I guess it is plausible to suggest chess represents a humans decision making, IE humans have the freedom to choose what to think, say or do. Similarly in chess you have the choice what to do. Maybe it's painful to choose but at least you can, i'd rather be able to do that than be a robot and feel comfortable. Life is suffering
Couldn't agree more.
The fact is, thinking is hardest thing there is, and when facing a choice we typically prefer the path of least resistance, the shortcut, and delegate our decision to some supreme leader, infallible religious figure, handy iPhone, chess engine, or any sort of Big Mama in showing a strong tendency of worshiping them.
They, in turn, will ventriloquize the divine and tell us what to do.
Thanks for checking in, RedGirlZ.
And a George Orwell quote!! One of the few proper - non chess writers that I have actually read!!!😂.
Mate, why don't you try your fellow countryman John Fowles' Magus?
I've read it twice (so far
)
Look what New York Times says about it (and I fully agree with it
)
""The Magus" is a stunner, magnificent in ambition, supple and gorgeous in execution. It fits no neat category; it is at once a pyrotechnical extravaganza, a wild, hilarious charade, a dynamo of suspense and horror, a profoundly serious probing into the nature of moral consciousness, a dizzying, electrifying chase through the labyrinth of the soul, an allegorical romance, a sophisticated account of modern love, a ghost story that will send shivers racing down the spine. Lush, compulsive, richly inventive, eerie, provocative, impossibly theatrical--it is, in spite of itself, convincing. It is, in fact, a trick ("magus" means magician or conjurer)--a trick about conviction. The stupefying thing is that Mr. Fowles has pulled it off. The book seems to have its own energy; it reverberates in the mind."