R.I.P. JAMIE DELAROSA

Wrong RJC!  JamieD was clearly told NOT to repost links to porn in that thread by admin and other members.  But she continued to do so... 

and I am done here too with this shits.

... double standards... she appeared to encourage and involve herself in sexual innuendo and then was almost gleeful about publishing and displaying it by expressing her outrage.  Bizarre behaviour.

       Let me add something.  Jamie D told Shaun she was WILLING to be muted;  If it meant that Rhamel would be GONE   Now THAT takes guts. She's willing to fall on the sword if it meant contributing something BETTER for the SITE. Shaun doesn't seem to have picked up on that. That gave the impression that preferential treatment was being given to "premium" accounts. But here's the difference. WhenJamie comes back,(and I hope its soon). HER behaviour will not change. She will continue to be a good SA running groups, posting blogs, helping people. Rhamel will serve his suspention, or mute for a few days, and when he comes back, HIS behavior WON'T change either. He'll continue to cause trouble for groups and SA's and SPAM blogs, and use multiple accounts. So what did Shaun do? 

     Babytigrrr;  Eric over-ruled staff, lifted the ban against her, and said he would look for better ways to report porn. This all happened 2 yrs ago. What does it have to do with Rhamel's behaviour now?  If she kept her nose clean for 2 yrs, my god, she has a better record than my military record. Once a yr I was in the dog house there too

I miss her sexy avatars.

      Why aren't the people from the Vahalla group, the Geezers, Jukebox Cafe, etc, Defending her??

Any avatar she had was better than her posts.

     Al, why don't you follow kco's lead and join Rhamels' Falcon group

They were titillating.

       Ya know I could block people who speak badly of her, but I want Eric to see who is forgiving and who's not.  Czervik and kco have been attacking her since she got here. Why don't you guys just admit she's TOOo tough for you    I sapose YOUR historical record here is perfectly good, and sqeeky clean heh?  You neve made a mistake, or stepped out of line, ganged up on people, or had a minor infraction of the TOS.

If she is tough, why she block me dummy ? I hardly ever spoken to her nor interested in her anyway.

Block me RJC for all I care.

      Probably for the same reason that Trysts blocks me. But I don't block her

Maybe your avatar offends lady trysts.

       Block me RJC for all I care.    haahahahaha   Trying to make me look like a big bully?  Soldiers have a TOS too.  "Don't Beat Up Civilians"

Blocking is easy. She blocked many, especially those that refuted her so-called expertise.

She used sources that were unreliable, and stood by them.

She seemed to love telling everyone of her level of education, as if a degree in one area makes the individual an expert in another.

cc is better without her and members like her.

I'm sorry when any female leaves the site upset... regardless of the circumstance, and if she was indeed female.  There are too few of us as it is and I'm sure JamieD had her good points... by all accounts, she was a good SA.  However, I think in a thread headed 'RIP Jamie Delarosa' ... you pretty much deserve a little wake.  Which is what normally happens when a big ship goes down!  

      "Maybe your avatar offends lady trysts".  ahahahahahahahahahaha   No, its my politics.  I offered her a premium account once. She turned it down.