Well, staples proved his point somewhat. Lyudmil, your turn!
Yes, really impressive, OP busted 2000 player with his secret. Now OP is 2000 level.
Well, staples proved his point somewhat. Lyudmil, your turn!
Yes, really impressive, OP busted 2000 player with his secret. Now OP is 2000 level.
Well, staples proved his point somewhat. Lyudmil, your turn!
Yes, really impressive, OP busted 2000 player with his secret. Now OP is 2000 level.
What if he was playing black? HMMM
You can´t compare, Lyudmil is a well known theoretician, this guy stpales is a clown.
Lyudmil is a clown. Lots of 2000+ players challenged him,he refused.
His claim is not back up by any proof. Staples got 2000 rating by his method, at least decent.
Any 100 rated player can claim like Lyudmil, " I won SF" no proof.
Well he showed games, and his theories were okay, even though he exaggerated... also staples played 3 min. and sometimes got lucky.
We have a feud!
@drmrboss and @congrandolor
staples and Lyudmil.
I'm taking Lyudmil's side, honestly. I HATE facing the english.
I have also found the refutation to 1.e4 f5:
Pack it up guys. Chess is solved.
Well, the point is that 1.e4 c5 is well known opening and people are happy to play from black.
But @staples13 busted them.
But your opening is something that only champanzee may probably play from black.
We have a feud!
@drmrboss and @congrandolor
staples and Lyudmil.
I'm taking Lyudmil's side, honestly. I HATE facing the english.
Haha, I havent played here for a while but this thread is fun and exciting to play some blitz game back. @horribletomato, what do you want me to do?
Well, staples proved his point somewhat. Lyudmil, your turn!
Yes, really impressive, OP busted 2000 player with his secret. Now OP is 2000 level.
What if he was playing black? HMMM
HMMMMMMM
We have a feud!
@drmrboss and @congrandolor
staples and Lyudmil.
I'm taking Lyudmil's side, honestly. I HATE facing the english.
Haha, I havent played here for a while but this thread is fun and exciting to play some blitz game back. @horribletomato, what do you want me to do?
I'm not sure I understand your statement. Anyways just state your case and I'll add your name to staple's side.
I have also found the refutation to 1.e4 f5:
Pack it up guys. Chess is solved.
HMMM contradictions...