unfortunately, beginners start at zero.
sorry for proving you wrong bro.
Not if they like chess, if they enjoy playing chess (like i do), or play for fun, they should stay. i also believe they have their own say in a topic like this.
People below 300 Elo are either completely new or don't dedicate enough to the game, meaning they shouldn't quit the game. Few people stay at 300 Elo when they genuinely try.
If chess brings joy or growth, that’s a win. And if that joy exists, there's no reason to gatekeep it behind numbers.
Ehh, I don't know about that. I think if you're still below 500 after a few months, you're obviously not even trying. (And if you are, chess is clearly not for you.) But I've seen things happen before.
Huh. So should I quit?
People don't play chess, because they are great at chess. People play because they like to play the game, no matter how bad they may be at it.
when the game brings heartache and pain and you after many years of trying still can't above 100 from more than day at a time --you think about quitting oh yes not chess.com but chess -- but this game is addictive just like poker and gambling so it hard to quit -- plus if all the below 300's quit who you beat then. When you need a boost after a hard day of losing to 1500 players -- people don't play chess because they're trying to get better they play it because they have to
dude he littelary said that he isnt serious with this forum and you guys still say its serious. Why bro??