Why is it so hard for you to accept that evolution is fact?

Sort:
dearprince
DrakonicStriker_17 wrote:
U do realize that even scientists with 100 more iq than u know its just a theiry

You do realize that Christianity is widely accepted, and yet it's still a theory.

You guys have no evidence.

The Big Bang was also a theory, and yet is also widely accepted.

We have slight evidence, at least.

GodsCoelacanth
Optimissed wrote:
2-fakevans wrote:
Why do they not let religion get talked abt but they let evolution get talked abt biased?

evolution's science.

ev·o·lu·tion
[ˌevəˈlo͞oSHən]
noun
the process by which different kinds of living organisms are thought to have developed and diversified from earlier forms during the history of the earth.
Similar:Darwinism
natural selection
the gradual development of something, especially from a simple to a more complex form:
"the forms of written languages undergo constant evolution"

Big error there!

GodsCoelacanth
dearprince wrote:
DrakonicStriker_17 wrote:
Bug bang hmm? Where da big bang come from. Nothing cant make something

Bro thinks nothing can't make something.

Well, he's right.

But what he doesn't realize that there was something before the Big Bang.

Meanwhile, when God created the stars, the earth, the sky, etc, etc, there was nothing before, except him.

So it can be that something can create something.

As a non-religious person, I'm gonna be impartial here, but if you're gonna question how hydrogen particles bonded, then we might as well question back where God came from.

God was always there, kinda how God works.

Also in order to figure out what the first thing was in the big bang(more like 'bungle') was, it would infinitely go on forever. Something had to be there to make it, but a God suggests the God was there all along.

dearprince
GodsCoelacanth wrote:
dearprince wrote:
DrakonicStriker_17 wrote:
Bug bang hmm? Where da big bang come from. Nothing cant make something

Bro thinks nothing can't make something.

Well, he's right.

But what he doesn't realize that there was something before the Big Bang.

Meanwhile, when God created the stars, the earth, the sky, etc, etc, there was nothing before, except him.

So it can be that something can create something.

As a non-religious person, I'm gonna be impartial here, but if you're gonna question how hydrogen particles bonded, then we might as well question back where God came from.

God was always there, kinda how God works.

Also in order to figure out what the first thing was in the big bang(more like 'bungle') was, it would infinitely go on forever. Something had to be there to make it, but a God suggests the God was there all along.

"God was always there, kinda how god works."

What about the "you can't make something from nothing" saying?

Also, if God was really there, and he created the Big Bang...

well, it is a plausibility. Might consider that soon.

GodsCoelacanth
dearprince wrote:
DrakonicStriker_17 wrote:
U do realize that even scientists with 100 more iq than u know its just a theiry

You do realize that Christianity is widely accepted, and yet it's still a theory.

You guys have no evidence.

The Big Bang was also a theory, and yet is also widely accepted.

We have slight evidence, at least.

Just because our evidence isn't in school textbooks doesn't mean it isn't there. We have evidence of places from Biblical accounts, literally. Notice how no one spreads the word. But if there's a skull that is arranged the wrong way and looks like a 'Missing Link'(how do we know they are there if they are missing?) the news goes crazy over it.

GodsCoelacanth
dearprince wrote:
GodsCoelacanth wrote:
dearprince wrote:
DrakonicStriker_17 wrote:
Bug bang hmm? Where da big bang come from. Nothing cant make something

Bro thinks nothing can't make something.

Well, he's right.

But what he doesn't realize that there was something before the Big Bang.

Meanwhile, when God created the stars, the earth, the sky, etc, etc, there was nothing before, except him.

So it can be that something can create something.

As a non-religious person, I'm gonna be impartial here, but if you're gonna question how hydrogen particles bonded, then we might as well question back where God came from.

God was always there, kinda how God works.

Also in order to figure out what the first thing was in the big bang(more like 'bungle') was, it would infinitely go on forever. Something had to be there to make it, but a God suggests the God was there all along.

"God was always there, kinda how god works."

What about the "you can't make something from nothing" saying?

Also, if God was really there, and he created the Big Bang...

well, it is a plausibility. Might consider that soon.

Thats why in the Bible it says not to believe man's fallable opinion.

GodsCoelacanth

https://www.bing.com/ck/a?!&&p=d0e1d342b28852c5JmltdHM9MTcxNTM4NTYwMCZpZ3VpZD0zOWVkOTRiYS0yYTJhLTYwY2EtMTk3ZS04NDY1MmIwNjYxMDgmaW5zaWQ9NTE1OQ&ptn=3&ver=2&hsh=3&fclid=39ed94ba-2a2a-60ca-197e-84652b066108&u=a1L3ZpZGVvcy9zZWFyY2g_cT1kYW5nZXJzK29mK3RoZWlzdGljK2V2b2x1dGlvbitieSthK2V2b2x1dGlvbmlzdCZxcHZ0PWRhbmdlcnMrb2YrdGhlaXN0aWMrZXZvbHV0aW9uK2J5K2ErZXZvbHV0aW9uaXN0JkZPUk09VkRSRQ&ntb=1

Dangers of Theistic Evolution, by your own side.

GodsCoelacanth

"Proofs exist only in mathematics and logic, not in science. Mathematics and logic are both closed, self-contained systems of propositions, whereas science is empirical and deals with nature as it exists. The primary criterion and standard of evaluation of scientific theory is evidence, not proof. All else equal (such as internal logical consistency and parsimony), scientists prefer theories for which there is more and better evidence to theories for which there is less and worse evidence. Proofs are not the currency of science."

Before people start posting wrong comments, please remember the basics. You cannot prove in science. I feel like the schools really miss this nowadays

GodsCoelacanth

Another thing, Genesis has to be in the Bible and has to be real. Why would God make up a fake story on how we were created?

Fig51
Is the opposite called young earth creationism? I forgot.
GodsCoelacanth

'Have you not known? Have you not heard? The Lord is the everlasting God, the Creator of the ends of the earth. He does not faint or grow weary; his understanding is unsearchable. (Isaiah 40:28)'

Answer to the 'who made God question.

Also I am only stating facts, it would be better for people to know these simple things. All your trying to do is get me blocked, you haven't responded any better than me. I've made it clear I make no offense,

Make it clear in that post you were trying to get rid of me, not in the forum.

I'm only stating facts, and asnwering, and responding, no harshness is from my typing.

GodsCoelacanth
Optimissed wrote:
GodsCoelacanth wrote:
Optimissed wrote:
2-fakevans wrote:
Why do they not let religion get talked abt but they let evolution get talked abt biased?

evolution's science.

ev·o·lu·tion
[ˌevəˈlo͞oSHən]
noun
the process by which different kinds of living organisms are thought to have developed and diversified from earlier forms during the history of the earth.
Similar:Darwinism
natural selection
the gradual development of something, especially from a simple to a more complex form:
"the forms of written languages undergo constant evolution"

Big error there!

If you think I made an error, you probably better explain why you think so. Don't expect me to read your mind. Warning ... by now I know I'm quite a lot more intelligent than you are.

And where's the answer? XD You've only bragged about being smarter than before.

Fig51
Is the opposite called young earth creationism? I forgot.
GodsCoelacanth
Fig51 wrote:
Is the opposite called young earth creationism? I forgot.

Young Earth involves the full Biblical account. Old Earth takes away Genesis, Theistic Evolution adds evolution and the Bible together, and you already know evolution. (In a nutshell)

GodsCoelacanth
GodsCoelacanth wrote:
Optimissed wrote:
GodsCoelacanth wrote:
Optimissed wrote:
2-fakevans wrote:
Why do they not let religion get talked abt but they let evolution get talked abt biased?

evolution's science.

ev·o·lu·tion
[ˌevəˈlo͞oSHən]
noun
the process by which different kinds of living organisms are thought to have developed and diversified from earlier forms during the history of the earth.
Similar:Darwinism
natural selection
the gradual development of something, especially from a simple to a more complex form:
"the forms of written languages undergo constant evolution"

Big error there!

If you think I made an error, you probably better explain why you think so. Don't expect me to read your mind. Warning ... by now I know I'm quite a lot more intelligent than you are.

And where's the answer? XD You've only bragged about being smarter than before.

Also notice the word 'thought', what does that mean to you?

'I rest my case'

Those reading please look for the Northern Lights tonight, as this is a rare occasion happening alot more south than usual

GodsCoelacanth
Optimissed wrote:
Fig51 wrote:
Is the opposite called young earth creationism? I forgot.

Can we please not answer him? We can report him but that could get the thread closed. Wait for hapless to block him.

For what? Asking a normal question? Just chill. he meant no harm just curiosity. These are in textbooks, so as long as he's in the topic of school, he's fine.

Fig51
Oh sorry, didn’t know that the question might block this.
LordHunkyhair3

It wouldn't, optimissed is just a pretentious know it all

LordHunkyhair3

#117 ahhh you found me out 😔 whatever am I to do?

Sillver1

opti, hapless op is vague about the blocking, so i asked him explicitly. it’s up to him if he want to share it or not, but coming from you is just pure gossip.. lol. i have a pot of stew in the oven for almost 2 hrs now, and can’t wait for it to be ready. do you cook?

This forum topic has been locked