A theory is a theory, same as a problem is a problem, not an answer. Also just because it is the main topic in most schools and media doesn't make it right. I just saw a post the other day saying Einstien didn't fail High school. He did, but he didn't stop trying.
Why is it so hard for you to accept that evolution is fact?
Sort:
Look at the simple cell. Still simple? Now imagine all of that plus 1000 billion more. I'm sure that just happened accidentally
FCW1 wrote:
Evelotultion can take a while and it takes one step at a time
Does it? Where did you get it from. I'm skeptical about the information you have.
46 that I can agree with
Also idiots online always say "Don't come up with an answer associated with Ken Ham, cuz he's fake".
O.k then, YOU can't come up with an answer associated with Darwin, cuz he's fake. XD
Who’s Ken Ham. That’s like the Barbie movie and my sandwich I had a lunch combined or smth
LordHunkyhair3 wrote:
Animals have evolved and adapted, to better suit their environment over the years, but not into other species
Yes, Microevolution is real, with actual evidence. Macroevolution isn't supported with enough evidence. Hence, Micro(evolution) meaning Micro(small) changes, Macro(evolution) meaning Macro(big) changes.
I still wanna know who Ken Ham is 🤷
May 10, 2024
0
#50
Ken Ham is one of the leading Creationist guys , I think hes the president of a creation institute or something too
You look that up?
Animals do evolve into different species.
hapless, in my view, statisticians are taught to measure what and how much, rather than what and why. It's rather like valuing price rather than value, as though they value something on the grounds of its price, since that price must be justified if x people have bought it.
Acceptable theories are those that form the consensus. They form the consensus since they haven't been disproven and no-one can be bothered to think up more satisfactory mechanisms. So they believe in the Big Bang in exactly the same way that people once believed in YEC .... msinoitaerC htraE gnuoY.
66 oh ok 😂
Gotcha
Pawn, how you tryna argue with someone that you gave up on 5 HOURS ago
GodsCoelacanth wrote:
LordHunkyhair3 wrote:
Animals have evolved and adapted, to better suit their environment over the years, but not into other species
Yes, Microevolution is real, with actual evidence. Macroevolution isn't supported with enough evidence. Hence, Micro(evolution) meaning Micro(small) changes, Macro(evolution) meaning Macro(big) changes.
It actually is supported because it's been shown that the supposed distinction between macro and microevolution is false and has been created simply to confuse people and win arguments with.
Optimissed wrote:
GodsCoelacanth wrote:
LordHunkyhair3 wrote:
Animals have evolved and adapted, to better suit their environment over the years, but not into other species
Yes, Microevolution is real, with actual evidence. Macroevolution isn't supported with enough evidence. Hence, Micro(evolution) meaning Micro(small) changes, Macro(evolution) meaning Macro(big) changes.
It actually is supported because it's been shown that the supposed distinction between macro and microevolution is false and has been created simply to confuse people and win arguments with.
Where's your info from? It was created to distinguish small and big changes. It makes it more simple, not harder SMH
It isn't really possible to give that sort of opinion with people like you-know-who in attendance. He always knows better but not all that bright.