Lol. Seriously 25G, are you on a side? Or are you trying to prove both of us wrong?
We need to stop this!
Sort:
May 26, 2021
0
#63
HistoryTeacher2 wrote:
Correcting ones grammar or spelling is rarely productive in a forum such as this. I try not to do it facetiously. I honestly believe the erosion of the language is harmful in certain respects. I would hope we do not someday all sound like Snoop Dog.
It's rarely productive, which is why I stopped doing it. I agree with you for once.
May 26, 2021
0
#65
JackRoach wrote:
HistoryTeacher2 wrote:
Correcting ones grammar or spelling is rarely productive in a forum such as this. I try not to do it facetiously. I honestly believe the erosion of the language is harmful in certain respects. I would hope we do not someday all sound like Snoop Dog.
It's rarely productive, which is why I stopped doing it. I agree with you for once.
Congrats, you've learned. Although why did you do it in the first place. I thought it'd be obvious
May 26, 2021
0
#66
JackRoach wrote:
25GSchatz22 wrote:
JackRoach wrote:
Not if I can prove to them that they are an idiot. My definition of, "winning," is being right, and convincing the spectators you are right. Unless it's an opinion, then just the latter.
That's why I used to put up a show for everyone when I argued, but now I'm more relaxed and not as attacking. I don't mind much defending.
The problem is you have continued to deny the opinion that has been proven correct. You simply can't admit you're wrong.
I don't understand what you mean by this. I've admitted I was wrong before.
Perhaps, but not enough.
May 26, 2021
0
#67
HistoryTeacher2 wrote:
25GSchatz22 wrote:
HistoryTeacher2 wrote:
Correcting ones grammar or spelling is rarely productive in a forum such as this. I try not to do it facetiously. I honestly believe the erosion of the language is harmful in certain respects. I would hope we do not someday all sound like Snoop Dog.
It doesn't make you sound smart. It makes you sound like you're trying to sound smart, perhaps because you're dumb
Your comment sort of proves my point. For lack of a better argument you resort to calling someone dumb
I wasn't calling you dumb. I was adding to your comment. Nothing against you, just a general response to anyone
May 26, 2021
0
#68
25GSchatz22 wrote:
JackRoach wrote:
HistoryTeacher2 wrote:
Correcting ones grammar or spelling is rarely productive in a forum such as this. I try not to do it facetiously. I honestly believe the erosion of the language is harmful in certain respects. I would hope we do not someday all sound like Snoop Dog.
It's rarely productive, which is why I stopped doing it. I agree with you for once.
Congrats, you've learned. Although why did you do it in the first place. I thought it'd be obvious
I didn't do it much. I didn't point them out constantly, I only did it semi-commonly and usually did it as a joke.
It wasn't very funny I realized, and someone blocked me just for it. So I stopped.
May 26, 2021
0
#69
25GSchatz22 wrote:
JackRoach wrote:
25GSchatz22 wrote:
JackRoach wrote:
Not if I can prove to them that they are an idiot. My definition of, "winning," is being right, and convincing the spectators you are right. Unless it's an opinion, then just the latter.
That's why I used to put up a show for everyone when I argued, but now I'm more relaxed and not as attacking. I don't mind much defending.
The problem is you have continued to deny the opinion that has been proven correct. You simply can't admit you're wrong.
I don't understand what you mean by this. I've admitted I was wrong before.
Perhaps, but not enough.
Are you talking about the Pedestrian/cyclist stuff? Let's not get into that here, we'll both look like idiots.
May 26, 2021
0
#70
HistoryTeacher2 wrote:
I wasn't calling you dumb. I was adding to your comment. Nothing against you, just a general response to anyone.
Doesn't change the fact that you resort to immature name calling
I'm conveying a meaning. Take it as you will. It wasn't immature name calling either. Just precision of language. I prefer someone who is upfront, rather than someone who's vague
May 26, 2021
0
#71
JackRoach wrote:
25GSchatz22 wrote:
JackRoach wrote:
25GSchatz22 wrote:
JackRoach wrote:
Not if I can prove to them that they are an idiot. My definition of, "winning," is being right, and convincing the spectators you are right. Unless it's an opinion, then just the latter.
That's why I used to put up a show for everyone when I argued, but now I'm more relaxed and not as attacking. I don't mind much defending.
The problem is you have continued to deny the opinion that has been proven correct. You simply can't admit you're wrong.
I don't understand what you mean by this. I've admitted I was wrong before.
Perhaps, but not enough.
Are you talking about the Pedestrian/cyclist stuff? Let's not get into that here, we'll both look like idiots.
No, not the pedestrian stuff. I'm just noting on your character
May 26, 2021
0
#72
HistoryTeacher2 wrote:
25G is trolling
Not really. I also like to have clear and simple arguments, but that can't always happen. It's getting a lot more muddled now, but you don't have to blame it on anyone.
May 26, 2021
0
#73
HistoryTeacher2 wrote:
25G is trolling
Am I? I'll leave that up to you
May 26, 2021
0
#74
JackRoach wrote:
HistoryTeacher2 wrote:
25G is trolling
Not really. I also like to have clear and simple arguments, but that can't always happen. It's getting a lot more muddled now, but you don't have to blame it on anyone.
I agree. Precision of language is important. You want to convey the correct meaning.
May 26, 2021
0
#75
25GSchatz22 wrote:
JackRoach wrote:
25GSchatz22 wrote:
JackRoach wrote:
25GSchatz22 wrote:
JackRoach wrote:
Not if I can prove to them that they are an idiot. My definition of, "winning," is being right, and convincing the spectators you are right. Unless it's an opinion, then just the latter.
That's why I used to put up a show for everyone when I argued, but now I'm more relaxed and not as attacking. I don't mind much defending.
The problem is you have continued to deny the opinion that has been proven correct. You simply can't admit you're wrong.
I don't understand what you mean by this. I've admitted I was wrong before.
Perhaps, but not enough.
Are you talking about the Pedestrian/cyclist stuff? Let's not get into that here, we'll both look like idiots.
No, not the pedestrian stuff. I'm just noting on your character
Well, my "online character," has a big ego. I'm not actually like that in real life.
Idk, a big ego kinda adds to my character, but takes away as well.
May 26, 2021
0
#76
HistoryTeacher2 wrote:
The classic troll argues with anything he can find for the inane reason that "he can".
Ah. Now you're resorting to, "immature name calling." Going against your own philosophy.
May 26, 2021
0
#77
I understand history not taking us seriously because we're kids, but it's really just annoying.
May 26, 2021
0
#78
HistoryTeacher2 wrote:
The classic troll argues with anything he can find for the inane reason that "he can".
Trust me, I'm getting more out of this conversation than you are. I'm not arguing to prove any point or just to argue. I'm not even arguing. I'm responding and learning from the responses I'm getting. BTW Your responses have been interesting. I'm learning a lot about you.
May 26, 2021
0
#79
JackRoach wrote:
25GSchatz22 wrote:
JackRoach wrote:
25GSchatz22 wrote:
JackRoach wrote:
25GSchatz22 wrote:
JackRoach wrote:
Not if I can prove to them that they are an idiot. My definition of, "winning," is being right, and convincing the spectators you are right. Unless it's an opinion, then just the latter.
That's why I used to put up a show for everyone when I argued, but now I'm more relaxed and not as attacking. I don't mind much defending.
The problem is you have continued to deny the opinion that has been proven correct. You simply can't admit you're wrong.
I don't understand what you mean by this. I've admitted I was wrong before.
Perhaps, but not enough.
Are you talking about the Pedestrian/cyclist stuff? Let's not get into that here, we'll both look like idiots.
No, not the pedestrian stuff. I'm just noting on your character
Well, my "online character," has a big ego. I'm not actually like that in real life.
Idk, a big ego kinda adds to my character, but takes away as well.
It gives you character. It lowers your reputation
Not if I can prove to them that they are an idiot. My definition of, "winning," is being right, and convincing the spectators you are right. Unless it's an opinion, then just the latter.
That's why I used to put up a show for everyone when I argued, but now I'm more relaxed and not as attacking. I don't mind much defending.
The problem is you have continued to deny the opinion that has been proven correct. You simply can't admit you're wrong.
I don't understand what you mean by this. I've admitted I was wrong before.