ConfusedSpirit wrote:
sougataghosh wrote:
ConfusedSpirit wrote:

but they didnt run THE1  Run, many times,the umpire, tells its a no-ball just after the no ball is delivered and hit by batsman, so they still had to make 6 runs on last ball, and it would lead to super over!!

The ball was hit to long off, there was enough time to scamper for a run if the umpire had signalled it no-ball

but they could have taken that run as well, just to lower their NRR? Which CSK team does ALL TIMES, if they would have taken the run, still RCB had the chance to win!!!!!!!!

Yeah, I was a little confused about that too, but I thought they probably were tired

yes, that was a tiny difference between both the teams, and eventually, the better team won!!!!!!!!!!!!happy.png

Avatar of edr0nt
ConfusedSpirit wrote:
sougataghosh wrote:
ConfusedSpirit wrote:
sougataghosh wrote:
ConfusedSpirit wrote:
sougataghosh wrote:
ConfusedSpirit wrote:
sougataghosh wrote:
ConfusedSpirit wrote:
sougataghosh wrote:

Still 5 would've been required then, not super over directly

wrong, dube, didnt complete 1 run, since 6  was wanted , he hit the ball, and he didnt complete his run, so it would have been a super over only, 

Yeah, because umpire didn't signal a no-ball then, so they thought it was useless

but still after a no-ball(which umpires didnt give) they still needed 7 runs to win, which was again impossible for them, malinga would ahve defended it, Malinga is very experienced, this is very practical, since RCB never makes use of its chances given to it, but MI sometimes uses its chances it gets!!!!!)

As I said, no-ball+1 (=2). They would've run if the umpire had signalled it, cuz they know ABD CAN do it

ABD, could not do it in world cup 2015, he couldnt have done that now as well, Malinga is a death over speasialist , check his records, Even check ABD's recrd, ABD, Couldnt finish many matches for winning cause!

If you don't respect ABD, you don't respect cricket lol he's a legend. I said it COULD have been possible. And this t20, not odi world cup

LOL I do respect him,

By saying he can't do it you're disrespecting him .And stats don't always matter. Living example is DK. Maximum people thought he couldn't do it in Nidahas, but see what happened

Maximun thought so, but I didnt thought that

You thought he could do it, which was against his stats. Why not the same for ABD?

Avatar of flyinggmachine
sougataghosh wrote:
ConfusedSpirit wrote:
sougataghosh wrote:
ConfusedSpirit wrote:
sougataghosh wrote:
ConfusedSpirit wrote:
sougataghosh wrote:
ConfusedSpirit wrote:
sougataghosh wrote:
ConfusedSpirit wrote:
sougataghosh wrote:

Still 5 would've been required then, not super over directly

wrong, dube, didnt complete 1 run, since 6  was wanted , he hit the ball, and he didnt complete his run, so it would have been a super over only, 

Yeah, because umpire didn't signal a no-ball then, so they thought it was useless

but still after a no-ball(which umpires didnt give) they still needed 7 runs to win, which was again impossible for them, malinga would ahve defended it, Malinga is very experienced, this is very practical, since RCB never makes use of its chances given to it, but MI sometimes uses its chances it gets!!!!!)

As I said, no-ball+1 (=2). They would've run if the umpire had signalled it, cuz they know ABD CAN do it

ABD, could not do it in world cup 2015, he couldnt have done that now as well, Malinga is a death over speasialist , check his records, Even check ABD's recrd, ABD, Couldnt finish many matches for winning cause!

If you don't respect ABD, you don't respect cricket lol he's a legend. I said it COULD have been possible. And this t20, not odi world cup

LOL I do respect him,

By saying he can't do it you're disrespecting him .And stats don't always matter. Living example is DK. Maximum people thought he couldn't do it in Nidahas, but see what happened

Maximun thought so, but I didnt thought that

You thought he could do it, which was against his stats. Why not the same for ABD?

Becuase check DK's records he never choked like him... just saying,(I too respect ABD, but ABD turns out to be unlucky during some matches tear.png)

Avatar of edr0nt

ABD has the POTENTIAL no matter what

Avatar of Guest0190091983
Please Sign Up to comment.

If you need help, please contact our Help and Support team.