The Metaphysics of Metaphysics, Part 1

Sort:
XemeNode
The complete assimilation of all axiomatic prostitutions into a singular model of reality is daring, for what shared (tautological) aspects of reality are sysnonymous with the unified relative assembly of unquantifiable (bits of) information that we call "the multiverse"? The a priori MU theory is tautological itself, even teleological. Why? Because without the reality-theoretic abstraction of the concrete "world" which is subject to interpretation, how can a model exist in the non-specified manner? How can the abstraction of objective reality lack unto itself its own concrete model (of which its identity is imposed on it as a reality-structure)? Reality is equivocally sysnonymous with its own descriptive manifold. Why does this matter? Because in order to construct the metaphysical abstraction of logic, one must first logically infer that logic exists without an argument of self-reference. The only problem is that a lack of self-reference (with regards to metalogic) would ultimately collapse by logical inconsistency. All structure that innately make up the entirety of reality itself must be the descriptive mapping of itself, leading to the structure of logic. How is this done? By nature of physico-logical constraint through self-definition.
XemeNode

All this is true. I am surely God now, the ruler of all of reality!