Who's Big Mama of Modern Chess Player?

Sort:
RoaringPawn
simaginfan wrote:

And a George Orwell quote!! One of the few proper - non chess writers that I have actually read!!!😂. 

Mate, why don't you try your fellow countryman John Fowles' Magus?

I've read it twice (so farhappy.png)

Look what New York Times says about it (and I fully agree with ithappy.png)

""The Magus" is a stunner, magnificent in ambition, supple and gorgeous in execution. It fits no neat category; it is at once a pyrotechnical extravaganza, a wild, hilarious charade, a dynamo of suspense and horror, a profoundly serious probing into the nature of moral consciousness, a dizzying, electrifying chase through the labyrinth of the soul, an allegorical romance, a sophisticated account of modern love, a ghost story that will send shivers racing down the spine. Lush, compulsive, richly inventive, eerie, provocative, impossibly theatrical--it is, in spite of itself, convincing. It is, in fact, a trick ("magus" means magician or conjurer)--a trick about conviction. The stupefying thing is that Mr. Fowles has pulled it off. The book seems to have its own energy; it reverberates in the mind."

RoaringPawn
RedGirlZ wrote:

I guess it is plausible to suggest chess represents a humans decision making, IE humans have the freedom to choose what to think, say or do. Similarly in chess you have the choice what to do. Maybe it's painful to choose but at least you can, i'd rather be able to do that than be a robot and feel comfortable. Life is suffering

Couldn't agree more. 

The fact is, thinking is hardest thing there is, and when facing a choice we typically prefer the path of least resistance, the shortcut, and delegate our decision to some supreme leader, infallible religious figure, handy iPhone, chess engine, or any sort of Big Mama in showing a strong tendency of worshiping them.

They, in turn, will ventriloquize the divine and tell us what to do.

Thanks for checking in, RedGirlZ.

RoaringPawn
woollensock wrote:
Taking the path of least resistance, teaches you nothing, and you will remain a robotic Earthling .

Liked that, a "robotic Earthling"happy.png Thanks @woollensock

and in order not to become one, we shouldn't let any Big Mama pull wool over our eyeswink.png

RoaringPawn
woollensock wrote:
Couldn’t agree more 👍

thumbup.pnghappy.png

RoaringPawn
woollensock wrote:
Absolutely old boy ! ,thumb up.png 👍

we seem sort of relatives of the feline species, so mutual understanding somehow goes a long way, doesn't ithappy.png

kamalakanta

Well, I on't know about you guys, but I am posting my Big Mama photo:

 

RoaringPawn

What generation of engines is your Big Mama?

Y'always listening to her suggested moves of action in chess and elsewhere? 

kamalakanta

No big mama for me. I analyze on my own.

RoaringPawn
kamalakanta wrote:

No big mama for me. I analyze on my own.

Yes, I know, your Big Mama is human, she’s your human “engine”.

simaginfan
RoaringPawn wrote:
simaginfan wrote:

And a George Orwell quote!! One of the few proper - non chess writers that I have actually read!!!😂. 

Mate, why don't you try your fellow countryman John Fowles' Magus?

I've read it twice (so far)

Look what New York Times says about it (and I fully agree with it)

""The Magus" is a stunner, magnificent in ambition, supple and gorgeous in execution. It fits no neat category; it is at once a pyrotechnical extravaganza, a wild, hilarious charade, a dynamo of suspense and horror, a profoundly serious probing into the nature of moral consciousness, a dizzying, electrifying chase through the labyrinth of the soul, an allegorical romance, a sophisticated account of modern love, a ghost story that will send shivers racing down the spine. Lush, compulsive, richly inventive, eerie, provocative, impossibly theatrical--it is, in spite of itself, convincing. It is, in fact, a trick ("magus" means magician or conjurer)--a trick about conviction. The stupefying thing is that Mr. Fowles has pulled it off. The book seems to have its own energy; it reverberates in the mind."

Yo, my roaring friend. Just remembered that i have also  read the works of Conan Doyle - Victorian detective stories are great!! and the complete works of Shakespeare. Now I can sound a little more educated. grin.png Check this out - my favourite performance of my favourite piece of non-chess writing.

redRonIdaho
RoaringPawn wrote:
simaginfan wrote:

And a George Orwell quote!! One of the few proper - non chess writers that I have actually read!!!😂. 

Mate, why don't you try your fellow countryman John Fowles' Magus?

I've read it twice (so far)

Look what New York Times says about it (and I fully agree with it)

""The Magus" is a stunner, magnificent in ambition, supple and gorgeous in execution. It fits no neat category; it is at once a pyrotechnical extravaganza, a wild, hilarious charade, a dynamo of suspense and horror, a profoundly serious probing into the nature of moral consciousness, a dizzying, electrifying chase through the labyrinth of the soul, an allegorical romance, a sophisticated account of modern love, a ghost story that will send shivers racing down the spine. Lush, compulsive, richly inventive, eerie, provocative, impossibly theatrical--it is, in spite of itself, convincing. It is, in fact, a trick ("magus" means magician or conjurer)--a trick about conviction. The stupefying thing is that Mr. Fowles has pulled it off. The book seems to have its own energy; it reverberates in the mind."

 

I second RP's recommendation on The Magus.  Definitely a stunner, and a bit of a head-scratcher, in a puzzling sort of way.  A bit like chess, I guess.  Gets deep, real quick.  

RoaringPawn

Yes, Ron, a stunner, a stun gun, a knockout!

RoaringPawn

Another bad idea to early retire? Fischerandom as 9LX?

We should show a little bit more respect to the inventor of new chess variant that is showing absolute superiority over the dead-horse-classical with its pervert engines' and theoretical preps. Watched Champs Showdown yesterday?