Taylor Swift

Sort:
PikachuIronMan
Espio-Yo wrote:
WongEthanLY wrote:
Espio-Yo wrote:

Typically girls are the reason of someone bein' s*xist. Like, someone is bein' s*xist to them. Usually girls aren't s*xist to boys

im afraid im gonna disagree here. my class girls are annoying af

Lmao I just meant 75% of the time from what I've seen women are treated differently for the good and bad, bro. XD I didn't mean only men are s*xist lol. Also, I could say the same thin' 'bout boys. "my class girls are annoyin' af", some girls are, some boys are too. You can't stereotype all girls to be "annoyin' af" cuz that's false, my dude.

I don't know much about s*xism, but from what I've seen, girls are still bein' treated worse then men sometimes. FROM WHAT I'VE SEEN YA'LL. THIS IS IN NO WAY FACTS

I didn't mean to stereotype all girls to be annoying, so I'm sorry about that, since boys are also very annoying too. they bully me. ;-;

sebmatu
#5 I have so many negative comments I could make this the thread with the most comments on chess.com
dodo_the_chess_mastermind

Honestly... most teenageish public-school girls are annoying.

PikachuIronMan
ManchesterCityFC1543 wrote:
dodo_the_chess_mastermind wrote:
lilpiplupqueen wrote:

GIRLS NEED TO RUAL THE WORLD

Ok, men gave their strengths and weaknesses and so do women. We need each other, and the sooner you realize that, the better.

There is not way you can rule the world ok. If you tried to men would fight back and not being sexist just from data scientists collected the average male is stronger then the average female so there are some women stronger then other men but the women would probably lose. Yeah plus babies can't happen without partnering. Who ever wierdo person did this there is no need at all to oppose men and be sexist.

women would not necessarily "lose," the war itself would die down to either an agreement or extinction of humanity.

PikachuIronMan
dodo_the_chess_mastermind wrote:

Honestly... most teenageish public-school girls are annoying.

yes but some boys can be hella annoying and sus, too.

dodo_the_chess_mastermind
WongEthanLY wrote:
ManchesterCityFC1543 wrote:
dodo_the_chess_mastermind wrote:
lilpiplupqueen wrote:

GIRLS NEED TO RUAL THE WORLD

Ok, men gave their strengths and weaknesses and so do women. We need each other, and the sooner you realize that, the better.

There is not way you can rule the world ok. If you tried to men would fight back and not being sexist just from data scientists collected the average male is stronger then the average female so there are some women stronger then other men but the women would probably lose. Yeah plus babies can't happen without partnering. Who ever wierdo person did this there is no need at all to oppose men and be sexist.

women would not necessarily "lose," the war itself would die down to either an agreement or extinction of humanity.

Or men enslaved women just to keep the population going

dodo_the_chess_mastermind
WongEthanLY wrote:
dodo_the_chess_mastermind wrote:

Honestly... most teenageish public-school girls are annoying.

yes but some boys can be hella annoying and sus, too.

True, true

PikachuIronMan
dodo_the_chess_mastermind wrote:
WongEthanLY wrote:
ManchesterCityFC1543 wrote:
dodo_the_chess_mastermind wrote:
lilpiplupqueen wrote:

GIRLS NEED TO RUAL THE WORLD

Ok, men gave their strengths and weaknesses and so do women. We need each other, and the sooner you realize that, the better.

There is not way you can rule the world ok. If you tried to men would fight back and not being sexist just from data scientists collected the average male is stronger then the average female so there are some women stronger then other men but the women would probably lose. Yeah plus babies can't happen without partnering. Who ever wierdo person did this there is no need at all to oppose men and be sexist.

women would not necessarily "lose," the war itself would die down to either an agreement or extinction of humanity.

Or men enslaved women just to keep the population going

*sigh* how do men survive without women?

dodo_the_chess_mastermind
WongEthanLY wrote:
dodo_the_chess_mastermind wrote:
WongEthanLY wrote:
ManchesterCityFC1543 wrote:
dodo_the_chess_mastermind wrote:
lilpiplupqueen wrote:

GIRLS NEED TO RUAL THE WORLD

Ok, men gave their strengths and weaknesses and so do women. We need each other, and the sooner you realize that, the better.

There is not way you can rule the world ok. If you tried to men would fight back and not being sexist just from data scientists collected the average male is stronger then the average female so there are some women stronger then other men but the women would probably lose. Yeah plus babies can't happen without partnering. Who ever wierdo person did this there is no need at all to oppose men and be sexist.

women would not necessarily "lose," the war itself would die down to either an agreement or extinction of humanity.

Or men enslaved women just to keep the population going

*sigh* how do men survive without women?

How would women survive without men?

PikachuIronMan
dodo_the_chess_mastermind wrote:
WongEthanLY wrote:
dodo_the_chess_mastermind wrote:
WongEthanLY wrote:
ManchesterCityFC1543 wrote:
dodo_the_chess_mastermind wrote:
lilpiplupqueen wrote:

GIRLS NEED TO RUAL THE WORLD

Ok, men gave their strengths and weaknesses and so do women. We need each other, and the sooner you realize that, the better.

There is not way you can rule the world ok. If you tried to men would fight back and not being sexist just from data scientists collected the average male is stronger then the average female so there are some women stronger then other men but the women would probably lose. Yeah plus babies can't happen without partnering. Who ever wierdo person did this there is no need at all to oppose men and be sexist.

women would not necessarily "lose," the war itself would die down to either an agreement or extinction of humanity.

Or men enslaved women just to keep the population going

*sigh* how do men survive without women?

How would women survive without men?

exactly.

so women wont surrender because they are bringing down men. men wont surrender because they are bringing down women.

that's why men cant enslave women, and vice versa ain't possible either

lilpiplupqueen
dodo_the_chess_mastermind wrote:
WongEthanLY wrote:
dodo_the_chess_mastermind wrote:
WongEthanLY wrote:
ManchesterCityFC1543 wrote:
dodo_the_chess_mastermind wrote:
lilpiplupqueen wrote:

GIRLS NEED TO RUAL THE WORLD

Ok, men gave their strengths and weaknesses and so do women. We need each other, and the sooner you realize that, the better.

There is not way you can rule the world ok. If you tried to men would fight back and not being sexist just from data scientists collected the average male is stronger then the average female so there are some women stronger then other men but the women would probably lose. Yeah plus babies can't happen without partnering. Who ever wierdo person did this there is no need at all to oppose men and be sexist.

women would not necessarily "lose," the war itself would die down to either an agreement or extinction of humanity.

Or men enslaved women just to keep the population going

*sigh* how do men survive without women?

How would women survive without men?

Better everything everyone would be nice world peace just to name a few

PikachuIronMan
lilpiplupqueen wrote:
dodo_the_chess_mastermind wrote:
WongEthanLY wrote:
dodo_the_chess_mastermind wrote:
WongEthanLY wrote:
ManchesterCityFC1543 wrote:
dodo_the_chess_mastermind wrote:
lilpiplupqueen wrote:

GIRLS NEED TO RUAL THE WORLD

Ok, men gave their strengths and weaknesses and so do women. We need each other, and the sooner you realize that, the better.

There is not way you can rule the world ok. If you tried to men would fight back and not being sexist just from data scientists collected the average male is stronger then the average female so there are some women stronger then other men but the women would probably lose. Yeah plus babies can't happen without partnering. Who ever wierdo person did this there is no need at all to oppose men and be sexist.

women would not necessarily "lose," the war itself would die down to either an agreement or extinction of humanity.

Or men enslaved women just to keep the population going

*sigh* how do men survive without women?

How would women survive without men?

Better everything everyone would be nice world peace just to name a few

“Everyone?” You meant no one because people wouldn’t exist

lilpiplupqueen

Shut up

lilpiplupqueen
WongEthanLY wrote:
lilpiplupqueen wrote:
dodo_the_chess_mastermind wrote:
WongEthanLY wrote:
dodo_the_chess_mastermind wrote:
WongEthanLY wrote:
ManchesterCityFC1543 wrote:
dodo_the_chess_mastermind wrote:
lilpiplupqueen wrote:

GIRLS NEED TO RUAL THE WORLD

Ok, men gave their strengths and weaknesses and so do women. We need each other, and the sooner you realize that, the better.

There is not way you can rule the world ok. If you tried to men would fight back and not being sexist just from data scientists collected the average male is stronger then the average female so there are some women stronger then other men but the women would probably lose. Yeah plus babies can't happen without partnering. Who ever wierdo person did this there is no need at all to oppose men and be sexist.

women would not necessarily "lose," the war itself would die down to either an agreement or extinction of humanity.

Or men enslaved women just to keep the population going

*sigh* how do men survive without women?

How would women survive without men?

Better everything everyone would be nice world peace just to name a few

“Everyone?” You meant no one because people wouldn’t exist

also guess what without woman there would be nothing

PikachuIronMan
lilpiplupqueen wrote:
WongEthanLY wrote:
lilpiplupqueen wrote:
dodo_the_chess_mastermind wrote:
WongEthanLY wrote:
dodo_the_chess_mastermind wrote:
WongEthanLY wrote:
ManchesterCityFC1543 wrote:
dodo_the_chess_mastermind wrote:
lilpiplupqueen wrote:

GIRLS NEED TO RUAL THE WORLD

Ok, men gave their strengths and weaknesses and so do women. We need each other, and the sooner you realize that, the better.

There is not way you can rule the world ok. If you tried to men would fight back and not being sexist just from data scientists collected the average male is stronger then the average female so there are some women stronger then other men but the women would probably lose. Yeah plus babies can't happen without partnering. Who ever wierdo person did this there is no need at all to oppose men and be sexist.

women would not necessarily "lose," the war itself would die down to either an agreement or extinction of humanity.

Or men enslaved women just to keep the population going

*sigh* how do men survive without women?

How would women survive without men?

Better everything everyone would be nice world peace just to name a few

“Everyone?” You meant no one because people wouldn’t exist

also guess what without woman there would be nothing

Exactly! Look at post #221

beefystewyy
Go eagles
lilpiplupqueen

N

lilpiplupqueen

O

sebmatu
Y
sebmatu
E