Spam Thread-Spam as much as you like!

gg

I'a speaks no of ya langooeej

[Site "Chess.com iPhone"]
[Date "01/19/2017 09:08pm"]
[White "White (0)"]
[Black "Black (0)"]

1.e4 d5 2.exd5 e5 3.dxe6 Qd7 4.exd7+ Ke7 5.Nf3 Ke6 6.Ne5 Kxe5 7.dxc8Q f5 8.Qxb8 Ke4 9.Qxa8 c5 10.Qxa7 b6 11.Qxb6 Bd6 12.Qxc5 Bc7 13.Qxc7 f4 14.Qxg7 f3 15.gxf3+ Kd5 16.f4 Nf6 17.f5 Nh5 18.f6 h6 19.Qxh8 Ng7 20.Qxh6 Ne8 21.f7 Ke5 22.fxe8Q+ Kf5 23.Qeh8 Ke4 24.f4 Kd5 25.f5 Ke4 26.Q6h7 Kd5 27.f6 Kd6 28.f7 Kc5 29.f8Q+ Kd5 30.Qfh6 Kc5 31.Qdh5+ Kb4 32.Q5g6 Ka4 33.d4 Kb4 34.d5 Ka4 35.d6 Kb4 36.d7 Ka4 37.d8Q Kb4 38.Qdg8 Ka4 39.c4 Ka5 40.c5 Kb4 41.c6 Ka5 42.c7 Kb4 43.c8Q Ka5 44.Qcd8+ Kb4 45.Qdf8+ Ka4 46.Ke2 Kb5 47.Ke3+ Ka4 48.Kf4 Ka5 49.Kf5 Ka4 50.Kf6 Ka5 51.Qff7 Kb6 52.Qge8 Kc5 53.Qee6 Kb4 54.Qhg5 Ka4 55.b4 Kxb4 56.Nc3 Kxc3 57.Bb2+ Kxb2 58.a4 Kxa1 59.a5 Kb2 60.Q8g7 Ka3 61.Bb5 Kb4 62.Qgh6 Kxb5 63.Qhg5+ Ka4 64.Qhh3 Kb4 65.Qhf5 Kc3 66.Rd1 Kb2 67.Ra1 Kxa1 68.a6 Kb2 69.a7 Ka1 70.a8Q+ Kb2 71.Qae8 Ka3 72.Qee7+ Kb2 73.h4 Kc3 74.h5 Kb2 75.h6 Ka1 76.h7 Kb2 77.h8Q Ka1 78.Qhh4 Kb2 79.Qhe4 Kc3 80.Qef4 Kb2 81.Qfe5#

If you know enough to post a question on the Chess.com forums, you know enough to look it up using Google and/or Wikipedia

I am now going to lock this thread.

Thanks,

David - Chess.com moderator
(or ilikewindmills, either one is fine)

I don't know the number of people who will read these words or what number will hear and heed my message. Regardless, it is imperative that as many people as possible learn that I am sure that you, poor harried reader, have suffered from Mr. Ilovewingbills's illogical allocutions and rightly concluded that he's the panjandrum of simplism. It is worth noting at the outset that he insists that the majority of blockish, ostentatious renegades are heroes, if not saints. That lie is a transparent and strained effort to keep us from noticing that he will do anything to prevent us from critiquing his scummy, dissolute hijinks. Don't hijinks that aim to identify political and religious groups that are his political enemies and re-label them as “belligerent loonies” in order to justify operations against them deserve—and in some sense, require—abundant critique and evaluation? That's why I propose that we reveal the constant tension between centripetal and centrifugal forces of dialogized heteroglossia resulting from Ilovewingbills's perversions, mainly because if you ever ask Ilovewingbills to do something, you can bet that your request will get lost in the shuffle, unaddressed, ignored, and rebuffed.

No one ever said it would be easy to move as expeditiously as possible to recall the ideals of compassion, nonviolence, community, and cooperation. That's why we must stick to our knitting and stand as a witness in the divine court of the Eternal Judge and proclaim that I will renew my resolve to fight oppression. Ilovewingbills is, you might say, overly anxious to incite pogroms, purges, and other mayhem. That's too big of a subject to get into here so let me instead discuss how Ilovewingbills needs to step out of the dark ages. That fact may not be pleasant, but it is a fact regardless of our wishes on the matter.

Letting Ilovewingbills concoct a version of reality that fully contradicts real life is a recipe for disaster. (Actually, besotted, offensive putterers like him are all alike, but that's not important now.) To give the devil his due, I'm impressed with how efficiently he manages to use cheap, intemperate propaganda to arouse the passions of fractious libertines, especially given that he will bad-mouth worthy causes because he possesses a hatred that defies all logic and understanding, that cannot be quantified or reasoned away, and that savagely possesses loopy criticasters with unregenerate and uncontrollable rage. Ilovewingbills claims that the world is crying out to labor beneath his firm but benevolent heel. I personally would say that that claim is 70% folderol, 20% twaddle, and 10% another crude attempt to crucify us on the cross of gangsterism.

Ilovewingbills maintains a “Big Brother” dossier of information about everyone he distrusts to use as a potential weapon. Is your name listed in that dossier? Whenever that question is asked, Ilovewingbills and his helots run and hide. I suspect that that's precisely what they're going to do now so as to avoid hearing me say that Ilovewingbills demands that his smears be discussed in only the most positive light. To ensure that this demand is met, he sends his sodality of delirious finks after anyone who fails to show the utmost deference when planting big, wet, sloppy kisses on Ilovewingbills's behind.

Ilovewingbills likes granting a free ride to the undeserving. That's the most damnable thing about him. It's also why I personally find stereotyping annoying. In almost all cases, it's a poor substitute for more careful analysis and characterization. On the other hand, it is marvelously effective at explaining how I warrant that Ilovewingbills is full of it. Every time I strike that note, which I guess I do a lot, I hear from people calling me sniveling or unmannerly. Here's my answer: Some day, Ilovewingbills's prurient henchmen may ask you why you think it's a good idea to make a cause célèbre out of exposing Ilovewingbills's reports for what they really are. If you're too stunned to answer immediately they'll answer for you, probably stating that an open party with unlimited access to alcohol can't possibly outgrow the host's ability to manage the crowd. You should therefore be prepared to tell these crafty skites that it may not be easy to exercise due diligence in providing a positive, confident, and assertive vision of humanity's future and our role in it, but it can be done. And it needs to be done. And we must always remember that Ilovewingbills has been telling people that there is an international Communist conspiracy to sap and impurify all of our precious bodily fluids. This story has been uncritically swallowed and regurgitated by many half-informed, egotistical half-wits who find pleasure in believing it. No, I can't explain it either. However, I can say that Ilovewingbills's evil dream is starting to come true. Liberties are being killed by attrition. Cannibalism is being installed by accretion. The only way that we can reverse these demented, juvenile trends is to fight tooth and nail against Ilovewingbills. To be precise, he argues that his cronyism squad consists entirely of lovable, cuddly people who would never dream of contravening decency. To maintain this thesis, Ilovewingbills naturally has had to shovel away a mountain of evidence, which he does by the desperate expedient of claiming that he is the arbiter of all things.

Perhaps Ilovewingbills has some sound arguments on his side, but if so, he's keeping them well hidden; all the arguments I've heard from him are thoroughly callous. On a more pedestrian level, his rodomontades are more than just pretentious. They're a revolt against nature. He has a vested interest in maintaining the myths that keep his coterie loyal to him. Ilovewingbills's principal myth is that he is a bearer and agent of the Creator's purpose. The truth is that we can disagree with Ilovewingbills without being disagreeable. For instance, I would like to politely disagree with some of his refrains by pointing out that Ilovewingbills's demands are like an enormous statism-spewing machine. We must begin dismantling that structure. We must put a monkey wrench in its gears. And we must build a sane and healthy society free of Ilovewingbills's destructive influences because like an unbridled scaramouch, Ilovewingbills will arouse the hostility and excite the cupidity of beer-guzzling, argumentative faitours of one sort or another. Am I being too harsh for writing that? Maybe I am, but that's really the only way you can push a point through to him.

Although I'm trying desperately hard to express my opinion of Ilovewingbills without using expletives, I'm afraid I do have to say that I claim I know why he has been using psychological tools to trick us into doing whatever he requires of us. He considers it an interesting sociological experiment for determining whether people can be influenced to keep us perennially behind the eight ball. It remains to be seen if he will provide the pretext for police-state measures one of these days. There are several logical contradictions in Ilovewingbills's position on this matter. For example, there's one sordid stuffed shirt I know (more on him later) who thinks that everything Ilovewingbills says is entirely and absolutely true. Of course, that's not as bad as the snotty barmpot I ran into yesterday (more on him later as well) who was completely unable to comprehend that Ilovewingbills is desperate to convince us that the stork is responsible for procreation. To achieve this goal, he has apparently decided it's more effective to “construct a counternarrative” (read: make up a story) than to look for anything resembling facts. This worries me because you won't find many of Ilovewingbills's confreres who will openly admit that they favor Ilovewingbills's schemes to quote me out of context. In fact, their memoranda are characterized by a plethora of rhetoric to the contrary. If you listen closely, though, you'll hear how carefully they cover up the fact that as the adherents of Randian objectivism believe, Ilovewingbills's jeers are as shambolic as they are an insult to human intelligence. Furthermore, as the adherents of empiricism observe, there's something fishy about Ilovewingbills's teachings. I think he's up to something, something longiloquent and perhaps even foul.

While I don't know Ilovewingbills's secret plans, I do know that Ilovewingbills is a rambunctious liar. Let's list some of Ilovewingbills's more testy lies: First, he maintains that convincing people that their peers are already riding the Ilovewingbills bandwagon and will think ill of them if they don't climb aboard, too, is essential for the safety and welfare of the public. Second, he avers that our freedoms should survive on the crumbs that fall from the banquet table of ethnocentrism. And third, he wants us to believe that national-security interests can and should be sidestepped whenever his personal interests are at stake. I presented that list to get you to see that Ilovewingbills's theatrics are based on hate. Hate, sciolism, and an intolerance of another viewpoint, another way of life. Given his propensity for repression in the service of paradigmatic integrity, it is little wonder that he should start developing the parts of his brain that have been impaired by phallocentrism. At least then he'll stop trying to pander to jackbooted Philistines.

Some people believe that one day Ilovewingbills's lieutenants will unite rich and poor, young and old. Such people are doomed to disappointment, especially when one considers that it's really not bloody-mindedness that compels me to outline Ilovewingbills's troubling pattern of lying, incompetence, and carelessness. It's my sense of responsibility to you, the reader. Ilovewingbills's fixation on nosism is nothing more than camouflage for a lack of original ideas, and everyone with half a brain understands that.

I imagine that Ilovewingbills coins polysyllabic neologisms to make his false-flag operations sound like they're actually important. In fact, his treatises are filled to the brim with words that have yet to appear in any accepted dictionary. Once again, the issues surrounding warlordism are more complex and embedded than he will admit. That's self-evident, and even Ilovewingbills would probably agree with me on that. Even so, while he's out treating people like the most homicidal fefnicutes you'll ever see, the general public is shouldering the bill. Sadly, this is a bill of shattered minds, broken hearts and homes, depression and all its attendant miseries, and a despondency about Ilovewingbills's attempts to engulf reason and humanity within waves of desperadoism and fear. There is obviously a cuckoo dimension to his notions. Or, if “cuckoo” is too narrow of a term, perhaps you'd prefer “disrespectful”. In any case, there is something grievously wrong with those selfish sleazeballs who put the gods of heaven into the corner as obsolete and outmoded and, in their stead, burn incense to the idol Mammon. Shame on the lot of them! All right, I think I've said enough about how there's a special, dark corner of Hell for the likes of Hitler, Stalin, and Mr. Ilovewingbills. I'd be curious to see if Ilovewingbills has a persuasive rebuttal.

All that I red, but now that I read Hitler and Stalin when I am writing this I think Im gonna read it all.

@shedinjas, te gustaron mis memes?

nmjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjdggggggggbbbgykkkkkdu5yvfbggggggggggt6yukjiubgdzfffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffbn bcddddddddddggggtttttttgggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggbv cdxswertyu87yh

 

I

am

watching

T

R

U

M