Who Thinks I can be a Good Top Blogger?

Sort:
ChampoftheBepoCamp
Lightning wrote:

I mean if I could do it anyone can xD

how long did you message take to accept? I did it like 3 days back still no answer sad.png

Lightning
ChampoftheCommieCamp wrote:
Lightning wrote:

I mean if I could do it anyone can xD

how long did you message take to accept? I did it like 3 days back still no answer

I applied around 4 months ago, something like that, so

ChampoftheBepoCamp
Lightning wrote:
ChampoftheCommieCamp wrote:
Lightning wrote:

I mean if I could do it anyone can xD

how long did you message take to accept? I did it like 3 days back still no answer

I applied around 4 months ago, something like that, so

But like the time from

1. Date you applied >>> 2. Date you got accepted

Lightning
ChampoftheCommieCamp wrote:
Lightning wrote:
ChampoftheCommieCamp wrote:
Lightning wrote:

I mean if I could do it anyone can xD

how long did you message take to accept? I did it like 3 days back still no answer

I applied around 4 months ago, something like that, so

But like the time from

1. Date you applied >>> 2. Date you got accepted

Well I was accepted a week ago, so it was between 3-4 months

ChampoftheBepoCamp
Lightning wrote:
ChampoftheCommieCamp wrote:
Lightning wrote:
ChampoftheCommieCamp wrote:
Lightning wrote:

I mean if I could do it anyone can xD

how long did you message take to accept? I did it like 3 days back still no answer

I applied around 4 months ago, something like that, so

But like the time from

1. Date you applied >>> 2. Date you got accepted

Well I was accepted a week ago, so it was between 3-4 months

c58d2d42e521eec98334a53e38bfa729.gif

KaydenDaGoalie

welp

M1m1c15
Yeah there’s no one your gonna be top blogger
KaydenDaGoalie

cruel ppeople

ChampoftheBepoCamp
Kayden_Potter wrote:

cruel ppeople

sad.png

mech2345
Not me
KaydenDaGoalie

cruel

chessplayer109485

There's a difference between being cruel and being realistic. When you reach the point where you are able to understand chess well enough to explain it to someone else, then you can start thinking about becoming a top blogger. I have looked at some of your blogs, and you do not really seem to understand the topics you are discussing. I am not trying to be mean; that is just how I see it. If you put a month or two into trying to understand chess better and then go over what you learned, I think you will have a good shot at becoming a top blogger. Alternatively, you could try to document your road to becoming a better player so that people can follow you on your journey. There is no reason you cannot become a top blogger if you do not work at it!

KaydenDaGoalie

Ok ok i got enough "being realistic"crap:/

KeSetoKaiba

I agree with @SlowCynicalQuip's post, unless you are trying to be a "Top Blogger" about something other than chess. Lots of bloggers on here post other things of interest. One reason becoming a "Top Blogger" (by chess.com) is difficult is because of the quantity needed. You have to post a certain amount before you can even apply I believe. 

Additionally, (if you are talking about chess) more people are inclined to listen if your rating is higher. It isn't about the number per se (even a 1500 player with enthusiasm could out-blog an 1800+ without the drive), but you should at least be able to convey the information in an enlightening way and you can't even convey accurate information at all if you don't understand the topic yourself. You don't have to be anywhere close to a GM (or even a titled chess player; although it wouldn't hurt), but you should at least have a solid foundation and rating wise in chess, that is at least 1500+ chess.com rating I'd say; perhaps even 1800+ or 2000+ would be better, but this is just my opinion. 

If you really want to become a chess blogger, I say go for it! You can do it happy.png Just know that it won't necessarily be a simple journey. Remember the expression, "Rome wasn't built in a day."

KaydenDaGoalie

how do i delete? i am not get construtive advice more criticism

ChampoftheBepoCamp
KeSetoKaiba wrote:

I agree with @SlowCynicalQuip's post, unless you are trying to be a "Top Blogger" about something other than chess. Lots of bloggers on here post other things of interest. One reason becoming a "Top Blogger" (by chess.com) is difficult is because of the quantity needed. You have to post a certain amount before you can even apply I believe. 

Additionally, (if you are talking about chess) more people are inclined to listen if your rating is higher. It isn't about the number per se (even a 1500 player with enthusiasm could out-blog an 1800+ without the drive), but you should at least be able to convey the information in an enlightening way and you can't even convey accurate information at all if you don't understand the topic yourself. You don't have to be anywhere close to a GM (or even a titled chess player; although it wouldn't hurt), but you should at least have a solid foundation and rating wise in chess, that is at least 1500+ chess.com rating I'd say; perhaps even 1800+ or 2000+ would be better, but this is just my opinion. 

If you really want to become a chess blogger, I say go for it! You can do it Just know that it won't necessarily be a simple journey. Remember the expression, "Rome wasn't built in a day."

Lel I applied dammit still no sig!

Kesarling_UT

IDK.

TheChocolateCake

Lock forum topic?

M1m1c15
Yes pls
OneThousandEightHundred18

You have received constructive advice and you should follow it. Nobody is trying to make you feel bad when they say you need to improve in chess to be a good chess blogger, its literally the single most important key to your success.