Why is it so hard for you to accept that evolution is fact?

Sort:
N0V_EL
Chat what’s happening
x-5607209224
just-fester wrote:

Also please provide the goverment source that verified what happened 3320 years ago with Moses et al so I may be enlightened

Note: This is an Australian government source, not a U.S. Government source.

https://tfhc.nt.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0016/252223/nt-judaism-fact-sheet.pdf

https://worldreligions.wordpress.ncsu.edu/judaism/

https://www.science.co.il/israel-history/

The reason I am posting these is to prove my much earlier point that, as a Christian, 3,000 years ago I would NOT be worshiping a pantheon.

x-5607209224
just-fester wrote:
Fennla wrote:
Fennla wrote:
just-fester wrote:
Fennla wrote:

Unreliable methods.

Let me guess. Home schooled Christian under 18.

You think so?

Also you haven't showed how the methods weren't unreliable.

I haven"t the time nor inclination to teach science to a denier. Why don't you teach me why it's unreliable

Be my guest, if you will.

https://answersingenesis.org/age-of-the-earth/dating-methods/?aigcb=4497

This explaines it better than I ever would.

x-5607209224
just-fester wrote:
Fennla wrote:
just-fester wrote:
Fennla wrote:

Unreliable methods.

Let me guess. Home schooled Christian under 18.

You think so?

Yes

Then think away. However, I am not inclined to give any personal information about myself on a random website. Why, you don't even know my name. All you have to go off of are two words I said.

And just because I hold to a certain set of beliefs and have evidence (see above) to back it, does not make me anything in particular. That is both an ad-hominum fallacy AND a stereotype.

If you read the article, you will see there are more people than just Christian homeschoolers who believe the dating methods now in use have problems.

sawdof
Fennla wrote:

Then think away. However, I am not inclined to give any personal information about myself on a random website. Why, you don't even know my name. All you have to go off of is something I said.

And just because I hold to a certain set of beliefs and have evidence (see above) to back it, does not make me anything in particular. That is both an ad-hominum fallacy AND a stereotype.

If you read the article, you will see there are more people than just Christian homeschoolers who believe the dating methods now in use have problems.

The online black cat doth protest too much

x-5607209224
just-fester wrote:

Oh a religious site! How original.

Yes. Definitely home schooled

With historical context. And what about those archaelogical discoveries they never talk about? Like the time a guy found an alter and copies of the Torah on a mountain dating back to above cited period of time?

But If you ignore what I say, than I waste my time. Bye!

x-5607209224
sawdof wrote:
Fennla wrote:

Then think away. However, I am not inclined to give any personal information about myself on a random website. Why, you don't even know my name. All you have to go off of is something I said.

And just because I hold to a certain set of beliefs and have evidence (see above) to back it, does not make me anything in particular. That is both an ad-hominum fallacy AND a stereotype.

If you read the article, you will see there are more people than just Christian homeschoolers who believe the dating methods now in use have problems.

The online black cat doth protest too much

Yes I love my pfp

x-5607209224
just-fester wrote:
Fennla wrote:
just-fester wrote:

Oh a religious site! How original.

Yes. Definitely home schooled

With historical context. And what about those archaelogical discoveries they never talk about? Like the time a guy found an alter and copies of the Torah on a mountain dating back to above cited period of time?

But If you ignore what I say, than I waste my time. Bye!

I have studied and discussed the bible longer than you have been alive. It's tiring refuting the same things everytime a new generation of believers comes along.

All I will suggest is for you to spend just a little effort to educate yourself from a non-religious source. You won't be struck with lightning or damned to hellfire but you might realize that theology isn't science. Not even a little bit.

You seem to be a bit biased against religious sources. This tells me you never even bothered to read the article about the different methods of dating past the first 1,000 words.

Here is a random quote from it: "The RATE group has also documented carbon-14 in coal and diamonds that are supposed to be millions to billions of years old. If these items were truly more than 100,000 years old, there should be no detectable carbon-14 present in them. These findings point to the age of the earth being much younger than evolutionary scientists would suggest."

Don't be biased again any source just because it is religious. Next thing you'll be telling me that because Sir Isaac Newton was a Christain, gravity doesn't exist. Or that because Copernicus was a Christian, the earth actually is flat... simply because they were theologist monomaniacs who cannot be believed.

Ok. Maybe not quite that far, but that's the direction you seem to be taking.

You can't win an arguement by simply attacking the other debater and his sources for being religious. You have provided no evidence to counter the multiple sources I carelfully found for you.

You said "I have studied and discussed the bible longer than you have been alive. It's tiring refuting the same things everytime a new generation of believers comes along."

Words, words, words. You haven't given an inkling of scientific evidence. If you are refuting the same thing each time, than you must be using outdated evidence. My evidence is recent and up-to-date.

In light of this, I have no interest in further sparring with a person who ignores everything I say simply because I am a Christian.

So, goodbye.

x-5607209224

But I appreciate the suggestion about studying scientific sources. I do think that is important.

BigChessplayer665

"Words, words, words. You haven't given an inkling of scientific evidence. If you are refuting the same thing each time, than you must be using outdated evidence. My evidence is recent and up-to-date."

You seem to have the same problem your trying to describe 

N0V_EL
Trying to understand creation is already beyond any person’s mental reach. What god is a god if a mortal mind can completely understand his ways? What we as humans do, is believe in evidence, and idk about you but the Bible is my evidence. You go write you dissertations on evolution and why it’s fact. Me on the other hand would rather believe that I’m not a mistake and that I’m made with a purpose and that God loves me. I rest my case
N0V_EL
You believe what you want. We’ll see who’s right when the world ends.
BigChessplayer665
Bob201019 wrote:
Trying to understand creation is already beyond any person’s mental reach. What god is a god if a mortal mind can completely understand his ways? What we as humans do, is believe in evidence, and idk about you but the Bible is my evidence. You go write you dissertations on evolution and why it’s fact. Me on the other hand would rather believe that I’m not a mistake and that I’m made with a purpose and that God loves me. I rest my case

Smart people do it down so dumb people understand (I'm not calling you dumb btw )

I'm sure God doesn't really do that maybe if God exists he should try to convince people to be better at that lol

N0V_EL
🤷‍♂️ sure wtv. You can call me dumb. I believe what I want. I’m not gonna make you change your mind, it’s your own fault or my fault if you or I is wrong.
LordHunkyhair3

#584 Amen, bro

BigChessplayer665
Bob201019 wrote:
Trying to understand creation is already beyond any person’s mental reach.trying is at least better than just believing folk tale  What god is a god if a mortal mind can completely understand his ways? then why Believe something you can't even understand?What we as humans do, is believe in evidence, and idk about you but the Bible is my evidence. ok but religion has historically never been good evidence You go write you dissertations on evolution and why it’s fact. theres already plenty of papers and reasoning that explains better than I can and more accurate about evolution to Me on the other hand would rather believe that I’m not a mistake what's wrong with being a mistake ? No body is perfect. and that I’m made with a purpose and that God loves me. sure just like every other human ? What's the point of someone loving you if they love everyone... that seems kinda piontlesI rest my case ok 👍
N0V_EL
👍 thanks for not calling me dumb lol. 😅
N0V_EL
Why not
N0V_EL
Ok 🤷‍♂️ come on man, stop arguing w me I’m not an expert in theology lol 😅 but still…
BigChessplayer665
Bob201019 wrote:
Ok 🤷‍♂️ come on man, stop arguing w me I’m not an expert in theology lol 😅 but still…

I like arguing tho

This forum topic has been locked