checkmateibeatu wrote:
I, obviously, do not.
People you must treat like human beings, or have all your threads get hijacked
Sort:
checkmateibeatu wrote:
Yeah, and I do understand your point of view, but don't you understand mine?
Expound.
bigpoison wrote:
checkmateibeatu wrote:
I, obviously, do not.
Again, stop with the misquoting.
bigpoison wrote:
Yeah, that too.
You've obviously never picked stone before.
Another Lesson for Gramps:
Only a moron would search for a farmer in order to help pick stones, so he can do himself a favor and learn your "important" lessons.
One more thing: don't wear your ten gallon hat, it will get all dirty.
Again, bite me. I don't take orders from you. Now, go pick some stone!
And I don't take orders from you either!
checkmateibeatu wrote:
And I don't take orders from you either!
That may well be the first post you've made that I can get behind. I apologize for telling you to go pick stone. Please take it as a suggestion rather than an order.
Sep 2, 2011
0
#70
checkmateibeatu wrote:
If someone called you a complete and utter twit, you have every right to tell everyone and defend yourself from the mud that is getting thrown at you.
If someone called Us a "complete and utter twit" it would absolutely kill Us. We would die laughing. If that is the worst thing they could call Us We would feel like We should give them some lessons in how to properly insult someone. You sir need to grow a thicker skin and get over this "complete and utter twit" thing. After all, in the word "twit" they could have substituted an "a" for the"i" and then the level of insult goes up by a order of magnitude.
I don't care. The point is, he had the nerve to single me out in the HEADING of the thread (not just in the thread). Who wouldn't get angry at that?
checkmateibeatu wrote:
The point is, he had the nerve to single me out in the HEADING of the thread (not just in the thread). Who wouldn't get angry at that?
That's what this is about? Because you were insulted in a heading instead of the body of a post? Seriously dude?
Also;
oinquarki wrote:
checkmateibeatu wrote:
Yeah, and I do understand your point of view, but don't you understand mine?
Expound.
When people see that kind of title of a thread, they want to view it, and if they hadn't had any context, they would take what he said as the gospil truth because of first impressions.
checkmateibeatu wrote:
When people see that kind of title of a thread, they want to view it, and if they hadn't had any context, they would take what he said as the gospil truth because of first impressions.
Ok, so you're not offended so much because it insults you, but because you think everyone on the site is an idiot?
Also, what you described definitely didn't happen here;
http://www.chess.com/forum/view/help-support/dont-listen-to-them
Yeah, and I do understand your point of view, but don't you understand mine?