With all due to general respects, the syntactic descriptive processing of language does not infer directly to the structure of reality without at first having a mathematical Point of Reference and a logical structure. The way we get so far as to a general theory of reality is simple. Reality itself is a nonsensical illusion built on by synthesis, for where one thing may mean something to someone somewhere, all in all the delusion is up front with our current understanding of reality. For example, if I said something in Spanish, you may or may not understand it, and if you knew all languages and their general descriptive syntax you might as well kneel... Einstein knew this and all men should know as well. For where general "truths" processed in a transducer with a mathematical and syntactical inference through binary grammar may be at stake, we do not regard reality as a language since all descriptions and their content are interrelated. For if I said that Murica was South of Idaho, so it may be, but I also believe and know for fact that Georgia is too. In my "reality", certain things both perceived and unperceived but real nonetheless have a certain encryption, so in a way blasphemy is always inconsistent unto its own mathematical syntax. Insuchaway language is merely a tool, not a definitive structure that can be mathematically distributed over the universe. We must not regard reality as real for this very reason, since space and time are not always linear and thus fluctuate, so warped our perceptions that even objects in the same place are not perceived at once.