#123 you ever tried a haggis? Good eating that is
Why is it so hard for you to accept that evolution is fact?
Sort:
#127 I do have discretion and taste, I never said I agreed with you 😐
#129 indubitably
#130 He didn't even quote the bible
My dad's favourite team is Arsenal actually
Jebus told me to go forth and evolve
May 11, 2024
0
#89
GodsCoelacanth wrote:
dearprince wrote:
DrakonicStriker_17 wrote:
U do realize that even scientists with 100 more iq than u know its just a theiry
You do realize that Christianity is widely accepted, and yet it's still a theory.
You guys have no evidence.
The Big Bang was also a theory, and yet is also widely accepted.
We have slight evidence, at least.
Just because our evidence isn't in school textbooks doesn't mean it isn't there. We have evidence of places from Biblical accounts, literally. Notice how no one spreads the word. But if there's a skull that is arranged the wrong way and looks like a 'Missing Link'(how do we know they are there if they are missing?) the news goes crazy over it.
you realize that people who believed in god built those places, right?
May 11, 2024
0
#90
Skillz_Crux wrote:
jesus once said chess is the way of life
wh-
no he did not
i may not know a lot abt religion but i know that jesus DID NOT say that
May 12, 2024
0
#91
Yesterday was a travel day for me: Paducah to Nashville to Orlando to West Palm Beach (Brightline so I don’t have to drive in Orlando) to Stuart, the finest town in Florida. I didn’t have time to monitor this thread, so don’t think my silence is tacit agreement.
Scientists and good materialists everywhere can’t understand why someone doesn’t accept the fact of evolution. The major argument here so far is that many’s religious beliefs are at odds with evolution.
So be it. You’ve made your case. Be aware that materialists view this as lunacy. If I were a materialist I would agree.
I order to keep within chess.com’s guidelines, please don’t cross the line separating rhetoric from proselytizing.
MmmKay?
Scientists and good materialists everywhere can’t understand why someone doesn’t accept the fact of evolution. The major argument here so far is that many’s religious beliefs are at odds with evolution.
So be it. You’ve made your case. Be aware that materialists view this as lunacy. If I were a materialist I would agree.
I order to keep within chess.com’s guidelines, please don’t cross the line separating rhetoric from proselytizing.
MmmKay?
May 12, 2024
0
#93
My fingers tremble with fear as I type this, as one simply does not disagree with Optimissed lightly, but…
I think gullible is an overused and almost obsolete term.
For example, the finer parts - meaning almost all - of physics escape me, especially in the realm of the singular and at the quantum level.
String Theory the ‘wave’ of the future? Sounds good. The BBT is dead? If you say so. Something can truly arise from truly nothing? Well I guess so, now that you mention it.
I’m not gullible, I just don’t know enough to question it.
In the final analysis, one could say that about almost every field of endeavor.
I think gullible is an overused and almost obsolete term.
For example, the finer parts - meaning almost all - of physics escape me, especially in the realm of the singular and at the quantum level.
String Theory the ‘wave’ of the future? Sounds good. The BBT is dead? If you say so. Something can truly arise from truly nothing? Well I guess so, now that you mention it.
I’m not gullible, I just don’t know enough to question it.
In the final analysis, one could say that about almost every field of endeavor.
May 13, 2024
0
#94
True believers in what? Study what? Quantum mechanics? Extra bits of what? Straight answers please.
Pegusu wrote:
There’s as much science to support Intelligent Design as there is to support the theory of evolution.
Absolutely!
Brain wrote:
167 how
A great example would be the numerous organs (over a hundred if I recall correctly) that up until recently scientists thought were useless byproducts of the process of evolution. They have now all been demonstrated to serve a purpose in the body.
There is an alarming lack of transitional fossils as well, and the ones that Evolutionists hold up to support their theories can always be classified as virtually human, or virtually ape. There are no solid transitional fossils, but if Evolution is true we should see just as many transitional fossils as regular fossils.
#121 well I agree with Godscoelcanth so probably not joking